Hi list, I''ve just run my testscript 100 times to see if mongrel really was that fast as the internet suggested. Both webrick as mongrel are run in production mode, with the same tests. Both are run as a single process and default logging. But in every test mongrel is a bit slower than WebRick, for example : Webrick: AdminController#index 101(count) 0.0457 (Avg) 0.5519 (Std) Mongrel: AdminController#index 101(count) 0.0536 (Avg) 0.6123 (Std) It''s not much difference, but I suspected Mongrel to be superior to Webrick. I''m running both tests on Ubuntu 7.04. Mongrel was installed by gem install mongrel. Have I done something wrong? Joram --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---