On 8/1/07, Phlip <phlip2005-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:>
>
> Railsters:
>
> The wave of the future, for view file names, is *.html.erb , with the
> target type on the left and the templating system on the right.
>
> Right?
>
> Or is *.erb.html also optional?
>
> We are looking at a template system that seems to register both
> extensions. Should it do that? Is that optional?
>
> One of them doesn''t seem to work!
>
> --
> Phlip
The general form of this should be
name.format.template_engine
format is the .html, xml, js, rss etc
template_engine is erb, haml, builder etc
HTH
Daniel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---