Rails - Dec 2007 - how to append some action into already available controller?

how to append some action into already available controller with
corresponding views (*.rhtml) .for example

ruby/script generate controller admin action1 action2....

here admin is already available controller with some action
now ,what i want is the new actions(action1 action2....) should be
append
in admin_controller.rb and corresponding *.rhtml files
(action1.rhtml,action2.rhtml...) should be created in app/views/admin/*.


any idea ?
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

On Dec 1, 9:10 am, Pokkai Dokkai
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> how to append some action into already available controller with
> corresponding views (*.rhtml) .for example
>
What''s wrong with just creating those files/methods by hand ?

Fred
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Frederick Cheung wrote:
> On Dec 1, 9:10 am, Pokkai Dokkai
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
>> how to append some action into already available controller with
>> corresponding views (*.rhtml) .for example
>>
> 
> What''s wrong with just creating those files/methods by hand ?
> 
> Fred
i thing the main advanstage in Rails framework compare than others is 
very speed and easy implementation.

actually in some situation i want to create more than one public 
definition(method) in an existing controller .

in my projects there are lots of controllers (more than 300)

for example if i want to create 5 methods with corresponding views in a 
controller than ,if i do like this (ofcourse below is wrong) than my 
speed is 5 to 10 times fater than manual creating....
>ruby script/generate controller [-append] contro met1 met2 met3 met4 met5 

and one thing i ask ,why the rails developers should not add this append 
capability in controller generator ?
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

On 2 Dec 2007, at 05:34, Pokkai Dokkai wrote:
>
> Frederick Cheung wrote:
>> On Dec 1, 9:10 am, Pokkai Dokkai
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
>> wrote:
>>> how to append some action into already available controller with
>>> corresponding views (*.rhtml) .for example
>>>
>>
>> What''s wrong with just creating those files/methods by hand ?
>>
>> Fred
>
> i thing the main advanstage in Rails framework compare than others is
> very speed and easy implementation.
>
> actually in some situation i want to create more than one public
> definition(method) in an existing controller .
>
> in my projects there are lots of controllers (more than 300)
>
> for example if i want to create 5 methods with corresponding views  
> in a
> controller than ,if i do like this (ofcourse below is wrong) than my
> speed is 5 to 10 times fater than manual creating....
>
>> ruby script/generate controller [-append] contro met1 met2 met3  
>> met4 met5
>
While script/generate controller is a useful starting point  
(especially when you''re not quite sure what the naming conventions  
are, what files go where etc...) in my experience unless the methods  
and views were completely empty the bulk of the effort is in writing  
them and the time spent actually creating the files is rather  
negligible.
>
> and one thing i ask ,why the rails developers should not add this  
> append
> capability in controller generator ?
The generators in general tend to create new files rather than edit  
them. Off the top of my head I''d say that''s because
it''s a lot easier
to add things then it is to edit existing things. That said if you can  
find a way to make this all work nicely then you can always submit a  
patch.

Fred

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---