Rails - Dec 2006 - Using RedCloth 3.0.3. Rails when RedCloth 3.0.4. exists

Hi all,
I am trying to use RedCloth 3.0.3. on shared host but when I put 
direction to include this version in enviroment.rb:
require ''rubygems''
require_gem ''RedCloth'', ''= 3.0.3''

I receive error: /usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:149:in `activate'': 
can''t activate RedCloth (= 3.0.3), already activated RedCloth 3.0.4.
Exception).

When I put this commands in boot.rb instead, it works, but it say that 
boot.rb should not use for configuration... so the question is where 
requiring should occur and if there is better way to do this? 
(nistalling 3.0.4 is not an option)

thanks for answer in advance,
Bojan


-- 
Bojan Mihelac
Informatika Mihelac, Bojan Mihelac s.p.  |  www.informatikamihelac.com
-> tools, scripts, tricks from our code lab: http://source.mihelac.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Hi, you may need to freeze rails as well as non-rails gems locally
before upload to your shared host.  This simply recreates your local
configuration onto the remote host and I believe this is the
recommended way of doing things in this situation.

Good luck,

-Conrad



On 12/14/06, Bojan Mihelac <lists-3SxN1WY3PMJAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I am trying to use RedCloth 3.0.3. on shared host but when I put
> direction to include this version in enviroment.rb:
> require ''rubygems''
> require_gem ''RedCloth'', ''= 3.0.3''
>
> I receive error: /usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:149:in
`activate'':
> can''t activate RedCloth (= 3.0.3), already activated RedCloth
3.0.4.
> Exception).
>
> When I put this commands in boot.rb instead, it works, but it say that
> boot.rb should not use for configuration... so the question is where
> requiring should occur and if there is better way to do this?
> (nistalling 3.0.4 is not an option)
>
> thanks for answer in advance,
> Bojan
>
>
> --
> Bojan Mihelac
> Informatika Mihelac, Bojan Mihelac s.p.  |  www.informatikamihelac.com
> -> tools, scripts, tricks from our code lab: http://source.mihelac.org
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Thanks Conrad,
but what if I have both versions of RedCloth on local machine as well? 
there should be way to specify which RedCloth Rails should use, 
shouldn''t it?

Bojan

Conrad Taylor wrote:
> Hi, you may need to freeze rails as well as non-rails gems locally
> before upload to your shared host.  This simply recreates your local
> configuration onto the remote host and I believe this is the
> recommended way of doing things in this situation.
> 
> Good luck,
> 
> -Conrad
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/14/06, Bojan Mihelac
<lists-3SxN1WY3PMJAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I am trying to use RedCloth 3.0.3. on shared host but when I put
>> direction to include this version in enviroment.rb:
>> require ''rubygems''
>> require_gem ''RedCloth'', ''= 3.0.3''
>>
>> I receive error: /usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:149:in
`activate'':
>> can''t activate RedCloth (= 3.0.3), already activated RedCloth
3.0.4.
>> Exception).
>>
>> When I put this commands in boot.rb instead, it works, but it say that
>> boot.rb should not use for configuration... so the question is where
>> requiring should occur and if there is better way to do this?
>> (nistalling 3.0.4 is not an option)
>>
>> thanks for answer in advance,
>> Bojan
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bojan Mihelac
>> Informatika Mihelac, Bojan Mihelac s.p.  |  www.informatikamihelac.com
>> -> tools, scripts, tricks from our code lab:
http://source.mihelac.org
>>
> 
> > 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Bojan Mihelac
Informatika Mihelac, Bojan Mihelac s.p.  |  www.informatikamihelac.com
-> tools, scripts, tricks from our code lab: http://source.mihelac.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

I''ve run across this problem myself and found that [for my setup at
least]
requiring "redcloth" in config/environment.rb BEFORE the Rails
Initializer
block loads the correct, specified version. Rails loads RedCloth on its own
in the initialization block so unless you do it before then you''re
stuck
with the Rails version. Most of the time it''s not a problem so I
wouldn''t
call it a bug really. Just undocumented.

RSL

On 12/14/06, Bojan Mihelac <lists-3SxN1WY3PMJAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Conrad,
> but what if I have both versions of RedCloth on local machine as well?
> there should be way to specify which RedCloth Rails should use,
> shouldn''t it?
>
> Bojan
>
> Conrad Taylor wrote:
> > Hi, you may need to freeze rails as well as non-rails gems locally
> > before upload to your shared host.  This simply recreates your local
> > configuration onto the remote host and I believe this is the
> > recommended way of doing things in this situation.
> >
> > Good luck,
> >
> > -Conrad
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/14/06, Bojan Mihelac
<lists-3SxN1WY3PMJAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> I am trying to use RedCloth 3.0.3. on shared host but when I put
> >> direction to include this version in enviroment.rb:
> >> require ''rubygems''
> >> require_gem ''RedCloth'', ''=
3.0.3''
> >>
> >> I receive error: /usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:149:in
`activate'':
> >> can''t activate RedCloth (= 3.0.3), already activated
RedCloth 3.0.4.
> >> Exception).
> >>
> >> When I put this commands in boot.rb instead, it works, but it say
that
> >> boot.rb should not use for configuration... so the question is
where
> >> requiring should occur and if there is better way to do this?
> >> (nistalling 3.0.4 is not an option)
> >>
> >> thanks for answer in advance,
> >> Bojan
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bojan Mihelac
> >> Informatika Mihelac, Bojan Mihelac s.p.  | 
www.informatikamihelac.com
> >> -> tools, scripts, tricks from our code lab:
http://source.mihelac.org
> >>
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Bojan Mihelac
> Informatika Mihelac, Bojan Mihelac s.p.  |  www.informatikamihelac.com
> -> tools, scripts, tricks from our code lab: http://source.mihelac.org
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Russell Norris wrote:
> I''ve run across this problem myself and found that [for my setup
at
> least]
> requiring "redcloth" in config/environment.rb BEFORE the Rails 
> Initializer
> block loads the correct, specified version. Rails loads RedCloth on its 
> own
> in the initialization block so unless you do it before then you''re
stuck
> with the Rails version. Most of the time it''s not a problem so I 
> wouldn''t
> call it a bug really. Just undocumented.
> 
> RSL
Hello, I have the exact problem here - but requiring the gem before the 
initialization block doesn''t work here.
Even if I write
  require_gem ''RedCloth'', ''3.0.3''
as the first line of environment.rb (even before setting the 
RAILS_GEM_VERSION), I get this error:

script/server webrick
=> Booting WEBrick...
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:196:in `activate'':
can''t
activate RedCloth (= 3.0.3), already activated RedCloth-3.0.4] 
(Gem::Exception)
        from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:66:in 
`active_gem_with_options''
        from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:59:in
`require_gem''
        from ./script/../config/../config/environment.rb:1
        ....


why?

Johannes Held

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---