http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/5554 -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Roderick van Domburg
2006-Nov-20 19:46 UTC
Re: ActiveResource will not ship with Rails 1.2
Indeed, that grabbed my attention as well. It''s great that 1.2 will support the "publishing" REST interfaces right out of the box. At the same time, not having the functionality to consume them does make it feel a bit half-done and may defer the Coming of a New Web Service Age. Here''s to hoping a plugin for 1.2 will be stubbed out of Edge Rails! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 08:21:24PM +0100, Channer Teomond wrote:> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/5554It was never inteded to. Having it bundled in was an oversight. marcel -- Marcel Molina Jr. <marcel-WRrfy3IlpWYdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Roderick van Domburg wrote:> Indeed, that grabbed my attention as well. >Well on the positive side RJS wasn''t done either when Rails 1.0 was released but they shipped it soon after and it was fully baked by then. I''m sure we''ll see the rest of REST (no pun intended) ship soon after. I think they just want to get 1.2 out the door. Probably on the Dec. anniversary of launching 1.0. From the notes in SVN it looks like the release candidate is coming. I do wonder how many books going to press are going to get screwed up though refering to the 1.2 REST support in Rails? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Roderick van Domburg
2006-Nov-20 20:37 UTC
Re: ActiveResource will not ship with Rails 1.2
Marcel Molina Jr. wrote:> It was never inteded to. Having it bundled in was an oversight.Could you tell us more about the release scheduling of ActiveResource (or the Rails version it''ll be included in, for that matter)? - Roderick -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 09:37:00PM +0100, Roderick van Domburg wrote:> Marcel Molina Jr. wrote: > > It was never inteded to. Having it bundled in was an oversight. > > Could you tell us more about the release scheduling of ActiveResource > (or the Rails version it''ll be included in, for that matter)?All "included in Rails" would mean is that it is marked as a dependency in the gem specification so that when you do "sudo gem install rails" it would slurp down ActiveResource. If we never bundled ActiveResource with rails, all you''d ever have to do if you were planning on using it in a rails app is "sudo gem install activeresource". As for when ActiveResource will be released as a gem, regardless of whether rails will mark it as a dependency, there is currently no set timeline. We are currently using it already in production at 37signals and so are at least a couple other people in core (or at least, it appears they will be soon). marcel -- Marcel Molina Jr. <marcel-WRrfy3IlpWYdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---