George Wang
2006-Sep-01 05:14 UTC
Performance comparison: LiteSpeed + Ruby LSAPI vs Ruby FCGI
Hi, I spent some time on benchmarking Ruby LSAPI and Ruby FCGI interface, it might be helpful for people who want to bring the best performance out of Ruby/Rails, if you if you are interested, the result is available at http://blog.litespeedtech.com/ Best Regards, George Wang -- LiteSpeed Web Server http://www.litespeedtech.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
snacktime
2006-Sep-01 07:31 UTC
Re: Performance comparison: LiteSpeed + Ruby LSAPI vs Ruby FCGI
Btw, any chance on getting a binary compiled for Freebsd 6? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
serge-+Zb6sA+pqMZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org
2006-Sep-01 07:52 UTC
Re: Performance comparison: LiteSpeed + Ruby LSAPI vs Ruby FCGI
Hi George, Can you tell me if LSAPI natively supports something like this http://sean.treadway.info/demo/upload/ Thanks, Serge --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
George Wang
2006-Sep-01 15:21 UTC
Re: Performance comparison: LiteSpeed + Ruby LSAPI vs Ruby FCGI
snacktime,
We built freebsd 6 binary periodically, you can get it at
http://www.litespeedtech.com/packages/2.2/std/lsws-2.2-std-i386-freebsd6.tar.gz
or
http://www.litespeedtech.com/packages/2.2/ent/lsws-2.2-ent-i386-freebsd6.tar.gz
Best Regards,
George
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
George Wang
2006-Sep-01 15:54 UTC
Re: Performance comparison: LiteSpeed + Ruby LSAPI vs Ruby FCGI
Serge, No, upload progress bar does not work with LSWS+LSAPI, it is not related to LSAPI, but because LSWS waits for the whole request before forwarding it to backend scripting engine. We does that because the precious backend scripting engine don''t need to wait for the slow I/O. On the other hand, doing upload progress bar inside Rails framework is not a good idea to us, maybe OK for small sites, but for high traffic sites, scalability will become a serious issue. Best Regards, George serge-+Zb6sA+pqMZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org wrote:> Hi George, > > Can you tell me if LSAPI natively supports something like this > > http://sean.treadway.info/demo/upload/ > > Thanks, > Serge > > > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
snacktime
2006-Sep-01 17:28 UTC
Re: Performance comparison: LiteSpeed + Ruby LSAPI vs Ruby FCGI
On 9/1/06, George Wang <gwang-vugsFtsTCG9r6h6lumtxgQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > snacktime, > > We built freebsd 6 binary periodically, you can get it at > > http://www.litespeedtech.com/packages/2.2/std/lsws-2.2-std-i386-freebsd6.tar.gz > or > > http://www.litespeedtech.com/packages/2.2/ent/lsws-2.2-ent-i386-freebsd6.tar.gzThanks!! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---