A friend of mine is looking to convince some executives to sign off on ruby. He''s looking for a good white paper executive summary of Rails. Not surprisingly, a simple google search doesn''t turn up much in this regard, developers seem to prefer to demonstrate Rails rather than summarize it. Regardless of the prevailing opinion on white papers, if you have something along these lines, it''d be a big help. Much thanks, - Matt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
It might be useful to let your peeps know a little about what rails is not - something that frankly I got hung up on over the past year: Ruby on Rails is NOT (and does not include) an object-oriented database (OODB) that munges up your relational models - in fact, it completely leverages your old-school, well-designed relational data models. Sure, it may reward one for a few relational best practices (e.g. table name => plural form; primary key => "id"; foreign key => [foreign_table_name]_id, etc.), but it does not obfuscate your data in layer-upon-layer of object-oriented dereferencing and wrappers. Not a white paper, but is that concise enough? m On 8/13/07, rails_in_dc <designmc-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > > A friend of mine is looking to convince some executives to sign off on > ruby. He''s looking for a good white paper executive summary of Rails. > Not surprisingly, a simple google search doesn''t turn up much in this > regard, developers seem to prefer to demonstrate Rails rather than > summarize it. > > Regardless of the prevailing opinion on white papers, if you have > something along these lines, it''d be a big help. > > Much thanks, > > - Matt > > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Not sure if it''s what your after but *Michel Barbosa **wrote a thesis on rails a while back http://thesis.cicaboo.com/ HTH Daniel * On 8/14/07, Marc Byrd <dr.marc.byrd-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > It might be useful to let your peeps know a little about what rails is not > - something that frankly I got hung up on over the past year: > > Ruby on Rails is NOT (and does not include) an object-oriented database > (OODB) that munges up your relational models - in fact, it completely > leverages your old-school, well-designed relational data models. Sure, it > may reward one for a few relational best practices ( e.g. table name => > plural form; primary key => "id"; foreign key => [foreign_table_name]_id, > etc.), but it does not obfuscate your data in layer-upon-layer of > object-oriented dereferencing and wrappers. > > Not a white paper, but is that concise enough? > > > m > > > > > On 8/13/07, rails_in_dc <designmc-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org > wrote: > > > > > > A friend of mine is looking to convince some executives to sign off on > > ruby. He''s looking for a good white paper executive summary of Rails. > > Not surprisingly, a simple google search doesn''t turn up much in this > > regard, developers seem to prefer to demonstrate Rails rather than > > summarize it. > > > > Regardless of the prevailing opinion on white papers, if you have > > something along these lines, it''d be a big help. > > > > Much thanks, > > > > - Matt > > > > > > > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
The following article from O''Reilly convinced me to switch from Java EE to Ruby on Rails. The fact that it''s written by a few Java gurus is pretty convincing : http://www.onjava.com/lpt/a/6334 Chris. On Aug 14, 3:33 am, rails_in_dc <desig...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> A friend of mine is looking to convince some executives to sign off on > ruby. He''s looking for a good white paper executive summary of Rails. > Not surprisingly, a simple google search doesn''t turn up much in this > regard, developers seem to prefer to demonstrate Rails rather than > summarize it. > > Regardless of the prevailing opinion on white papers, if you have > something along these lines, it''d be a big help. > > Much thanks, > > - Matt--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---