I am trying to create a dynamic menu using the following construct:
<%- menu_list = [ ''first'', ''second'',
''third''] -%>
<ul>
<%- menu_list.each do |m| -%>
<%= link_to "List All #{m.titlecase.pluralize} <m>_path %>
<%- end -%>
</ul>
What I cannot determine is what I have to do to replace <m> so that the
link_to has a target. I have tried string substitution ("#{m}"_path)
but that gives a compile error:
_erbout.concat(( link_to "List All #{m.titlecase.pluralize}",
("#{m}"_path) ).to_s); _erbout.concat "
I am sure that there must be a fairly straight forward way to do this.
Can someone point it out to me?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On May 1, 2008, at 20:58 , James Byrne wrote:> <%- menu_list = [ ''first'', ''second'', ''third''] -%> > > <ul> > <%- menu_list.each do |m| -%> > <%= link_to "List All #{m.titlecase.pluralize} <m>_path %> > <%- end -%> > </ul> > > > What I cannot determine is what I have to do to replace <m> so that > the > link_to has a target.You can get it this way: <%= link_to "List All #{m.titlecase.pluralize}", send("#{m}_path") %> Nevertheless in this case I tend to see repetition as a better option. Compare the above to this crystal clear <%= link_to "List All Firsts", first_path %> <%= link_to "List All Seconds", second_path %> <%= link_to "List All Thirds", third_path %> If you have 35 of those then fine, but for a handful of them I find copy & paste gives better code. -- fxn --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Xavier Noria wrote:> On May 1, 2008, at 20:58 , James Byrne wrote: > >> the >> link_to has a target. > > You can get it this way: > > <%= link_to "List All #{m.titlecase.pluralize}", send("#{m}_path") > %> > > Nevertheless in this case I tend to see repetition as a better option. > Compare the above to this crystal clear > > <%= link_to "List All Firsts", first_path %> > <%= link_to "List All Seconds", second_path %> > <%= link_to "List All Thirds", third_path %> > > If you have 35 of those then fine, but for a handful of them I find > copy & paste gives better code. > > -- fxnThank you. My example was cut down to the essentials to avoid clutter and focus on the my present issue. There are many related bits to each ''m'' that have a similar construction so that meta programming this represents a clear advantage over cut and paste. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Now I have a related question. Some of these methods may or may not
have routes depending upon when and where they are invoked. So, I have a
guard conditional set up:
<%- role_list.each do |m| -%>
<li> <%= "#{m.titlecase}" %>
<%= if defined? "#{m.pluralize}_path" then
link_to "List All #{m.titlecase.pluralize}",
send("#{m.pluralize}_path")
else
nil
end %>
</li>
<%- end -%>
When the guard is explicit ( if defined? firsts_path then ...) this
works. But I do not know how to test for a dynamically formed method
name. How is this done in Ruby?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
2008/5/1 James Byrne <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>:> Now I have a related question. Some of these methods may or may not > have routes depending upon when and where they are invoked. So, I have a > guard conditional set up: > > <%- role_list.each do |m| -%> > <li> <%= "#{m.titlecase}" %> > > <%= if defined? "#{m.pluralize}_path" then> When the guard is explicit ( if defined? firsts_path then ...) this > works. But I do not know how to test for a dynamically formed method > name. How is this done in Ruby?Yeah, defined? is not what you want in that case: irb(main):001:0> defined? "foo" => "expression" Use respond_to? instead. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Xavier Noria wrote:> 2008/5/1 James Byrne <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>:> Yeah, defined? is not what you want in that case: > > irb(main):001:0> defined? "foo" > => "expression" > > Use respond_to? instead.Works great using either idiom: Thanks! <ul> <%- role_list.each do |m| -%> <li> <%= "#{m.titlecase}" %> <! guard against missing path method this way --> <%= link_to "List All #{m.titlecase.pluralize}", send("#{m.pluralize}_path") \ if respond_to? "#{m.pluralize}_path" %> <!-- or this way --> <%= if respond_to? "#{m.pluralize}_path" then link_to "List All #{m.titlecase.pluralize}", send("#{m.pluralize}_path") else nil end %> </li> <%- end -%> </ul> Can you explain to me the different behaviours between defined? and respond_to? in this instance. I am not clear why defined? would work with symbolized path names but not work with the same parameterized string.to_sym. Thanks again. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 11:54 PM, James Byrne <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Can you explain to me the different behaviours between defined? and > respond_to? in this instance. I am not clear why defined? would work > with symbolized path names but not work with the same parameterized > string.to_sym.respond_to? asks whether the object responds to some method. Since you want to know whether self responds to the path generator that''s the one. defined? is more generic. That''s a special operator in the sense that Ruby does *not* evaluate its argument. I don''t know the whole story (anyone?) but a posteriori defined? works at parse time or something like that to interpret the argument expression in a special way. For example, if SOME_CONSTANT is unknown defined? SOME_CONSTANT does *not* raise NameError, it does not evaluate the argument. It silently returns nil. If the constant was known it would return "constant". Check this other one for example: irb(main):004:0> a = "\n" => "\n" irb(main):005:0> defined? a.chop! => "method" irb(main):006:0> a => "\n" You see? chop! is not being called, we are just told that a responds to chop!. I''d like to provide a better explanation of defined? but don''t have Flanagan & Matz at hand. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 1 May 2008, at 23:24, Xavier Noria wrote:> > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 11:54 PM, James Byrne > <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> Can you explain to me the different behaviours between defined? and >> respond_to? in this instance. I am not clear why defined? would work >> with symbolized path names but not work with the same parameterized >> string.to_sym. > > respond_to? asks whether the object responds to some method. Since you > want to know whether self responds to the path generator that''s the > one. > > defined? is more generic. That''s a special operator in the sense that > Ruby does *not* evaluate its argument. I don''t know the whole story > (anyone?) but a posteriori defined? works at parse time or something > like that to interpret the argument expression in a special way. >defined? is a bit nuts: http://redhanded.hobix.com/inspect/methodCheckDefined.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Xavier Noria wrote:> > I''d like to provide a better explanation of defined? but don''t have > Flanagan & Matz at hand.The main point that I see here is that when I am testing for the existence of methods then I should use respond_to? and that is sufficient. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
For more on defined? see: http://redhanded.hobix.com/inspect/methodCheckDefined.html -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
I wrote too soon. I have another blank spot in my knowledge that need
filling.
This construct works:
<ul>
<%- role_list.each do |m| -%>
<li>
<%= "#{m.titlecase}" if respond_to?
"#{m.pluralize}_path" %>
<%= link_to "List All #{m.titlecase.pluralize}", \
send("#{m.pluralize}_path") if respond_to?
"#{m.pluralize}_path" %>
<%= link_to "Add New #{m.titlecase}",
send("new_#{m}_path") \
if respond_to? "#{m.pluralize}_path" %>
</li>
<%- end -%>
</ul>
and this does not:
<ul>
<%- role_list.each do |m| -%>
<li>
<!-- guard against missing path methods. We assume (that word again)
that if the ms_path exists then the new_m_path does as well.-->
<%= if respond_to? "#{m.pluralize}_path" then
"#{m.titlecase}"
link_to "List All #{m.titlecase.pluralize}",
send("#{m.pluralize}_path")
link_to "Add New #{m.titlecase}",
send("new_#{m}_path")
end -%>
</li>
<%- end -%>
</ul>
All I get in the html from this is the output of the last step in the if
block:
link_to "Add New #{m.titlecase}", send("new_#{m}_path")
This indicate that I am only getting the final return value of a Ruby
method as the entire result of the if construct. This is not what I
intend or desire so is there some way of getting each step in the if
block to produce output onto the html page?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:40 PM, James Byrne <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> <ul> > <%- role_list.each do |m| -%> > <li> > <!-- guard against missing path methods. We assume (that word again) > that if the ms_path exists then the new_m_path does as well.--> > > <%= if respond_to? "#{m.pluralize}_path" then > "#{m.titlecase}" > > link_to "List All #{m.titlecase.pluralize}", > send("#{m.pluralize}_path") > link_to "Add New #{m.titlecase}", send("new_#{m}_path") > end -%> > </li> > > <%- end -%> > </ul> > > All I get in the html from this is the output of the last step in the if > block: > > link_to "Add New #{m.titlecase}", send("new_#{m}_path") > > This indicate that I am only getting the final return value of a Ruby > method as the entire result of the if construct. This is not what I > intend or desire so is there some way of getting each step in the if > block to produce output onto the html page?if is an expression in Ruby, but the easy way to do that in ERb is <% if ... %> this that <%= link_to ... %> <% end %> Note the use of <% ... %> instead of <%= ... %>. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Xavier Noria wrote:> if is an expression in Ruby, but the easy way to do that in ERb is > > <% if ... %> > this > that > <%= link_to ... %> > <% end %> > > Note the use of <% ... %> instead of <%= ... %>.I tried that syntax first and could not get it to work. I have since discovered why. I kept leaving the trailing -%> off of the "if" statement. Sigh. Thanks again. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Me again.
Now that I have this working in a view I want to move it all out into a
pair of methods that I can call from multiple views: role_list_head and
role_list_foot. Two questions arise from this:
Where do I put these methods? In application_helper.rb,
application_controller.rb, or somewhere else?
What does the method look like? Something akin to this I expect:
@role_list_default = [''entity'', ''client'',
''employee'', ''vendor'']
def role_list_head(list=@role_list_default)
link_to ''Main Page'', :controller =>
''nav_menus''
list.each do |m|
# guard against missing path methods.
if respond_to? "#{m.pluralize}_path" then
link_to "List All #{m.titlecase.pluralize}",
send("#{m.pluralize}_path")
end
end
list.each do |m|
if respond_to? "new_#{m.}_path" then
link_to "Add New #{m.titlecase}",
send("new_#{m}_path")
end
end
end
I know that this does not work, because I tried it. But something
somewhat like this has to be the answer.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:04 PM, James Byrne <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> What does the method look like? Something akin to this I expect: > > @role_list_default = [''entity'', ''client'', ''employee'', ''vendor'']This could be a constant.> def role_list_head(list=@role_list_default) > link_to ''Main Page'', :controller => ''nav_menus'' > list.each do |m| > > # guard against missing path methods. > > if respond_to? "#{m.pluralize}_path" then > > link_to "List All #{m.titlecase.pluralize}", > send("#{m.pluralize}_path") > end > end > list.each do |m| > if respond_to? "new_#{m.}_path" then > > link_to "Add New #{m.titlecase}", send("new_#{m}_path") > end > end > end > > I know that this does not work, because I tried it. But something > somewhat like this has to be the answer.That''s view stuff so should go to a helper or to a partial. The helper would build and return a single string with HTML so that you can use it like this <%= role_list_header %> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Xavier Noria wrote:> That''s view stuff so should go to a helper or to a partial. The helper > would build and return a single string with HTML so that you can use > it like this > > <%= role_list_header %>yes, but which helper file exactly? All that I have read about helpers indicates that they are tied to a specific controller by name. I tried adding a dummy method to a file called lib/application_helper.rb but when I called the method from a view I got a missing method error. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:06 PM, James Byrne <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > That''s view stuff so should go to a helper or to a partial. The helper > > would build and return a single string with HTML so that you can use > > it like this > > > > <%= role_list_header %> > > yes, but which helper file exactly? All that I have read about helpers > indicates that they are tied to a specific controller by name. I tried > adding a dummy method to a file called lib/application_helper.rb but > when I called the method from a view I got a missing method error.There are several options, but you can just throw it into app/helpers/application_helper.rb. That file contains helpers that are available everywhere. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
James Byrne wrote: I figured out what I was doing wrong in application_helper.rb. It really helps if you put: module ApplicationHelper ... end around your code. double sigh. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:17 PM, James Byrne <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> James Byrne wrote: > > I figured out what I was doing wrong in application_helper.rb. It really > helps if you put: > > module ApplicationHelper > ... > end > > around your code. double sigh.Careful, you don''t need that file in lib, see the path in my previous post. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Xavier Noria wrote:> > Careful, you don''t need that file in lib, see the path in my previous > post.What are the implications of each. Why one place rather than the other? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 12:05 AM, James Byrne <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > Xavier Noria wrote: > > > > > Careful, you don''t need that file in lib, see the path in my previous > > post. > > What are the implications of each. Why one place rather than the other?Because app/helpers is the directory where helpers are expected to be by convention. Note that application_helper.rb is generated there by the rails command, and it already contains a module ApplicationHelper. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---