Rails - Jan 2008 - respond_to not working with RJS in rails?

I just created a new rails app to test this out, using edge rails. I
have one controller with one action. The action has both .rhtml and .rjs
views. I put this in the action:

respond_to do |format|
  format.html
  format.js
end

When I send an AJAX request from the html view to that action the
response is the rhtml template, not the rjs template. When I change it
to the following it works:

respond_to do |format|
  format.html
  format.js { render :template => "index.rjs" }
end

That works fine.

It was working fine a few months ago, now all of a sudden it doesn''t.
Do
I need to define a response for rjs?

I have no plugins, nothing, this is a completely clean and fresh rails
app.

Thanks for your help.
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Ben Johnson wrote:
> When I send an AJAX request from the html view to that action the
> response is the rhtml template, not the rjs template. When I change it
> to the following it works:
> 
> respond_to do |format|
>   format.html
>   format.js { render :template => "index.rjs" }
> end
First of all, your post help me solve a similar problem, so thank you!

Then I can hopefully help you, because I know exactly when this problem 
suddenly occured for me:

I use the above in a installation of the Beast forum. And it has worked 
fine while running Rails v. 1.2.6

When I upgraded to Rails 2.0.2 it simply stopped working - until I 
applied your solution minutes ago.

So: What version of Rails are you running?

- Carsten
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Seeing as you''re on Rails 2.0+, try naming your files:

index.html.erb
index.js.rjs

On Jan 18, 4:51 pm, Ben Johnson
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> I just created a new rails app to test this out, using edge rails. I
> have one controller with one action. The action has both .rhtml and .rjs
> views. I put this in the action:
>
> respond_to do |format|
>   format.html
>   format.js
> end
>
> When I send an AJAX request from the html view to that action the
> response is the rhtml template, not the rjs template. When I change it
> to the following it works:
>
> respond_to do |format|
>   format.html
>   format.js { render :template => "index.rjs" }
> end
>
> That works fine.
>
> It was working fine a few months ago, now all of a sudden it
doesn''t. Do
> I need to define a response for rjs?
>
> I have no plugins, nothing, this is a completely clean and fresh rails
> app.
>
> Thanks for your help.
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

stephen.celis-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
wrote:
> Seeing as you''re on Rails 2.0+, try naming your files:
> 
> index.html.erb
> index.js.rjs
> 
> On Jan 18, 4:51�pm, Ben Johnson
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
That fixed the problem.

Did they really change the naming format for views? So this is the 
"right" way to name your views now? Is there any article about this or
something. Thats kind of a big change to not announce, but maybe I 
missed the announcement.
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Yes, I believe this change was widely advertised. It''s now
"action.format.language"

Ex.:

index.html.erb # use Erb
index.html.haml # use Haml
index.html.mab # use Markaby
index.iphone.erb # serve iPhone content if MimeType is aliased and
user agent is detected

On Jan 19, 11:12 am, Ben Johnson
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> stephen.ce...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:
> > Seeing as you''re on Rails 2.0+, try naming your files:
>
> > index.html.erb
> > index.js.rjs
>
> > On Jan 18, 4:51�pm, Ben Johnson
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7m5VldFQK4jKA@public.gmane.orgt>
>
> That fixed the problem.
>
> Did they really change the naming format for views? So this is the
> "right" way to name your views now? Is there any article about
this or
> something. Thats kind of a big change to not announce, but maybe I
> missed the announcement.
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

stephen.celis-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
wrote:
> Yes, I believe this change was widely advertised. It''s now
> "action.format.language"
> 
> Ex.:
> 
> index.html.erb # use Erb
> index.html.haml # use Haml
> index.html.mab # use Markaby
> index.iphone.erb # serve iPhone content if MimeType is aliased and
> user agent is detected
> 
> On Jan 19, 11:12 am, Ben Johnson
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
Is rhtml gone, I was under the impression that was erb.
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

stephen.celis-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
wrote:
> Yes, I believe this change was widely advertised. It''s now
> "action.format.language"
> 
> Ex.:
> 
> index.html.erb # use Erb
> index.html.haml # use Haml
> index.html.mab # use Markaby
> index.iphone.erb # serve iPhone content if MimeType is aliased and
> user agent is detected
Although it was also widely advertised, that the old naming convention 
still would be in use.... It seems that it isn''t.

- Carsten
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

It works, but it isn''t as "smart". I.e., when you omit the
format from
the filename, respond_to doesn''t work without further specification.

On Jan 19, 2:58 pm, Carsten Gehling
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> stephen.ce...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:
> > Yes, I believe this change was widely advertised. It''s now
> > "action.format.language"
>
> > Ex.:
>
> > index.html.erb # use Erb
> > index.html.haml # use Haml
> > index.html.mab # use Markaby
> > index.iphone.erb # serve iPhone content if MimeType is aliased and
> > user agent is detected
>
> Although it was also widely advertised, that the old naming convention
> still would be in use.... It seems that it isn''t.
>
> - Carsten
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

stephen.celis-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
wrote:
> It works, but it isn''t as "smart". I.e., when you omit
the format from
> the filename, respond_to doesn''t work without further
specification.
> 
> On Jan 19, 2:58�pm, Carsten Gehling
<rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net>
So do you use rhtml or erb?
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

You should move to the new naming standard. Files suffixed .rhtml are
backwards-compatible, but not preferable. Rhtml IS erb, the naming
convention just allows you to easily do more...

styles.css.erb

On Jan 19, 4:03 pm, Ben Johnson
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> stephen.ce...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:
> > It works, but it isn''t as "smart". I.e., when you
omit the format from
> > the filename, respond_to doesn''t work without further
specification.
>
> > On Jan 19, 2:58�pm, Carsten Gehling
<rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net>
>
> So do you use rhtml or erb?
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---