Dear all,
I am doing programming in ruby on rails platform from last three
months . I have spent my last two years in PHP programming where i
developed many shopping carts. I used to make a different section for
a normal web site user and special section for administrator. The
files i used in administrator section were all different than those in
normal users view.
Now i have a problem to manage same thing in ruby in rails. Should
i manage as what i did in PHP? Is there any standard for managing it?
I feel it is not good to let administrator edit the data from the
normal users section because we have to spend lot of time maintaining
the design rather than focusing on the logic.
Please suggest me with the best possible solution for this.
Regards
Realusers
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Lots of different ways you could tackle this. I think there isn''t so much a "rails standard"... but probably some best practices... or "good ideas" at least. Lets see... off the top of my head: - namespace admin functionality, both for controllers and views. - use role-based hooks to define additional checks or functions on existing controllers - and use an "admin" layout for them - use something like ActiveScaffold for admin views... provides very nice data management - build a separate admin app that uses the same DB (but otherwise is a totally separate rails app) - punt and use some other DB management tools (for example, on a very small project, I just use CocoaSQL to remotely modify data. Not very secure, but a perfect fit for the specific project & needs). Interestingly, I haven''t done any good full-blown admin suites yet. I''m working on a large project that will need a very rich admin suite. I''m starting to think that the admin suite may be big enough and different enough that it will make more sense to run it as a totally separate app... probably even on a separate domain. And maybe do some funkiness with DBs so that it has some admin tables but also full access to the public app''s tables. The only downside is how to leverage the various code from the public app? Hmmm... maybe the public app is "vendor''d" into the admin app? I guess I too welcome any other thoughts. -Danimal On May 16, 12:11 am, Realusers <pandeybishn...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Dear all, > I am doing programming in ruby on rails platform from last three > months . I have spent my last two years in PHP programming where i > developed many shopping carts. I used to make a different section for > a normal web site user and special section for administrator. The > files i used in administrator section were all different than those in > normal users view. > Now i have a problem to manage same thing in ruby in rails. Should > i manage as what i did in PHP? Is there any standard for managing it? > I feel it is not good to let administrator edit the data from the > normal users section because we have to spend lot of time maintaining > the design rather than focusing on the logic. > > Please suggest me with the best possible solution for this. > > Regards > Realusers--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Danimal wrote:> Lots of different ways you could tackle this. I think there isn''t so > much a "rails standard"... but probably some best practices... or > "good ideas" at least. >Being the lead developer, and a user, and (at least initially) the admin, I see no reason not to give the admin the same nice interface for our intranet app. My app uses a specific _left-nav-admin partial for anyone with the administrator role which provides the links to all the admin features (users, roles, teams, memberships, permissions, etc), and the controllers for those models are all locked down with appropriate before_filter settings checking for the admin role. There is also the fail-safe "Iron Admin" login (created specially in migration 001) that no login other than the Iron Admin is allowed to tinker with (no changing his roles, password, e-mail, etc), even if your login has been granted the admin role. That login isn''t a member of any "user" teams either. Out in the "users" data realm, all logins are subject to the same rules as everyone else. It''s worked out pretty well, and I''ve used the Iron Admin to create data that other user''s can review online, or generate a PDF for hardcopy (like an online example/tutorial for the application), but no-one else can edit or delete that data due to ownership rules. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---