On 7 Feb 2008, at 17:45, M. B. wrote:
>
> I need some info for an admin who is unwilling to support Ruby on
> Rails
> because he says it "uses a container that has to be bounced which can
> cause problems with the server."
>
Has to be bounced ? we never restart our mongrels except for upgrades
> The admin also says he has been reading and claims Rails is causing
> problems for many companies.
>
Rails and shared hosting don''t get along that well, but other than
that I wouldn''t worry too much
> I need to convince this admin that Rails is worth supporting.
>
> I also need some info to convince this admin Rails is not more of a
> security risk than say hosting PHP applications.
You can write an insecure application in any language/framework.
Comparing rails to php is a bit odd, one being a language and the
other a framework. It is true though that rails tries hard to
encourage secure behaviour by default (eg if ou use the default AR
stuff you should be safe from sql injection)
Fred
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---