Rails - May 2007 - Recent Routing changes in edge rails?

Does anyone have a link to where they changed the routing behavior in
edge rails with in the last 3 weeks? Or can give a brief overview of the
changes?

Seems for example the below went from:

messages: GET    /:user_id/messages/
{:action=>"index", :controller=>"messages"}

To this:

user_messages: GET    /:user_id/messages/
{:controller=>"messages", :action=>"index"}

This happened between revision 6518 and revision 6654 in edge rails.

Route is defined as:

  map.resources :users do |user|
    user.resources :messages, :path_prefix => '':user_id''
  end

Thanks
 - John

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

> user_messages: GET    /:user_id/messages/
> {:controller=>"messages", :action=>"index"}
>
> This happened between revision 6518 and revision 6654 in edge rails.
>
> Route is defined as:
>
>   map.resources :users do |user|
>     user.resources :messages, :path_prefix =>
'':user_id''
>   end
This is done to prevent namespace classes. If you wish to get the old
behavior, you can do :name_prefix => nil.

The preferred way to do what you''re doing is now:

  map.resources :users, :has_many => :messages


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

>> Route is defined as:
>>
>>   map.resources :users do |user|
>>     user.resources :messages, :path_prefix =>
'':user_id''
>>   end
> 
> This is done to prevent namespace classes. If you wish to get the old
> behavior, you can do :name_prefix => nil.
> 
> The preferred way to do what you''re doing is now:
> 
>   map.resources :users, :has_many => :messages
Ahh, thanks, I see it here now: 
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/6588

Can you still specify a :path_prefix with the new way (has_many)?

For example if I wanted the prefix to be :user_login?

I have not fixed all the routes yet to test this.

Thank you,
 - John

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

> >   map.resources :users, :has_many => :messages
>
> Ahh, thanks, I see it here now:http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/6588
>
> Can you still specify a :path_prefix with the new way (has_many)?
No. If you want to use options outside of the convention, you''ll still
need to work with a block. The block will remain in place for those
(presumably rare) instances.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

> The preferred way to do what you''re doing is now:
> 
>   map.resources :users, :has_many => :messages
I am digging on this syntax.  More terse and make sense in the context 
of Rails/ActiveRecord.

I did get tripped up a bit by the changing of the _url and _path 
methods.

http://tuples.us/2007/05/02/changes-to-nested-resource-routes/

Jordan

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---