I''m buying a laptop, and I''m trying to decide between a Mac or some other laptop with Linux. I''ve always been a windows user, and I really want to try something different. If it weren''t for Textmate, I''d probably have already gone the pc route (I''ve only used Netbeans on windows, and that''s probably what I''d use on Linux). How superior is Textmate to Netbeans, and is it worth buying a Mac for? Thanks! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
hello kyle, im currently using both. a mac and a pc laptop generally, it works well under each platform. my personal disaffection under win32 is the command line with some disadvantages. commonly, all tutorials, best practices and useful helpers etc. pp. are based on a mac(unix) platform, so you have to rethink on a win32 platform in some cases shortly: the best and quickest way is the mac way best regards On 21 Aug., 07:41, Kyle Murphy <rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I''m buying a laptop, and I''m trying to decide between a Mac or some > other laptop with Linux. I''ve always been a windows user, and I really > want to try something different. > > If it weren''t for Textmate, I''d probably have already gone the pc route > (I''ve only used Netbeans on windows, and that''s probably what I''d use on > Linux). How superior is Textmate to Netbeans, and is it worth buying a > Mac for? > > Thanks! > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> shortly: the best and quickest way is the mac waynot the best but definitely the quickest, and most expensive. With mac, (and im sure to get a wave of complaints my way for this comment) you get same quality machine for double the price. You pay for pretty... and you pay a LOT. i just bought a dell, standard crappy pc with the same specs as a macbook for a third of the money, and i really cant see why i would have spent more on it. Its a work tool, not a statement of personality or image. I installed ubuntu which happens to be free, with gedit also free and a couple of plugins (i cant stress it out enough FREE!) and voila! a textmate clone with unix console and all the speed i want for ruby, rails and small files in general... uuhuhuh theres more: my media player, office, fpt, mounter, parallels... its all installed by default FOR FREE. and if you want flashy graphics (coz you are just one of those that can live if their desktops dont switch with an animation) you have plenty more customizable, better, faster animations in ubuntu. sure it has problems, but so does mac. i wanted a mac, but couldnt afford it, now i am usig ubuntu, and cant see why id switch to mac. by the way, someone is gonna complaint that this conversations does not belong here... im sorry wolas On Aug 21, 7:26 am, inriz <matthias.zirnst...-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org> wrote:> hello kyle, > > im currently using both. a mac and a pc laptop > generally, it works well under each platform. > my personal disaffection under win32 is the > command line with some disadvantages. > > commonly, all tutorials, best practices and useful helpers etc. pp. > are based on a mac(unix) platform, so you have > to rethink on a win32 platform in some cases > > shortly: the best and quickest way is the mac way > > best regards > > On 21 Aug., 07:41, Kyle Murphy <rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> > wrote: > > > I''m buying a laptop, and I''m trying to decide between a Mac or some > > other laptop with Linux. I''ve always been a windows user, and I really > > want to try something different. > > > If it weren''t for Textmate, I''d probably have already gone the pc route > > (I''ve only used Netbeans on windows, and that''s probably what I''d use on > > Linux). How superior is Textmate to Netbeans, and is it worth buying a > > Mac for? > > > Thanks! > > -- > > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Kyle Murphy wrote:> I''m buying a laptop, and I''m trying to decide between a Mac or some > other laptop with Linux. I''ve always been a windows user, and I really > want to try something different. > > If it weren''t for Textmate, I''d probably have already gone the pc route > (I''ve only used Netbeans on windows, and that''s probably what I''d use on > Linux). How superior is Textmate to Netbeans, and is it worth buying a > Mac for? > > Thanks!As big a fan of Macs that I am (though I recognize they are not perfect), I would not say that you should buy a Mac for one application. Unless of course, there is absolutely nothing that comes even close to whatever it is you are wanting to use and you can''t get work done without it. Obviously there are many tools you can use to write Rails apps. You can use any editor you want, so you can use any platform that supports Ruby/Rails. Now, that doesn''t mean that I don''t recommend a Mac. I switched a bit less than a year and a half ago. I, like most people, had used windows at work for years and years. But I''ve never been fond of it or MS, so I had been using Linux in some form at home for about five or six years. Without going into detail, I had an experience one day that was the proverbial straw that broke the camel''s back, and I bought a Mac. There was a period of adjustment, as with most new things, but my productivity skyrocketed. In my own life, my Mac stays out of my way and lets me work. I don''t fiddle with my computer near as much as I did with Windows and Linux. My wife, who is not really computer savvy at all, has used Windows, Linux, and Mac as well, and she said she is much happier on the Mac than she ever was on anything else. In the year that she has had her iMac (she wanted a Mac after she saw mine :) ), she has increased dramatically in what she is able to figure out on her own. To kind of try to bring this back to being remotely close to on topic, Mac OS X and Ruby share what Matz calls the "Principle of Least Suprise", meaning that for the most part, things work the way you expect them to. That doesn''t mean there aren''t some oddities, but that you don''t spend a lot of time scratching your head. If you can afford a Mac, get one. TextMate is in the $50 range, which isn''t too bad, but still $$. If you find you don''t like it, you can still use NetBeans. And once you get used to the Mac, you very well might be incredibly glad you switched, regardless of what tool you use for development. And if you find that you don''t like it, Macs do a pretty good job of holding their resale value (from what I''ve read). It''s unlikely that you''d have too much trouble getting rid of it. Oh, and last I heard, all members of the Rails core team used Macs. If that means anything to you. Peace, Phillip -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>i just bought a dell, standard crappy pc > with the same specs as a macbook for a third of the money, and i > really cant see why i would have spent more on it.Hi, would you mind to share the specs of your Dell machine and the 3x more expensive Mac it compares too? Thanks, Rimantas -- http://rimantas.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
My advice to someone thinking about buying a Mac is to just sit down with one for a while. You can either go to the Apple store, or borrow''s a friends laptop. Take some time getting used to the UI (if you''re coming in cold it could feel very weird for a while) and sit and try to do some work on it. If you don''t think the experience is that much better than Windows or Linux, then don''t buy a Mac. Most people love their Macs because they consider them a superior computing experience. If you''re not getting that, then don''t spend the extra dough. Although, do remember that a Mac can actually run all three OSes, so you can have your pick of OS X, Windows or Linux any time. As for Netbeans vs. Textmate - I prefer Textmate, but I would classify it as an all around text editor that has great support for a wide variety of programming tasks (language bundles, subversion/git integration, etc). It''s more of a generalist''s tool. Netbeans, which I''ve used only briefly, appears to provide a more straightforward IDE experience that you may be more accustomed to. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
If you don''t own a mac, you can''t say it''s just a more expensive clone. I did Rails development on a PC using either win or linux (ubuntu) for over two years. My mac paid for itself in less than a day with the increased productivity. It''s more than just textmate, it''s how everything works together. Side-by-side comparisons of hardware are only the beginning, and I will admit I fought the mac for a long time before I broke down and bought one. Price is a rough thing to get over. I personally find a Mac to be a more productive work machine. I could do all of it cheaper with a Dell, but I have to spend all the time configuring my Rails environment on it. Windows works for Rails, but it''s slow, and there are missing things in Ruby that windows just can''t do. Linux requires that you set up Ruby, gems, and Rails either by using a package manager or by a hybrid of source / gems / libraries just to get it how you want it. And I can''t *yet* use Photoshop CS3 on my Linux machine. I kinda need that to work. With the mac, I was working on my projects in less than an hour after unboxing. Assume I paid $2400 for my macbook with a 3 year AppleCare plan. Now assume I had to pay $800 for my laptop from Dell that was comparable. Now assume my hourly rate is $150 an hour as Obie''s "Do the Hustle" presentation suggested it should be, but I can''t start doing billable work until my machine is set up. So for every hour I spend configuring my Dell, I could be billable. How long would it take to make up that cost difference? It comes down to efficiency and I don''t think that''s clear unless you own a mac. Just like with Rails - people happily doing .net or Java just don''t ''get'' why we''d use Rails. We know why, but they won''t until they try it. Just my thoughts. I could be wrong. On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Rimantas Liubertas <rimantas-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>wrote:> > >i just bought a dell, standard crappy pc > > with the same specs as a macbook for a third of the money, and i > > really cant see why i would have spent more on it. > > Hi, would you mind to share the specs of your Dell machine and the 3x > more expensive Mac it compares too? > Thanks, > > > Rimantas > -- > http://rimantas.com/ > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Ubuntu with rails.vim :) Ubuntu''s graphics are pretty cool. Quite buggy when trying to watch Apple videos and stuff (.mov, .m4v) but overall worth it. I''m very happy with Ubuntu Hardy Heron. On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Kyle Murphy <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > I''m buying a laptop, and I''m trying to decide between a Mac or some > other laptop with Linux. I''ve always been a windows user, and I really > want to try something different. > > If it weren''t for Textmate, I''d probably have already gone the pc route > (I''ve only used Netbeans on windows, and that''s probably what I''d use on > Linux). How superior is Textmate to Netbeans, and is it worth buying a > Mac for? > > Thanks! > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.-- Ramon Tayag --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> Hi, would you mind to share the specs of your Dell machine and the 3x > more expensive Mac it compares too?Dell Vostro 1510 3gb RAM, Core2Duo 1.8GHz. Very similar to a 8 month old MacBook 2Gb RAM with 1.8 GHz. Dell: £ 250 Mac: £ 800> If you don''t own a mac, you can''t say it''s just a more expensive clone.I do own a mac. I am allowed to say it now?> Linux requires that you set up Ruby, gems, and Rails either by using > a package manager or by a hybrid of source / gems / libraries just to > get it how you want itmac requires a 1.5 GB download (developers pack) just to even start downloading ruby and rails (which ive heard will come by default soon) ubuntu comes fully configured. all you have to do is: sudo apt-get install ruby-full sudo gem install rails good to go... Coming back to the TextMate topic, TextMate is a FAR SUPERIOR text editor than Gedit or NetBeans (which i used very briefly) it has the best code highlighting, file browser and snippet system. it is fast small and powerful, and i would happily pay $ 50 for a copy for ubuntu. Fortunately, Gedit does a pretty good job at it, just follow any blog post that says gedit like TextMate and you will have just saved $ 50. I have still to hear of an example of exactly what is it that increases productivity on a fully set up mac versus a linux box. I turn on my computer, click 3 times and im coding away, im sure mac users have the same advantage, but it is the SAME advantage, not better.> Oh, and last I heard, all members of the Rails core team used Macs. If > that means anything to you.I live with a member of ruby-core who uses windows (admittedly, he just bought a mac), so no, not all of them do. The best ive heard here is: Try it yourself, its the only way. On Aug 21, 11:38 am, "Rimantas Liubertas" <riman...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> >i just bought a dell, standard crappy pc > > with the same specs as a macbook for a third of the money, and i > > really cant see why i would have spent more on it. > > Hi, would you mind to share the specs of your Dell machine and the 3x > more expensive Mac it compares too? > Thanks, > > Rimantas > --http://rimantas.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 21 Aug 2008, at 15:56, Wolas! wrote:> mac requires a 1.5 GB download (developers pack) just to even start > downloading ruby and rails (which ive heard will come by default soon)The developers tools are included on the install dvd and RoR already comes by default since the release of Leopard, which has been quite some time now. On your comparison, in all honesty you cannot compare a discontinued MacBook model at the full price it was back in those days to that Dell laptop. If Apple were to sell it now, it would probably be far less than the £800 (which is in fact the price of a 2.4 Ghz model nowadays) you''re mentioning. I really don''t like it when people don''t get their facts straight. But I wish you all the best with your nice little airplane you bought ;-) Best regards Peter De Berdt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 21 Aug 2008, at 14:56, Wolas! wrote:> >> Hi, would you mind to share the specs of your Dell machine and the 3x >> more expensive Mac it compares too? > > Dell Vostro 1510 3gb RAM, Core2Duo 1.8GHz. > > > Very similar to a 8 month old MacBook 2Gb RAM with 1.8 GHz. > > Dell: £ 250 > Mac: £ 800 >a new entry level macbook is £700 (2.1Ghz Core2Duo (the kind with 3Mb L2 cache) (comes with only 1gig of ram, but that second gig can be added cheaply) I configured a M1330 (their only 13.3 inch one) similarly and came up with £756 (you could a bit off if you decided you didn''t want bluetooth, 802.11n) a similarly configured inspiron 1525, which appears to be their budget model was £558 (didn''t seem have a 2.1 ghz processor for this one). Clearly your one was a bargain even for a dell.>> If you don''t own a mac, you can''t say it''s just a more expensive >> clone. > > I do own a mac. I am allowed to say it now? > > >> Linux requires that you set up Ruby, gems, and Rails either by using >> a package manager or by a hybrid of source / gems / libraries just to >> get it how you want it > > > mac requires a 1.5 GB download (developers pack) just to even start > downloading ruby and rails (which ive heard will come by default soon) >Check your facts. the dev tools come on a disk with the machine, no download needed rails and ruby are part of that (probably not the base install). rails is version 1.2.6 though Fred> ubuntu comes fully configured. all you have to do is: > > sudo apt-get install ruby-full > sudo gem install rails > > good to go... > > Coming back to the TextMate topic, TextMate is a FAR SUPERIOR text > editor than Gedit or NetBeans (which i used very briefly) it has the > best code highlighting, file browser and snippet system. it is fast > small and powerful, and i would happily pay $ 50 for a copy for > ubuntu. Fortunately, Gedit does a pretty good job at it, just follow > any blog post that says gedit like TextMate and you will have just > saved $ 50. > > I have still to hear of an example of exactly what is it that > increases productivity on a fully set up mac versus a linux box. I > turn on my computer, click 3 times and im coding away, im sure mac > users have the same advantage, but it is the SAME advantage, not > better. > >> Oh, and last I heard, all members of the Rails core team used Macs. >> If >> that means anything to you. > > I live with a member of ruby-core who uses windows (admittedly, he > just bought a mac), so no, not all of them do.rails-core, not ruby-core. Fred> > > The best ive heard here is: Try it yourself, its the only way. > > On Aug 21, 11:38 am, "Rimantas Liubertas" <riman...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>> i just bought a dell, standard crappy pc >>> with the same specs as a macbook for a third of the money, and i >>> really cant see why i would have spent more on it. >> >> Hi, would you mind to share the specs of your Dell machine and the 3x >> more expensive Mac it compares too? >> Thanks, >> >> Rimantas >> --http://rimantas.com/ > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> I really don''t like it when people don''t get their > facts straight. But I wish you all the best with your nice little > airplane you bought ;-)You are right, and i am absolutely wrong. I am so sorry guys to waste your time. Since i cant get my facts straight, i have to say i will turn off my computer and dedicate the rest of my life to research into laptop prices. thanks for the heads up peter! just for a brief price comparison my dell £ 300 2 months ago (on release with a 1gb RAM update offer) 3 Gb RAm 1.8 Intel Core2Duo 250 Gb disk MacBook (Today) £ 849 2 Gb RAM 2.1 Intel Core3Duo 250 Gb disk yes its 2 months difference (facts right, i am learning!), but £ 600, means i can get a laptop AND a desktop for the price of a macBook. my little aeroplane is doing just great. hope you, your mac and your ego live happily everafter. On Aug 21, 3:08 pm, Peter De Berdt <peter.de.be...-LPO8gxj9N8aZIoH1IeqzKA@public.gmane.org> wrote:> On 21 Aug 2008, at 15:56, Wolas! wrote: > > > mac requires a 1.5 GB download (developers pack) just to even start > > downloading ruby and rails (which ive heard will come by default soon) > > The developers tools are included on the install dvd and RoR already > comes by default since the release of Leopard, which has been quite > some time now. > > On your comparison, in all honesty you cannot compare a discontinued > MacBook model at the full price it was back in those days to that Dell > laptop. If Apple were to sell it now, it would probably be far less > than the £800 (which is in fact the price of a 2.4 Ghz model nowadays) > you''re mentioning. I really don''t like it when people don''t get their > facts straight. But I wish you all the best with your nice little > airplane you bought ;-) > > Best regards > > Peter De Berdt--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Uhh! one more thing before the next wave of complaints. i didnt pay for windows vista (thats the whole point) ... so knock off £ 100 - £ 150 of your retail price. On Aug 21, 3:28 pm, "\"Wolas!\"" <jcpen...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > I really don''t like it when people don''t get their > > facts straight. But I wish you all the best with your nice little > > airplane you bought ;-) > > You are right, and i am absolutely wrong. I am so sorry guys to waste > your time. Since i cant get my facts straight, i have to say i will > turn off my computer and dedicate the rest of my life to research into > laptop prices. thanks for the heads up peter! > > just for a brief price comparison > > my dell £ 300 2 months ago (on release with a 1gb RAM update offer) > 3 Gb RAm > 1.8 Intel Core2Duo > 250 Gb disk > > MacBook (Today) £ 849 > 2 Gb RAM > 2.1 Intel Core3Duo > 250 Gb disk > > yes its 2 months difference (facts right, i am learning!), but £ 600, > means i can get a laptop AND a desktop for the price of a macBook. > > my little aeroplane is doing just great. hope you, your mac and your > ego live happily everafter. > > On Aug 21, 3:08 pm, Peter De Berdt <peter.de.be...-LPO8gxj9N8aZIoH1IeqzKA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > On 21 Aug 2008, at 15:56, Wolas! wrote: > > > > mac requires a 1.5 GB download (developers pack) just to even start > > > downloading ruby and rails (which ive heard will come by default soon) > > > The developers tools are included on the install dvd and RoR already > > comes by default since the release of Leopard, which has been quite > > some time now. > > > On your comparison, in all honesty you cannot compare a discontinued > > MacBook model at the full price it was back in those days to that Dell > > laptop. If Apple were to sell it now, it would probably be far less > > than the £800 (which is in fact the price of a 2.4 Ghz model nowadays) > > you''re mentioning. I really don''t like it when people don''t get their > > facts straight. But I wish you all the best with your nice little > > airplane you bought ;-) > > > Best regards > > > Peter De Berdt--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Hello, I was doing most of my work on Windows and got sick of how slow Ruby was specifically and Windows in general. I switched to Ubuntu and am quite happy. One pet peeve, is that I''d been using PCs for so long, when I go to close a window on my Mac, I habitually mouse to the right side of the window, only to get annoyed and then mouse to the left. If this habit is deeply ingrained in you and you think it may be difficult to break, things like this make Gnome a bit more appealing. This is not saying anything about absolute value to the respective interfaces, Gnome just suits my existing habits better. I think you can do fine development either way. I''m starting to try to assemble an emacs/rails set up and I suspect that would bring a high level of functionality that approaches textmate''s. There are several blog posts out there about it. I think the biggest pro for a linux system is that you''re often deploying to a linux server. Apple''s bsd base is close, but your linux flavor is likely closer or the same. The biggest downside to a linux system I''ve noticed is that most tutorials are done on a Mac. If you can get over this, its not a big deal. Also if you do test driven development, growl is a nice utility that is only Mac. I have not been able to get an equivalent working on Ubuntu yet. Vis a vis rails development, how much is having the same OS as the tutorials and Growl worth? For some alot, others not so much. Are there other features some may point out that are better or Mac only specific to Rails? On Aug 21, 1:41 am, Kyle Murphy <rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I''m buying a laptop, and I''m trying to decide between a Mac or some > other laptop with Linux. I''ve always been a windows user, and I really > want to try something different. > > If it weren''t for Textmate, I''d probably have already gone the pc route > (I''ve only used Netbeans on windows, and that''s probably what I''d use on > Linux). How superior is Textmate to Netbeans, and is it worth buying a > Mac for? > > Thanks! > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
I''d go with the Ubuntu laptop from Dell. I am running rails on windows, mac, linux/ubuntu, and linux/suse and the ubuntu is my favorite in terms of price and performance. That said, if you''re going to do other things you may want to go with the Mac which is better for music and video. I see no reason to use Windows if you don''t have to. Kyle Murphy wrote:> I''m buying a laptop, and I''m trying to decide between a Mac or some > other laptop with Linux. I''ve always been a windows user, and I really > want to try something different. > > If it weren''t for Textmate, I''d probably have already gone the pc route > (I''ve only used Netbeans on windows, and that''s probably what I''d use on > Linux). How superior is Textmate to Netbeans, and is it worth buying a > Mac for? > > Thanks! > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
This discussion (whenever it comes up) truly annoys me. This is such a simple concept and so many people just don''t seem to get it. Some people buy BMW''s or Mercedes-Benz and won''t buy anything else. If you ask them why, they have no technical argument that can truly explain their reasoning. A higher line car performs exactly the same task as any other automobile. It has essentially the same parts, very similar features, there''s nothing compelling about any particular features of them. So there are two possibilities that I see. (1) These people are just completely insane and have lost all grip on reality, or (2) there is something aesthetically appealing about a higher line vehicle (or computer) that can''t be shown in some feature vs price comparison chart. At the end of the day. Use the tool that works for you. Don''t let other people''s opinions cloud your judgement. They are not you! They have their own opinions and feeling that are independent from yours. As a Mac (and Mercedes-Benz) owner myself I highly recommend them. But, Rails is not the "killer app" that should drive your opinion. Look at the whole package, feel it, touch it, then form your own opinions and run with them. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Robert Walker <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Some people buy BMW''s or Mercedes-Benz and won''t buy anything else. If > you ask them why, they have no technical argument that can truly explain > their reasoning. A higher line car performs exactly the same task as any > other automobile. It has essentially the same parts, very similar > features, there''s nothing compelling about any particular features of > them. > > So there are two possibilities that I see. (1) These people are just > completely insane and have lost all grip on reality, or (2) there is > something aesthetically appealing about a higher line vehicle (or > computer) that can''t be shown in some feature vs price comparison chart. > > At the end of the day. Use the tool that works for you. Don''t let other > people''s opinions cloud your judgement. They are not you! They have > their own opinions and feeling that are independent from yours. > > As a Mac (and Mercedes-Benz) owner myself I highly recommend them. But, > Rails is not the "killer app" that should drive your opinion. Look at > the whole package, feel it, touch it, then form your own opinions and > run with them.Agreed on everything (a BMW owner over here BTW :-). Also take into account that you just can''t run Mac OS X on anything else than a Mac (except for hacks). The operating system itself is something that may be relevant in the choice. Either at the SO level if you are hardcore, or at a user experience level anyway. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Wow, lots of good input. I appreciate it. Let''s say I went the Mac route -- what''s the difference between a MacBook Pro and MacBook? I can get a decent price with a MacBook. I''ll only be using it for web surfing, coding, Photoshop, and basic text editing -- no gaming. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Kyle Murphy wrote:> Wow, lots of good input. I appreciate it. > > Let''s say I went the Mac route -- what''s the difference between a > MacBook Pro and MacBook?I went with the MBP because of the 17" screen option. I like lots of real estate. Here are three links that you might like to read (for others, google "macbook pro" macbook difference) http://www.nudjit.com/2008/03/04/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/ http://alexking.org/blog/2006/05/18/macbook-vs-macbook-pro http://www.macnewsworld.com/story/61938.html Please note that I have not read any of these. They were the first ones returned by Google that appeared to be related to the discussion. Peace, Phillip -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Kyle Murphy pisze:> I''m buying a laptop, and I''m trying to decide between a Mac or some > other laptop with Linux. I''ve always been a windows user, and I really > want to try something different. > > If it weren''t for Textmate, I''d probably have already gone the pc route > (I''ve only used Netbeans on windows, and that''s probably what I''d use on > Linux). How superior is Textmate to Netbeans, and is it worth buying a > Mac for? > > Thanks! >Buy books not laptops.... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 21 Aug 2008, at 18:07, Kyle Murphy wrote:> > Wow, lots of good input. I appreciate it. > > Let''s say I went the Mac route -- what''s the difference between a > MacBook Pro and MacBook? > > I can get a decent price with a MacBook. I''ll only be using it for > web > surfing, coding, Photoshop, and basic text editing -- no gaming.The mac book pro has a bigger screen, dedicated graphics, expresscard slot, extra firewire 800 port, doesn''t use those stupid minidvi-dvi screen outputs and has faster cpu options Sounds like it wouldn''t make much difference to you. The hard drive is a lot easier to change on the plain old macbook. Fred> > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Kyle Murphy <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I can get a decent price with a MacBook. I''ll only be using it for web > surfing, coding, Photoshop, and basic text editing -- no gaming.I tend to max out whatever I''m using, so prefer to get something with as much horsepower as possible. And Photoshop can be a serious resource hog. A point not yet mentioned in favor of the Mac is that you can test on all of the major platforms with one machine, essential if you do much traveling. I have VMware with Win/XP, W2K, Ubuntu, CentOS and OpenSolaris running on my MBP for testing purposes, and it works out great. FWIW, -- Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroeder-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Fact is, ruby and rails work best on *nix-based systems. Take your pick: Mac OSX or GNU/Linux. Ruby & Rails on Windows is a PITA. Slow, many extensions don''t work or need some surgery to work, weak non-standard "shell" (windows'' fault), etc, not to say that all tutorials and books take *nix based system as the default platform (Mac or Linux). Mac is mostly aesthetics. It is cool, pretty works nicely and is stable (underlying BSD core). But so is Ubuntu (GNU/Linux). Now, for the people that says that coming pre-installed with ruby and rails is a big advantage, please, stop. It is okay to be lazy, but this is just too silly. If you are using a mainstream distro. such as Ubuntu, setting up a Rails environment is as easy as it is on Mac OSX. It is okay to have a Mac, but please, be pragmatic and don''t turn yourself into a fanboy. Marcelo. On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Phillip Koebbe < rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > Kyle Murphy wrote: > > Wow, lots of good input. I appreciate it. > > > > Let''s say I went the Mac route -- what''s the difference between a > > MacBook Pro and MacBook? > > I went with the MBP because of the 17" screen option. I like lots of > real estate. > > Here are three links that you might like to read (for others, google > "macbook pro" macbook difference) > > http://www.nudjit.com/2008/03/04/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/ > http://alexking.org/blog/2006/05/18/macbook-vs-macbook-pro > http://www.macnewsworld.com/story/61938.html > > Please note that I have not read any of these. They were the first ones > returned by Google that appeared to be related to the discussion. > > Peace, > Phillip > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Well put, Marcello. I work on a Windows machine and it gets the job done. I do encounter some incompatibility issues occasionally, but most of the time it is resolvable; except for background-rb unfortunately. It''s been a while since I did a fresh Rails setup, but it definitely took longer than what everyone is describing for Mac/Nix machines; everything is moving along nicely now though. Anyway, before I ever dished out the money for a Mac, I would probably just reformat with a quick Ubuntu install. Really my machine is just a tool, a means to an end. As long as it does what I need it to, I don''t see a need to upgrade my system. On Aug 21, 12:45 pm, "Marcelo de Moraes Serpa" <celose...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Fact is, ruby and rails work best on *nix-based systems. Take your pick: Mac > OSX or GNU/Linux. > > Ruby & Rails on Windows is a PITA. Slow, many extensions don''t work or need > some surgery to work, weak non-standard "shell" (windows'' fault), etc, not > to say that all tutorials and books take *nix based system as the default > platform (Mac or Linux). > > Mac is mostly aesthetics. It is cool, pretty works nicely and is stable > (underlying BSD core). But so is Ubuntu (GNU/Linux). > > Now, for the people that says that coming pre-installed with ruby and rails > is a big advantage, please, stop. It is okay to be lazy, but this is just > too silly. If you are using a mainstream distro. such as Ubuntu, setting up > a Rails environment is as easy as it is on Mac OSX. > > It is okay to have a Mac, but please, be pragmatic and don''t turn yourself > into a fanboy. > > Marcelo. > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Phillip Koebbe < > > rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > Kyle Murphy wrote: > > > Wow, lots of good input. I appreciate it. > > > > Let''s say I went the Mac route -- what''s the difference between a > > > MacBook Pro and MacBook? > > > I went with the MBP because of the 17" screen option. I like lots of > > real estate. > > > Here are three links that you might like to read (for others, google > > "macbook pro" macbook difference) > > >http://www.nudjit.com/2008/03/04/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/ > >http://alexking.org/blog/2006/05/18/macbook-vs-macbook-pro > >http://www.macnewsworld.com/story/61938.html > > > Please note that I have not read any of these. They were the first ones > > returned by Google that appeared to be related to the discussion. > > > Peace, > > Phillip > > -- > > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> Anyway, before I ever dished out the money for a Mac, I would probably > just reformat with a quick Ubuntu install. Really my machine is just a > tool, a means to an end. As long as it does what I need it to, I don''t > see a need to upgrade my system.This really highlights my earlier post. For many people their computer is "just a tool." There''s nothing wrong with at all. However, for some of us our computers are quite a bit more than that. For me it''s my life, my passion, my career. I spend a lot of time behind a computer screen, whether it be for work, entertainment, communication, or whatever. When I do anything with my computer I don''t want to be surprised every time something actually works as expected. I''d rather be surprised when something breaks. As for me, my Mac delivers this experience. If that make me a "fanboy," well so be it (as much as I hate the stupid term)! jasoo24 wrote:> Well put, Marcello. > > I work on a Windows machine and it gets the job done. I do encounter > some incompatibility issues occasionally, but most of the time it is > resolvable; except for background-rb unfortunately. It''s been a while > since I did a fresh Rails setup, but it definitely took longer than > what everyone is describing for Mac/Nix machines; everything is moving > along nicely now though. > > Anyway, before I ever dished out the money for a Mac, I would probably > just reformat with a quick Ubuntu install. Really my machine is just a > tool, a means to an end. As long as it does what I need it to, I don''t > see a need to upgrade my system. > > On Aug 21, 12:45 pm, "Marcelo de Moraes Serpa" <celose...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Although textmate is a great tool, you can''t compare it to an ide like NetBeans. Netbeans is by far superior, unless you like having to open multiple windows to do your work, setup databases, and install plugins. The real necessity for getting a Mac for rails is the fact that its a unix box and there''s a huge variety of utilities available for rails on mac. On Aug 21, 1:41 am, Kyle Murphy <rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I''m buying a laptop, and I''m trying to decide between a Mac or some > other laptop with Linux. I''ve always been a windows user, and I really > want to try something different. > > If it weren''t for Textmate, I''d probably have already gone the pc route > (I''ve only used Netbeans on windows, and that''s probably what I''d use on > Linux). How superior is Textmate to Netbeans, and is it worth buying a > Mac for? > > Thanks! > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
chrgra wrote:> unless you like having to open multiple windows to > do your work, setup databases, and install pluginsAs crazy as this may sound to some people, yes, there are those of us who would rather have multiple windows open. Peace, Phillip -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 22 Aug 2008, at 19:32, Phillip Koebbe <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org > wrote:> > chrgra wrote: >> unless you like having to open multiple windows to >> do your work, setup databases, and install plugins > > As crazy as this may sound to some people, yes, there are those of us > who would rather have multiple windows open. >Same here. I can''t stand ides where you have all these little docked panes rather than a bunch of windows. Apart from anything else spreading 1 window across 3 screens doesn''t really work. Fred> Peace, > Phillip > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
I also have better things to do with my time than waiting for a big bloated Java IDE to launch. I use one of these bloated IDE every day at work to do Java. I didn''t realize how much pain I was actually in, until I started developing Rails applications in TextMate. It''s like a dream when I want to edit a file "mate file.rb" and BAM I''m editing my file. What a concept. Yes, IDEs provide code completion, refactoring, etc. I used to think that mattered, until I realized that it was actually Java that made that stuff so vitally important. Ruby, IMHO, just makes all that go away. It''s not the entering of the code that I need help with. It''s what the Rails framework provides that make 90% of that boiler plate code go way that''s important. Once that happens, all those heavily touted IDE feature are reduced to insignificance. All I really care about with Ruby is having a great text editor that helps me edit text. I''m the programmer, let me worry about the API. But, that''s just me.... Frederick Cheung wrote:> On 22 Aug 2008, at 19:32, Phillip Koebbe > <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org > > wrote: > >> >> chrgra wrote: >>> unless you like having to open multiple windows to >>> do your work, setup databases, and install plugins >> >> As crazy as this may sound to some people, yes, there are those of us >> who would rather have multiple windows open. >> > > Same here. I can''t stand ides where you have all these little docked > panes rather than a bunch of windows. Apart from anything else > spreading 1 window across 3 screens doesn''t really work. > > Fred-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>Ruby & Rails on Windows is a PITA. SlowTell me about it, there are even gems that don''t work correctly on windows (like gd2). I am stuck with windows because there is no good (read: cheap) online backup software for linux yet. I run andLinux and it runs my rails app almost as fast as my linode does. I have a full ubuntu installation sitting on top of windoze - best of both worlds. I wouldn''t dream of buying a mac because my sub-$1k homebrew computer would be over $4k if I bought the mac version. It might be a little better, but it''s hard to justify the exorbant cost when the difference in productivity for most people is negligable. </$0.02> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa < celoserpa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Fact is, ruby and rails work best on *nix-based systems. Take your pick: > Mac OSX or GNU/Linux. > > Ruby & Rails on Windows is a PITA. Slow, many extensions don''t work or need > some surgery to work, weak non-standard "shell" (windows'' fault), etc, not > to say that all tutorials and books take *nix based system as the default > platform (Mac or Linux). > > Mac is mostly aesthetics. It is cool, pretty works nicely and is stable > (underlying BSD core). But so is Ubuntu (GNU/Linux). > > Now, for the people that says that coming pre-installed with ruby and rails > is a big advantage, please, stop. It is okay to be lazy, but this is just > too silly. If you are using a mainstream distro. such as Ubuntu, setting up > a Rails environment is as easy as it is on Mac OSX. > > It is okay to have a Mac, but please, be pragmatic and don''t turn yourself > into a fanboy. > > Marcelo. > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Phillip Koebbe < > rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> >> Kyle Murphy wrote: >> > Wow, lots of good input. I appreciate it. >> > >> > Let''s say I went the Mac route -- what''s the difference between a >> > MacBook Pro and MacBook? >> >> I went with the MBP because of the 17" screen option. I like lots of >> real estate. >> >> Here are three links that you might like to read (for others, google >> "macbook pro" macbook difference) >> >> http://www.nudjit.com/2008/03/04/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/ >> http://alexking.org/blog/2006/05/18/macbook-vs-macbook-pro >> http://www.macnewsworld.com/story/61938.html >> >> Please note that I have not read any of these. They were the first ones >> returned by Google that appeared to be related to the discussion. >> >> Peace, >> Phillip >> -- >> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >> >> >> > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---