Hi I have to do a Video streaming website and I would like to know what would be BETTER to use ROR or ASP.NET? Which would give better performance on same hardware? Regards Sandeep -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Today the Geego cms is officially released as open source to the public. Geego puts no restrictions on data structure or final output and has built in image manipulation and multi-language support. All information can be found at. http://www.geegocms.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Ant Peacocke wrote:> Today the Geego cms is officially released as open source to the public. > > Geego puts no restrictions on data structure or final output and has > built in image manipulation and multi-language support. > > All information can be found at. > > http://www.geegocms.com > >...and all my thoughts about picking between Radiant and Mephisto just got blurred further.... Thanks for the effort - I have to add this to my to-evaluate list now! Cheers Mohit. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Why is a ftp server a requirement for a CMS package? Ant Peacocke wrote:> Today the Geego cms is officially released as open source to the public. > > Geego puts no restrictions on data structure or final output and has > built in image manipulation and multi-language support. > > All information can be found at. > > http://www.geegocms.com > > > > > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Sandeep Chandra wrote:> Hi > > I have to do a Video streaming website and I would like to know what > would be BETTER to use ROR or ASP.NET? > > Which would give better performance on same hardware?I''m working on the same problem actually. We''re using a PHP CMS to manage website content and user accounts and an ASP.NET tool for video cataloging and streaming. The tool is written in VB.NET or C# as far as I can tell. Do you suppose we are using the same video tool? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Ant Peacocke wrote:> Today the Geego cms is officially released as open source to the public. > > Geego puts no restrictions on data structure or final output and has > built in image manipulation and multi-language support. > > All information can be found at. > > http://www.geegocms.comSee related thread below: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/108353#247356 It would be great if we could consolidate efforts and pull the best solutions together into a killer CMS for RoR. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 5/22/07, Sandeep Chandra <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > Hi > > I have to do a Video streaming website and I would like to know what > would be BETTER to use ROR or ASP.NET? > > Which would give better performance on same hardware?ASP.net, easy. Compiled code is always faster than interpreted code. -- Rick Olson http://lighthouseapp.com http://weblog.techno-weenie.net http://mephistoblog.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Rick Olson wrote:> On 5/22/07, Sandeep Chandra <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I have to do a Video streaming website and I would like to know what >> would be BETTER to use ROR or ASP.NET? >> >> Which would give better performance on same hardware? >> > > ASP.net, easy. Compiled code is always faster than interpreted code. > >Yeah but who is actually going to do the streaming from either of those? That unto itself is slow. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
It makes the moving of manipulated images and other files that are uploaded by users very straight forward with no hitches in terms of users, groups and permissions. As most websites allow for updating of files via ftp it means the ftp user and webserver user will play together nicely. Ant On 22 May 2007, at 16:48, Sean T Allen wrote:> Why is a ftp server a requirement for a CMS package? > > Ant Peacocke wrote: >> Today the Geego cms is officially released as open source to the >> public. >> >> Geego puts no restrictions on data structure or final output and >> has built in image manipulation and multi-language support. >> >> All information can be found at. >> >> http://www.geegocms.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > >Ant Peacocke www.levelsystems.net T: + 33 (0) 8 70 46 63 37 M: + 33 (0) 6 09 81 06 00 skype: antpea --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
so you dont actually need an ftp server for Geego? you could run sftp instead? or is cms actually tied into using ftp specifically? Ant Peacocke wrote:> It makes the moving of manipulated images and other files that are > uploaded by users very straight forward with no hitches in terms of > users, groups and permissions. > > As most websites allow for updating of files via ftp it means the ftp > user and webserver user will play together nicely. > > Ant > > > On 22 May 2007, at 16:48, Sean T Allen wrote: > >> Why is a ftp server a requirement for a CMS package? >> >> Ant Peacocke wrote: >>> Today the Geego cms is officially released as open source to the public. >>> >>> Geego puts no restrictions on data structure or final output and has >>> built in image manipulation and multi-language support. >>> >>> All information can be found at. >>> >>> http://www.geegocms.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > Ant Peacocke > > www.levelsystems.net > T: + 33 (0) 8 70 46 63 37 > M: + 33 (0) 6 09 81 06 00 > skype: antpea > > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
@Rick: Interesting... thought you gave up .Net for Rails :) (kidding of course). @Sandeep I don''t know what would be faster but that''s because I don''t know what faster means. If you are just serving up videos from a database or file system, I would imagine that both ASP.Net and Rails would perform equivalently, as you''d probably use both languages to write static (cached) pages instead of always querying the db. I''d try both, and see what you get :) Now if you''re trying to encode video, that''s a bit different. On 5/22/07, Rick Olson <technoweenie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > > On 5/22/07, Sandeep Chandra <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > I have to do a Video streaming website and I would like to know what > > would be BETTER to use ROR or ASP.NET? > > > > Which would give better performance on same hardware? > > ASP.net, easy. Compiled code is always faster than interpreted code. > > -- > Rick Olson > http://lighthouseapp.com > http://weblog.techno-weenie.net > http://mephistoblog.com > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
You gonna be surprised but there is Ruby.NET :) http://plas.fit.qut.edu.au/Ruby.NET/ http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/Jul-02.html All the Best! Sergey. Brian Hogan wrote:> @Rick: > > Interesting... thought you gave up .Net for Rails :) > > (kidding of course). > > @Sandeep > > I don''t know what would be faster but that''s because I don''t know what > faster means. If you are just serving up videos from a database or > file system, I would imagine that both ASP.Net and Rails would perform > equivalently, as you''d probably use both languages to write static > (cached) pages instead of always querying the db. > > I''d try both, and see what you get :) > > Now if you''re trying to encode video, that''s a bit different. > > > On 5/22/07, *Rick Olson* <technoweenie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org > <mailto:technoweenie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>> wrote: > > > On 5/22/07, Sandeep Chandra <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org > <mailto:rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > I have to do a Video streaming website and I would like to know > what > > would be BETTER to use ROR or ASP.NET <http://ASP.NET>? > > > > Which would give better performance on same hardware? > > ASP.net, easy. Compiled code is always faster than interpreted code. > > -- > Rick Olson > http://lighthouseapp.com > http://weblog.techno-weenie.net > http://mephistoblog.com <http://mephistoblog.com> > > > > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Sergey Kuznetsov wrote:> You gonna be surprised but there is Ruby.NET :) > > http://plas.fit.qut.edu.au/Ruby.NET/ > http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/Jul-02.html >Don''t forget that Microsoft has announced their own Ruby .NET - called IronRuby - scheduled for public beta later this year. best wishes Huw Collingbourne http://www.sapphiresteel.com Ruby In Steel IDE For Visual Studio -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
There seems to be a group of Delphi/.NET/Ruby developers moving in the same circles. :o) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 5/22/07, Brian Hogan <bphogan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> @Rick: > > Interesting... thought you gave up .Net for Rails :)I did. Apparently developer productivity and fun won out :) Also, I believe you''ll be more limited by bandwidth for streaming movies anyway. -- Rick Olson http://lighthouseapp.com http://weblog.techno-weenie.net http://mephistoblog.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Right on! :) On 5/22/07, Rick Olson <technoweenie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > > On 5/22/07, Brian Hogan <bphogan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > @Rick: > > > > Interesting... thought you gave up .Net for Rails :) > > I did. Apparently developer productivity and fun won out :) > > Also, I believe you''ll be more limited by bandwidth for streaming > movies anyway. > > -- > Rick Olson > http://lighthouseapp.com > http://weblog.techno-weenie.net > http://mephistoblog.com > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Hi Sean Here is the code that logs on to the ftp. Note that the host in most cases is localhost (unless you want to store images and other assets on another server). So sftp is not needed from a security point of view. Of course if there was lots of demand and good reasons for using Net::SFTP it could be an option. require ''net/ftp'' ftp = Net::FTP.new(ADMIN_FTP_HOST) ftp.login(ADMIN_FTP_USER, ADMIN_FTP_PASS) As some more background into why I use ftp for moving files within in a website. If you upload content files from you dev machine to a live machine via ftp then everything is good to go in terms ownership and permissions when Geego needs to overwrite these files and directories with updated content. Ant On 22 May 2007, at 18:08, Sean T Allen wrote:> so you dont actually need an ftp server for Geego? > you could run sftp instead? > > or is cms actually tied into using ftp specifically? > > Ant Peacocke wrote: >> It makes the moving of manipulated images and other files that are >> uploaded by users very straight forward with no hitches in terms >> of users, groups and permissions. >> >> As most websites allow for updating of files via ftp it means the >> ftp user and webserver user will play together nicely. >> >> Ant >> >> >> On 22 May 2007, at 16:48, Sean T Allen wrote: >> >>> Why is a ftp server a requirement for a CMS package? >>> >>> Ant Peacocke wrote: >>>> Today the Geego cms is officially released as open source to the >>>> public. >>>> >>>> Geego puts no restrictions on data structure or final output and >>>> has built in image manipulation and multi-language support. >>>> >>>> All information can be found at. >>>> >>>> http://www.geegocms.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> Ant Peacocke >> >> www.levelsystems.net >> T: + 33 (0) 8 70 46 63 37 >> M: + 33 (0) 6 09 81 06 00 >> skype: antpea >> >> >> >> > > > >Ant Peacocke www.levelsystems.net T: + 33 (0) 8 70 46 63 37 M: + 33 (0) 6 09 81 06 00 skype: antpea --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---