That''s the convention that''s been adopted. It makes sense to
me. If
we''re now thinking of accessing resources then it makes sense. It
seems to follow the convention for naming database tables: the place
where you access your data/resources has a plural name.
On Sep 25, 2006, at 7:28 PM, Dark Ambient wrote:
>
> In REST , is it right that controller names are plural ?
>
> Stuart
>
> --
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_ambient
>
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---