I am curious as to why or why not other MVC approaches in PHP or other languages might advance alongside of Rails ? Perhaps this is because Rails is as much a framework as a language or platform and the same thing could be done conceptually in other ways. I Also find it a curious phenomenon why very intelligent developers I have known and met will say derogatory things about Rails without knowing much about it. Has anyone had similiar experiences ? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> I am curious as to why or why not other MVC approaches in PHP or > other languages might advance alongside of Rails ? Perhaps this is > because Rails is as much a framework as a language or platform and the > same thing could be done conceptually in other ways. > >so ask about them in the cakePHP / symfony list> I Also find it a curious phenomenon why very intelligent developers I > have known and met will say derogatory things about Rails without > knowing much about it. Has anyone had similiar experiences ? > > >no, and dont consider the makers of rails as "unintelligent", and the ones you met...intelligence is often a very relative term ;) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Hey On 5/14/07, surf <surfunbear-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > > I am curious as to why or why not other MVC approaches in PHP or > other languages might advance alongside of Rails ? Perhaps this is > because Rails is as much a framework as a language or platform and the > same thing could be done conceptually in other ways.I played with Symfony, and for PHP it''s a very advanced thing. The reason it cannot be compared to Rails is the language Rails is based on. Ruby is dynamic, OO to the core, concise, beautiful, fun ti use. Rails is a natural child of Ruby and its principles.> > I Also find it a curious phenomenon why very intelligent developers I > have known and met will say derogatory things about Rails without > knowing much about it. Has anyone had similar experiences ?Of course. Imagine you''ve spent 3 years of your life becoming a J2EE professional studying all these application servers, servlet containers, EJB, all those endless APIs. And now you see these Rails guys who can do the same without sacrificing the beautiful architecture, and who spent so much less time studying the framework :) Cheers, Yuri --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On May 14, 3:47 am, surf <surfunb...-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I am curious as to why or why not other MVC approaches in PHP or > other languages might advance alongside of Rails ? Perhaps this is > because Rails is as much a framework as a language or platform and the > same thing could be done conceptually in other ways.It''s all about the Ruby. Rails beauty is a direct result of embracing Ruby''s dynamic nature. A select few other languages could create reasonable Rails clones (Python, Smalltalk, Lisp), but I think that would be a mistake. A good framework should be optimized for the language it is created in. Python has Django, Smalltalk has Seaside. These are great frameworks because they have a strong vision and understanding of the core language behind them. They don''t try to copy something else. I think PHP frameworks will have a hard time keeping up because the language itself is so primitive when it comes to OOP. A language like Java is better suited to creating a great framework, but there you run into a culture clash. Java is very protective of the programmer, which feels needlessly restrictive to a rubyist. The Java programmer prefers to receive as many errors as possible at compile-time, and is content to let an IDE manage the boilerplate. The rubyist prefers more freedom and less typing, and is willing to debug more cryptic errors as an expense. I think it''s pretty clear that neither approach is superior, but people tend to have a preference. I, for one, have no interest in the explicit precision of the Java way, though I can see its benefit in certain applications.> I Also find it a curious phenomenon why very intelligent developers I > have known and met will say derogatory things about Rails without > knowing much about it. Has anyone had similiar experiences ?Most likely they are reacting to the hype engine of the Rails community. But just as hype is a bad reason to pick a technology, it''s just as bad a reason to shun it. Most Rails critiques from Java guys feel like they made a cursory examination of the technology just to confirm their prejudices. Rails has its warts, to be sure, but its an incredible code base. A lot of critics seized on the Twitter scalability issues as confirmation that Rails doesn''t scale. But a) they''re already doing 17,000 requests per second and b) they haven''t hit a brick wall, they just need to scale to multiple databases. That''s a significant challenge, but the fact that it doesn''t have a readymade solution in Rails is more of an indication of the rarity of an app that does 17,000 requests/second than any fundamental limitation in Rails. I think a lot of it stems from what Yuri says. If you are invested in J2EE and Rails comes around doing a lot of the same stuff at a fraction of the development time, that is a real threat. It''s only natural to be defensive. Certainly there are many many things that J2EE does that Rails does not that can be clung to as a sort of self- validation, but it''s not a sign of a good programmer to search for a litmus test they can use to dismiss new technologies. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> > It''s all about the Ruby. Rails beauty is a direct result of embracing > Ruby''s dynamic nature. A select few other languages could create > reasonable Rails clones (Python, Smalltalk, Lisp), but I think that > would be a mistake. A good framework should be optimized for the > language it is created in. Python has Django, Smalltalk has Seaside. > These are great frameworks because they have a strong vision and > understanding of the core language behind them. They don''t try to > copy something else. > > I think PHP frameworks will have a hard time keeping up because the > language itself is so primitive when it comes to OOP. A language like > Java is better suited to creating a great framework, but there you run > into a culture clash. Java is very protective of the programmer, > which feels needlessly restrictive to a rubyist. The Java programmer > prefers to receive as many errors as possible at compile-time, and is > content to let an IDE manage the boilerplate. The rubyist prefers > more freedom and less typing, and is willing to debug more cryptic > errors as an expense. I think it''s pretty clear that neither approach > is superior, but people tend to have a preference. I, for one, have > no interest in the explicit precision of the Java way, though I can > see its benefit in certain applications. >PHP has some object oriented features, which could be improved upon in another release of PHP; however, I seriously doubt there is any real momentum for that to happen is my impression. I told one guy I worked with that PHP is old technology. He said he disagreed with me and pointed out how many PHP books there are. Another young developer at work said that Rails along with iterative development is a ''cult'' as he refered to it. Someone else sort of told me with the exception of this one PHP project we have, I work at a Java shop and perhaps I shoud stop talking about Rails. None of these people are dumb at all, they in fact seem like very good developers in many ways. I have also been enthuisastic enough about PHP that I went out and bought 3 PHP reference books because of the PHP project we have been doing. I''m just surprised however because I never react that way against any technology I am not familiar with. Come to think of it, I picked up on C++ and Java very early on and even though I wasn''t doing any of that stuff at work when they came out, I went out and bought some books. The only thing I made a bad call on was that I favored Pascal over C back in the late 1980''s. I used to work in VAX Pascal on digital Vax machines, Apollo Pascal, and Metaware Pascal on Sun. I liked Pascal''s type checking at the time. However, I allways though C++ was burdened too much with backward compatability with C and that Pascal would have been a smoother transition into Java. I liked Java in that it was more like Pascal to me. Anyway, here is a curious one here, this guy says PHP is foing way better than Rails, but look down a few graphs and he shows that most new open source projects are Rails. That seems to blow a hole in his entire premise: http://www.ohloh.net/articles/php_eats_rails --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
It''s not even that PHP is old, but that it is not designed for software engineering. It''s designed first and foremost to hack together small stuff quickly. There are efforts to improve PHP, but it''s kind of silly to wait for that when 20, 30 and 40 year old languages are already much more powerful. FWIW I love PHP and still use it for a lot of things, but not to develop applications. I don''t think Rails will ever surpass PHP because Rails targets a different user base than PHP. Even if deployment became tremendously easy, Rails still requires a memory footprint that could only decline if Rails could somehow be made thread-safe (don''t hold your breath). However as a Rails developer I have no desire to see Rails become dominant. That would mean more dead-weight in the community and a general decrease in the quality of open-source Ruby as lowest common denominator jumped on board. The important thing is that Rails (and Ruby) have the critical mass to sustain a viable platform going into the future. I couldn''t care less if someone thinks I''m a member of some sort of cult. It''s a waste of time to debate people that are so entrenched and defensive as to make such ignorant claims. On May 14, 7:09 pm, surf <surfunb...-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> PHP has some object oriented features, which could be improved upon in > another release of PHP; however, I seriously doubt there is any real > momentum for that to happen is my impression. I told one guy I worked > with that PHP is old technology. He said he disagreed with me and > pointed out how many PHP books there are. Another young developer at > work said that Rails along with iterative development is a ''cult'' as > he refered to it. Someone else sort of told me with the exception of > this one PHP project we have, I work at a Java shop and perhaps I > shoud stop talking about Rails. None of these people are dumb at all, > they in fact seem like very good developers in many ways. I have also > been enthuisastic enough about PHP that I went out and bought 3 PHP > reference books because of the PHP project we have been doing. I''m > just surprised however because I never react that way against any > technology I am not familiar with. Come to think of it, I picked up on > C++ and Java very early on and even though I wasn''t doing any of that > stuff at work when they came out, I went out and bought some books. > The only thing I made a bad call on was that I favored Pascal over C > back in the late 1980''s. > I used to work in VAX Pascal on digital Vax machines, Apollo Pascal, > and Metaware Pascal on Sun. I liked Pascal''s type checking at the > time. However, I allways though C++ was burdened too much with > backward compatability with C and that Pascal would have been a > smoother transition into Java. I liked Java in that it was more like > Pascal to me. > > Anyway, here is a curious one here, this guy says PHP is foing way > better than Rails, but look down a few > graphs and he shows that most new open source projects are Rails. That > seems to blow a hole in his entire premise: > > http://www.ohloh.net/articles/php_eats_rails--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Another interesting oversight in the link above at Ohloh (http:// www.ohloh.net/articles/php_eats_rails) is in the first graph which is looking at the number of lines of code added to projects. We all know that rails requires far less lines of code to produce the same functionality which explains the later graph showing more new rails projects. To me this says Rails developers are getting the job done (with less lines of code) and starting new projects while there PHP collegues are still adding code to their exising projects. However, personally I don''t believe it matters which is best (which is objective anyway depending on the project). I am passionate about software development full stop, in all languages. But Rails has been an awakening to new (and some old) ideas which work really well together and I am getting a lot from Rails as a developer that has improved my developing in other languages too. I have used many languages over the years, including Pascal, Perl, Java, PHP (which reminds me that when I was first developing in it, it was called Personal Home Page and it''s mission was to be a simple language anyone can pick up which I believe still holds true as I know several non- programmers who get by, writing their own personal sites using PHP, which I think is brilliant and it is powerful enough to handle many complex sites) more recently I have used .Net. Everything I have learnt doing Rails has improved me as a developer. I have used an MVC approach in .Net for example using SubSonic (inspired by the ActiveRecord elements of rails) which although is not as nice to use or clean as rails has helped me in .my Net projects. Rails is brilliant and I truely believe that learning rails has made me a much better developer. Finally, one of the thinks I like most about Rails is the community which is supportive and friendly. I worry that this would be lost if the masses came over to it from other languages. On May 15, 2:09 am, surf <surfunb...-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > It''s all about the Ruby. Rails beauty is a direct result of embracing > > Ruby''s dynamic nature. A select few other languages could create > > reasonable Rails clones (Python, Smalltalk, Lisp), but I think that > > would be a mistake. A good framework should be optimized for the > > language it is created in. Python has Django, Smalltalk has Seaside. > > These are great frameworks because they have a strong vision and > > understanding of the core language behind them. They don''t try to > > copy something else. > > > I think PHP frameworks will have a hard time keeping up because the > > language itself is so primitive when it comes to OOP. A language like > > Java is better suited to creating a great framework, but there you run > > into a culture clash. Java is very protective of the programmer, > > which feels needlessly restrictive to a rubyist. The Java programmer > > prefers to receive as many errors as possible at compile-time, and is > > content to let an IDE manage the boilerplate. The rubyist prefers > > more freedom and less typing, and is willing to debug more cryptic > > errors as an expense. I think it''s pretty clear that neither approach > > is superior, but people tend to have a preference. I, for one, have > > no interest in the explicit precision of the Java way, though I can > > see its benefit in certain applications. > > PHP has some object oriented features, which could be improved upon in > another release of PHP; however, I seriously doubt there is any real > momentum for that to happen is my impression. I told one guy I worked > with that PHP is old technology. He said he disagreed with me and > pointed out how many PHP books there are. Another young developer at > work said that Rails along with iterative development is a ''cult'' as > he refered to it. Someone else sort of told me with the exception of > this one PHP project we have, I work at a Java shop and perhaps I > shoud stop talking about Rails. None of these people are dumb at all, > they in fact seem like very good developers in many ways. I have also > been enthuisastic enough about PHP that I went out and bought 3 PHP > reference books because of the PHP project we have been doing. I''m > just surprised however because I never react that way against any > technology I am not familiar with. Come to think of it, I picked up on > C++ and Java very early on and even though I wasn''t doing any of that > stuff at work when they came out, I went out and bought some books. > The only thing I made a bad call on was that I favored Pascal over C > back in the late 1980''s. > I used to work in VAX Pascal on digital Vax machines, Apollo Pascal, > and Metaware Pascal on Sun. I liked Pascal''s type checking at the > time. However, I allways though C++ was burdened too much with > backward compatability with C and that Pascal would have been a > smoother transition into Java. I liked Java in that it was more like > Pascal to me. > > Anyway, here is a curious one here, this guy says PHP is foing way > better than Rails, but look down a few > graphs and he shows that most new open source projects are Rails. That > seems to blow a hole in his entire premise: > > http://www.ohloh.net/articles/php_eats_rails--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> > However, personally I don''t believe it matters which is best (which is > objective anyway depending on the project). I am passionate about > software development full stop, in all languages.If I am working using a language like Rails which will get the job done better, then I get a lift out of that and it will make my life easier and will mean that stuff gets done more effectively and I won''t be as stressed out and frustrated. It often seems for me that it ends up sounding like I am selfish and just want to play around with technology that I like and I don''t care so much about the project and so on. There allways seems to be some disconnect with non technical management. I tried to advocate a Rails solution over installing 200,000 lines of open source PHP code and then get locked into that. It seemed it was portrayed that I was advocating a "custom" solution when the functionality was allready there, except the functionality that was allready there was very rigid and difficult to work with. Latter I sent an email saying I hadn''t really done my salesmanship very well and that in fact there are many examples of getting alot of functionality going using Rails in a short amount of time. I also find it difficult to leave certain jobs because I need alot of flexibility and have vacation requirements that alot of companies do not provide so I end up having to compromise a great deal. At least I am geting some PHP experience which even though I had applied to Rails jobs before, I was often asked if I had done PHP and I had not. I had bought a book on PHP and it sort of seemed like Perl with classes added and not much else and I just hadn''t gotten very excited about it. I was learning javascript and not getting too excited about that either as it was a whole language to learn that had a limited usage in a browser. I was reading Java certification guides and thinking to myself why do I want to memorize all this API and configuration stuff to get certified when all I want to do is write code and look in a manual when I need to ? It used to be I could say I was a C++ programmer and get a job, but then it seemed like Java really meant J2EE and the stuff out there was just so involved and wrapped up in API config stuff. It allmost sounds like sys admin work rather than programming. I was reading SOA books, SOAP books, AJAX books written from the perspective of Javascript and wondering where all this was leading, then I bought my first Rails book and it was like this is it, something to get excited about ... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
alexander-0M91wEDH++c@public.gmane.org
2007-May-16 10:06 UTC
Re: what of PHP frameworks like cakePHP and smyfony ?
dear sender, i´m out of the office until may 29th. your email will not be forwarded. for urgent stuff please contact joern-0M91wEDH++c@public.gmane.org kind regards, alexander --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
First of rails is not a language, rails is a framework. Ruby is the language, behind rails and is what makes rails so special. Active records, view and everything else use heavy amounts of meta programming to give you all the nice features you see, something that could not be replicated so well in many other languages. Also concerning many intelligent developers as you would call them, are more stuck in their ways and would not change to any other language not just rails, most developers who actually understand what their doing love rails because they can stop having to do the same repetitive crap over and over and the whole process becomes very agile. the rails framework is very well thought out with many references to PPOPE book and the actual framework comes from trying to feel the need in the commercial world. On May 16, 8:06 pm, alexan...-0M91wEDH++c@public.gmane.org wrote:> dear sender, > i´m out of the office until may 29th. > your email will not be forwarded. > for urgent stuff please contact j...-0M91wEDH++c@public.gmane.org > kind regards, > alexander--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---