There is a possible bug when using Firefox 3.0.1 under Rails 2.0.2 with embedding objects. I discovered after upgrading to Firefox 3.0.1, embedded flash movies will not display properly under Rails. The flash movies display cropped thus not displaying the right and bottom sides of the movies. By increasing the embedded object''s width and height the flash movies will display properly within Firefox 3.0.1, but this will cause other problems with other browsers. After stripping away all unneeded code, it was discovered that Firefox 3.0.1 under Rails REDUCES the dimensions of an embedded object''s width and height (all approximately 91% of original size). For example, an object embedded at 400x400 will be reduced to 366x366, 600x600 reduced to 548x548, 200x200 reduced to 184x184 (all approximately 91% of original size). The test code and some screen shots compating various browsers is posted here: http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/index.html PLEASE NOTE: The same embedded Flash objects display properly when using html and Firefox 3.0.1 (see screen shot Firefox 3.0.1 html). In other words, the problem only occurs with Firefox 3.0.1 under Rails. Firefox3.0.1/html, MSIE/Rails, Opera/Rails and Safari/Rails work properly using the same embedded object. Any ideas? Does anyone else get the same results or is this just my setup? Thanks --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 10 Sep 2008, at 12:29, MalHayn wrote:> > There is a possible bug when using Firefox 3.0.1 under Rails 2.0.2 > with embedding objects. > > I discovered after upgrading to Firefox 3.0.1, embedded flash movies > will not display properly under Rails. The flash movies display > cropped thus not displaying the right and bottom sides of the movies. > By increasing the embedded object''s width and height the flash movies > will display properly within Firefox 3.0.1, but this will cause other > problems with other browsers.How does the html generated via rails and the static file differ. Is it something like a different content-type or doc type is triggering a change in browser behaviour? Fred> > > After stripping away all unneeded code, it was discovered that Firefox > 3.0.1 under Rails REDUCES the dimensions of an embedded object''s width > and height (all approximately 91% of original size). > > For example, an object embedded at 400x400 will be reduced to 366x366, > 600x600 reduced to 548x548, 200x200 reduced to 184x184 (all > approximately 91% of original size). > > The test code and some screen shots compating various browsers is > posted here: > > http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/index.html > > > PLEASE NOTE: The same embedded Flash objects display properly when > using html and Firefox 3.0.1 (see screen shot Firefox 3.0.1 html). In > other words, the problem only occurs with Firefox 3.0.1 under Rails. > > Firefox3.0.1/html, MSIE/Rails, Opera/Rails and Safari/Rails work > properly using the same embedded object. > > Any ideas? > > Does anyone else get the same results or is this just my setup? > > > Thanks > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:29 AM, MalHayn <markharper-M7KELlHQcZDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > There is a possible bug when using Firefox 3.0.1 under Rails 2.0.2 > with embedding objects. > > I discovered after upgrading to Firefox 3.0.1, embedded flash movies > will not display properly under Rails. The flash movies display > cropped thus not displaying the right and bottom sides of the movies. > By increasing the embedded object''s width and height the flash movies > will display properly within Firefox 3.0.1, but this will cause other > problems with other browsers. > > After stripping away all unneeded code, it was discovered that Firefox > 3.0.1 under Rails REDUCES the dimensions of an embedded object''s width > and height (all approximately 91% of original size). > > For example, an object embedded at 400x400 will be reduced to 366x366, > 600x600 reduced to 548x548, 200x200 reduced to 184x184 (all > approximately 91% of original size). > > The test code and some screen shots compating various browsers is > posted here: > > http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/index.html > > > PLEASE NOTE: The same embedded Flash objects display properly when > using html and Firefox 3.0.1 (see screen shot Firefox 3.0.1 html). In > other words, the problem only occurs with Firefox 3.0.1 under Rails. > > Firefox3.0.1/html, MSIE/Rails, Opera/Rails and Safari/Rails work > properly using the same embedded object. > > Any ideas? > > Does anyone else get the same results or is this just my setup?Hi, I have noticed rendering issues with Firefox 3.0.1 an its ability to properly render these tags. Next, all browsers display rendered HTML or some variant of it. Furthermore, this is a Firefox issue that needs to be addressed by their core development team. Finally, all browsers are not created equally and you might have to indicate on your site as to what browsers are recommended and/or which are not and why. Good luck, -Conrad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Rimantas Liubertas
2008-Sep-10 13:05 UTC
Re: Possible Bug: Firefox 3.0.1 - embedded objects
> How does the html generated via rails and the static file differ. Is > it something like a different content-type or doc type is triggering a > change in browser behaviour? > > FredYes, I am thinking along the same lines. Most likely some CSS rule from rails stylesheet gets involved. Regards, Rimantas -- http://rimantas.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Hi, Good points, but there is nothing different with content-type or doc type or any of the code. And the stylesheets have been removed. I have posted the entire webpage code online so other can test for themselves. http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/index.html The webpage code was saved as demo.html, as well as, demo.rhtml within the layout directory of the rails app. Each page is exactly the same. When using Firefox 3.0.1 the html version displays as it should. But the rails rhtml version reduces the embedded object by about 91% when using Firefox 3.0.1. MSIE, Opera, Safari display the embedded object at 100% size. Prior upgrading to version 3.0, Firefox displayed the embedded objects properly. Using: Rails 2.0.2, Mongrel 1.1.2, Ruby 1.8.6, Instant Rails 2.0. Win XP Pro. Any other ideas? On Sep 10, 4:05 pm, "Rimantas Liubertas" <riman...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > How does the html generated via rails and the static file differ. Is > > it something like a different content-type or doc type is triggering a > > change in browser behaviour? > > > Fred > > Yes, I am thinking along the same lines. Most likely some CSS rule > from rails stylesheet gets involved. > > Regards, > Rimantas > --http://rimantas.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 10 Sep 2008, at 15:13, MalHayn wrote:> > Hi, > > Good points, but there is nothing different with content-type or doc > type or any of the code. And the stylesheets have been removed. > > > I have posted the entire webpage code online so other can test for > themselves. > > http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/index.html > > > The webpage code was saved as demo.html, as well as, demo.rhtml within > the layout directory of the rails app. Each page is exactly the same. > > When using Firefox 3.0.1 the html version displays as it should. But > the rails rhtml version reduces the embedded object by about 91% when > using Firefox 3.0.1. > > MSIE, Opera, Safari display the embedded object at 100% size. > > Prior upgrading to version 3.0, Firefox displayed the embedded objects > properly. > > Using: Rails 2.0.2, Mongrel 1.1.2, Ruby 1.8.6, Instant Rails 2.0. Win > XP Pro. > > > Any other ideas? >Does it change if you fix the embed/param tag (there''s no closing tag which could be triggering some funky quirks mode thing)? Fred> > > > On Sep 10, 4:05 pm, "Rimantas Liubertas" <riman...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>> How does the html generated via rails and the static file differ. Is >>> it something like a different content-type or doc type is >>> triggering a >>> change in browser behaviour? >> >>> Fred >> >> Yes, I am thinking along the same lines. Most likely some CSS rule >> from rails stylesheet gets involved. >> >> Regards, >> Rimantas >> --http://rimantas.com/ > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Frederick Cheung < frederick.cheung-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > > On 10 Sep 2008, at 15:13, MalHayn wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > Good points, but there is nothing different with content-type or doc > > type or any of the code. And the stylesheets have been removed. > > > > > > I have posted the entire webpage code online so other can test for > > themselves. > > > > http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/index.html > > > > > > The webpage code was saved as demo.html, as well as, demo.rhtml within > > the layout directory of the rails app. Each page is exactly the same. > > > > When using Firefox 3.0.1 the html version displays as it should. But > > the rails rhtml version reduces the embedded object by about 91% when > > using Firefox 3.0.1. > > > > MSIE, Opera, Safari display the embedded object at 100% size. > > > > Prior upgrading to version 3.0, Firefox displayed the embedded objects > > properly. > > > > Using: Rails 2.0.2, Mongrel 1.1.2, Ruby 1.8.6, Instant Rails 2.0. Win > > XP Pro. > > > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > Does it change if you fix the embed/param tag (there''s no closing tag > which could be triggering some funky quirks mode thing)? > > Fred > > > > > > > > On Sep 10, 4:05 pm, "Rimantas Liubertas" <riman...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >>> How does the html generated via rails and the static file differ. Is > >>> it something like a different content-type or doc type is > >>> triggering a > >>> change in browser behaviour? > >> > >>> Fred > >> > >> Yes, I am thinking along the same lines. Most likely some CSS rule > >> from rails stylesheet gets involved. > >> >Hi, Fred brings up a very good point because some browsers may not be able to recover from HTML coding errors. Thus, there were 13 errors within your HTML code that you mention in the above. You should fix all the errors and warnings within your HTML by using the following page: http://validator.w3.org/check Good luck, -Conrad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Conrad Taylor <conradwt-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Frederick Cheung < > frederick.cheung-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On 10 Sep 2008, at 15:13, MalHayn wrote: >> >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > Good points, but there is nothing different with content-type or doc >> > type or any of the code. And the stylesheets have been removed. >> > >> > >> > I have posted the entire webpage code online so other can test for >> > themselves. >> > >> > http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/index.html >> > >> > >> > The webpage code was saved as demo.html, as well as, demo.rhtml within >> > the layout directory of the rails app. Each page is exactly the same. >> > >> > When using Firefox 3.0.1 the html version displays as it should. But >> > the rails rhtml version reduces the embedded object by about 91% when >> > using Firefox 3.0.1. >> > >> > MSIE, Opera, Safari display the embedded object at 100% size. >> > >> > Prior upgrading to version 3.0, Firefox displayed the embedded objects >> > properly. >> > >> > Using: Rails 2.0.2, Mongrel 1.1.2, Ruby 1.8.6, Instant Rails 2.0. Win >> > XP Pro. >> > >> > >> > Any other ideas? >> > >> >> Does it change if you fix the embed/param tag (there''s no closing tag >> which could be triggering some funky quirks mode thing)? >> >> Fred >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sep 10, 4:05 pm, "Rimantas Liubertas" <riman...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >>> How does the html generated via rails and the static file differ. Is >> >>> it something like a different content-type or doc type is >> >>> triggering a >> >>> change in browser behaviour? >> >> >> >>> Fred >> >> >> >> Yes, I am thinking along the same lines. Most likely some CSS rule >> >> from rails stylesheet gets involved. >> >> >> > > Hi, Fred brings up a very good point because some browsers may not be able > to > recover from HTML coding errors. Thus, there were 13 errors within your > HTML > code that you mention in the above. You should fix all the errors and > warnings > within your HTML by using the following page: > > http://validator.w3.org/check >http://validator.w3.org/> > Good luck, > > -Conrad > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Hi Guys, Thanks for the input. Rework the code to reduce the css error messages to 4, but problem still remains. Embedded objects are reduce by about 91%. Here is the reworked code... http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/demo.html When reviewing the two "source codes" output from Firefox 3.0.1 under Rails and the html version, both are exactly the same. Weird! I posted this over on Mozilla. No response yet.> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Conrad Taylor <conra...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Frederick Cheung < > > frederick.che...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > >> On 10 Sep 2008, at 15:13, MalHayn wrote: > > >> > Hi, > > >> > Good points, but there is nothing different with content-type or doc > >> > type or any of the code. And the stylesheets have been removed. > > >> > I have posted the entire webpage code online so other can test for > >> > themselves. > > >> >http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/index.html > > >> > The webpage code was saved as demo.html, as well as, demo.rhtml within > >> > the layout directory of the rails app. Each page is exactly the same. > > >> > When using Firefox 3.0.1 the html version displays as it should. But > >> > the rails rhtml version reduces the embedded object by about 91% when > >> > using Firefox 3.0.1. > > >> > MSIE, Opera, Safari display the embedded object at 100% size. > > >> > Prior upgrading to version 3.0, Firefox displayed the embedded objects > >> > properly. > > >> > Using: Rails 2.0.2, Mongrel 1.1.2, Ruby 1.8.6, Instant Rails 2.0. Win > >> > XP Pro. > > >> > Any other ideas? > > >> Does it change if you fix the embed/param tag (there''s no closing tag > >> which could be triggering some funky quirks mode thing)? > > >> Fred > > >> > On Sep 10, 4:05 pm, "Rimantas Liubertas" <riman...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> >>> How does the html generated via rails and the static file differ. Is > >> >>> it something like a different content-type or doc type is > >> >>> triggering a > >> >>> change in browser behaviour? > > >> >>> Fred > > >> >> Yes, I am thinking along the same lines. Most likely some CSS rule > >> >> from rails stylesheet gets involved. > > > Hi, Fred brings up a very good point because some browsers may not be able > > to > > recover from HTML coding errors. Thus, there were 13 errors within your > > HTML > > code that you mention in the above. You should fix all the errors and > > warnings > > within your HTML by using the following page: > > >http://validator.w3.org/check > > http://validator.w3.org/ > > > > > Good luck, > > > -Conrad--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:40 AM, MalHayn <markharper-M7KELlHQcZDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > Hi Guys, > > Thanks for the input. > > Rework the code to reduce the css error messages to 4, but problem > still remains. Embedded objects are reduce by about 91%. > > Here is the reworked code... > > http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/demo.html > > When reviewing the two "source codes" output from Firefox 3.0.1 under > Rails and the html version, both are exactly the same. Weird! > > I posted this over on Mozilla. No response yet. >Hi, they would be the same because the code rendered by the browser is XHTML. Furthermore, it doesn''t really matter what dynamic language you use because the interpreter for the language will produce HTML which is then rendered by the browser. Thus, you''re looking in the wrong place in trying to resolve your issue because it''s browser issue instead of a framework issue. Finally, it''s good that you posted this with the Mozilla team but I wouldn''t allow this issue to prevent me from moving forward with my project. Good luck, -Conrad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Rimantas Liubertas
2008-Sep-10 17:45 UTC
Re: Possible Bug: Firefox 3.0.1 - embedded objects
> Hi Guys, > > Thanks for the input. > > Rework the code to reduce the css error messages to 4, but problem > still remains. Embedded objects are reduce by about 91%. > > Here is the reworked code... > > http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/demo.htmlDo you have that problem in this URL too? Because my FF3.0.1 shows it as 400px. Try to install Firebug extension and then look what CSS rules apply to your element. Regards, Rimantas -- http://rimantas.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Hi Rimantas, Thanks for the response. The url (demo.html) will display properly at 400x400. If you take that code (demo.html) and save it as demo.rhtml. Then view demo.rhtml under rails using Firefox 3.0.1, you might see the the resize problem. This is the weirdness. The same code produces different results. I''ll try Firebug and report the results.> > Hi Guys, > > > Thanks for the input. > > > Rework the code to reduce the css error messages to 4, but problem > > still remains. Embedded objects are reduce by about 91%. > > > Here is the reworked code... > > >http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/demo.html > > Do you have that problem in this URL too? Because my FF3.0.1 shows > it as 400px. > Try to install Firebug extension and then look what CSS rules apply to > your element. > > Regards, > Rimantas > --http://rimantas.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Rimantas Liubertas
2008-Sep-10 18:56 UTC
Re: Possible Bug: Firefox 3.0.1 - embedded objects
> If you take that code (demo.html) and save it as demo.rhtml. Then view > demo.rhtml under rails using Firefox 3.0.1, you might see the the > resize problem.Nope, it is still 400px when serverd from rails (2.1.0) Regards, Rimantas -- http://rimantas.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Hi Rimantas, What language is your website (http://rimantas.com/ )? Where are you? Thank you so much reporting your test results. It''s got to be my setup. I installed Firebug and it reports the exact same output for both the html and rails version. I''m going to remove then reinstall Firefox. I''ll report back.> > If you take that code (demo.html) and save it as demo.rhtml. Then view > > demo.rhtml under rails using Firefox 3.0.1, you might see the the > > resize problem. > > Nope, it is still 400px when serverd from rails (2.1.0) > > Regards, > Rimantas > --http://rimantas.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Hi All, No solution... I removed and reinstalled Firefox 3.0.1 and the problem was still there: under Rails the embedded objects were reduced in size to approximately 91% of the original size. For example, an object embedded at 400x400 reduced to 366x366, 600x600 reduced to 548x548, 200x200 reduced to 184x184. Back to Firefox 2.0... I removed Firefox 3.0.1 and installed Firefox 2.0 and the problem was gone: embedded objects display properly at 100% size. Completely weird. Thanks all.> Hi Rimantas, > > What language is your website (http://rimantas.com/)? Where are you? > > Thank you so much reporting your test results. It''s got to be my > setup. > > I installed Firebug and it reports the exact same output for both the > html and rails version. > > I''m going to remove then reinstall Firefox. I''ll report back. > > > > If you take that code (demo.html) and save it as demo.rhtml. Then view > > > demo.rhtml under rails using Firefox 3.0.1, you might see the the > > > resize problem. > > > Nope, it is still 400px when serverd from rails (2.1.0) > > > Regards, > > Rimantas > > --http://rimantas.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---