hi all is there eany installation guide that explais how to set up RadRails and how to create a RoR project with eclipse? thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> is there eany installation guide that explais how to set up RadRails > and how to create a RoR project with eclipse?Isn''t this enough? http://www.radrails.org/page/documentation (6 steps) There is a screencast on how to import an existing project that could easily be adapted to creating a new project...
Michael, This is not enough. The http://www.radrails.org pages are really poor in documentation. It looks like they do not want to promote their product!!! Here is a detailed installation guide that explains how to run a RadRails project http://wiki.awebfactory.com.ar/awebfactory/published/RadRailsTutorials Michael Schreifels wrote:>> is there eany installation guide that explais how to set up RadRails >> and how to create a RoR project with eclipse? > > Isn''t this enough? http://www.radrails.org/page/documentation (6 steps) > > There is a screencast on how to import an existing project that could > easily be adapted to creating a new project...-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:52 AM, Jose Pepe wrote:> Michael, > > This is not enough. > > The http://www.radrails.org pages are really poor in documentation. It > looks like they do not want to promote their product!!! > > Here is a detailed installation guide that explains how to run a > RadRails project > http://wiki.awebfactory.com.ar/awebfactory/published/RadRailsTutorialsI think what''s happening is that RadRails isn''t trying to document how eclipse or ruby on rails work. Which is understandable. If you''re dissatisfied with documentation, help out! Making a link to that tutorial on their wiki, or emailing it to doc@radrails.org would be a great start. -Mat
Just out of curiousity, what great product have you spent untold hours of your precious time on, and donated to the Rails community? Perhaps, we could all use that one as a standard for ''proper'' documentation. -Larry On 7/31/06, Jose Pepe <jsnit@jsnit.com> wrote:> > Michael, > > This is not enough. > > The http://www.radrails.org pages are really poor in documentation. It > looks like they do not want to promote their product!!! > > Here is a detailed installation guide that explains how to run a > RadRails project > http://wiki.awebfactory.com.ar/awebfactory/published/RadRailsTutorials > > > > Michael Schreifels wrote: > >> is there eany installation guide that explais how to set up RadRails > >> and how to create a RoR project with eclipse? > > > > Isn''t this enough? http://www.radrails.org/page/documentation (6 steps) > > > > There is a screencast on how to import an existing project that could > > easily be adapted to creating a new project... > > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-- Best Regards, -Larry "Work, work, work...there is no satisfactory alternative." --- E.Taft Benson -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060731/3b6c7478/attachment.html
i found this to be very frustrating as well. as a newbie on rails, it''s very hard to find enough information on the best ways to get your environment configured. i ended up using InstantRails - which is an already configured Rails environment that you unzip to a directory on your machine and then you''re up and running. Jose Pepe wrote:> hi all > > is there eany installation guide that explais how to set up RadRails > and how to create a RoR project with eclipse? > > thanks-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
On Jul 31, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Kaori D''Alessio wrote:> i found this to be very frustrating as well. as a newbie on rails, > it''s > very hard to find enough information on the best ways to get your > environment configured. i ended up using InstantRails - which is an > already configured Rails environment that you unzip to a directory on > your machine and then you''re up and running.Yeah, I''ll second that. I think a big part of the issue is over- confidence in the wiki. Which DHH has cited as a regret about the course of the project. It seems that the public at large just doesn''t have a lot of talent for document writing. You can look at the silver lining though and realize that limited documentation means you''re close to the cutting edge of development :) -Mat
Mat Schaffer wrote:> On Jul 31, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Kaori D''Alessio wrote: >> i found this to be very frustrating as well. as a newbie on rails, >> it''s >> very hard to find enough information on the best ways to get your >> environment configured. i ended up using InstantRails - which is an >> already configured Rails environment that you unzip to a directory on >> your machine and then you''re up and running. > > Yeah, I''ll second that. I think a big part of the issue is over- > confidence in the wiki. Which DHH has cited as a regret about the > course of the project. > > It seems that the public at large just doesn''t have a lot of talent > for document writing. > > You can look at the silver lining though and realize that limited > documentation means you''re close to the cutting edge of development :) > -Matthat''s so funny you say that because i''ve run into a lot of organizations who want to jump aboard the rails movement, BUT they cite the lack of support documentation for dev. tools as a reason not to move to rails, and thus stay in asp.net or j2ee land. ruby on rails documentation is ok, so i''ve just decided to command line everything and write html in notepad++ and let that be it. i can be very productive this way until the tools/documentation are more mature. after spending a couple of days troubleshooting eclipse w/ rails, i switched to instantrails as well, and i''ve been able to move ahead. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Something that I was expecting from RADRails is the possibility of using the eclipse visual editor to build rhtml pages for ruby. Without a drag and drop option to create rhtml forms, I do not see how the RADRails pulgin uses the power of eclipse. I will try to create a documentation based on mac os x. thanks Mark Blair wrote:> Mat Schaffer wrote: >> On Jul 31, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Kaori D''Alessio wrote: >>> i found this to be very frustrating as well. as a newbie on rails, >>> it''s >>> very hard to find enough information on the best ways to get your >>> environment configured. i ended up using InstantRails - which is an >>> already configured Rails environment that you unzip to a directory on >>> your machine and then you''re up and running. >> >> Yeah, I''ll second that. I think a big part of the issue is over- >> confidence in the wiki. Which DHH has cited as a regret about the >> course of the project. >> >> It seems that the public at large just doesn''t have a lot of talent >> for document writing. >> >> You can look at the silver lining though and realize that limited >> documentation means you''re close to the cutting edge of development :) >> -Mat > > that''s so funny you say that because i''ve run into a lot of > organizations who want to jump aboard the rails movement, BUT they cite > the lack of support documentation for dev. tools as a reason not to move > to rails, and thus stay in asp.net or j2ee land. > > ruby on rails documentation is ok, so i''ve just decided to command line > everything and write html in notepad++ and let that be it. i can be > very productive this way until the tools/documentation are more mature. > > after spending a couple of days troubleshooting eclipse w/ rails, i > switched to instantrails as well, and i''ve been able to move ahead.-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Rails is still somewhat in early-stage hacker mode. Determined early adopters recognize the business value of learning Rails right now. Piece together the info from all the various blogs and wikis. It is all out there, just not in one tight little package. Takes a little detective work, but thats part of the fun. If you need it all handed to you on a silver platter, that costs money, so just sit on the sidelines for another year or two and I promise there will be another 20 books out there awaiting your purchase. But by then everyone and their mother will be able to write Rails apps. I am anxiously awaiting the Rails Deployment book though, (hint hint Ezra!) And now I need to get back to work and stop procrastinating on mailing lists. :) -- Scott Becker Electro Interactive, Inc. Office: 813-333-5508 http://www.ElectroInteractive.com On 7/31/06, Jose Pepe <jsnit@jsnit.com> wrote:> Something that I was expecting from RADRails is the possibility of using > the eclipse visual editor to build rhtml pages for ruby. Without a drag > and drop option to create rhtml forms, I do not see how the RADRails > pulgin uses the power of eclipse. > > I will try to create a documentation based on mac os x. > > thanks > > > > > Mark Blair wrote: > > Mat Schaffer wrote: > >> On Jul 31, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Kaori D''Alessio wrote: > >>> i found this to be very frustrating as well. as a newbie on rails, > >>> it''s > >>> very hard to find enough information on the best ways to get your > >>> environment configured. i ended up using InstantRails - which is an > >>> already configured Rails environment that you unzip to a directory on > >>> your machine and then you''re up and running. > >> > >> Yeah, I''ll second that. I think a big part of the issue is over- > >> confidence in the wiki. Which DHH has cited as a regret about the > >> course of the project. > >> > >> It seems that the public at large just doesn''t have a lot of talent > >> for document writing. > >> > >> You can look at the silver lining though and realize that limited > >> documentation means you''re close to the cutting edge of development :) > >> -Mat > > > > that''s so funny you say that because i''ve run into a lot of > > organizations who want to jump aboard the rails movement, BUT they cite > > the lack of support documentation for dev. tools as a reason not to move > > to rails, and thus stay in asp.net or j2ee land. > > > > ruby on rails documentation is ok, so i''ve just decided to command line > > everything and write html in notepad++ and let that be it. i can be > > very productive this way until the tools/documentation are more mature. > > > > after spending a couple of days troubleshooting eclipse w/ rails, i > > switched to instantrails as well, and i''ve been able to move ahead. > > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >
On Jul 31, 2006, at 8:40 PM, Scott Becker wrote:> Rails is still somewhat in early-stage hacker mode. Determined early > adopters recognize the business value of learning Rails right now. > Piece together the info from all the various blogs and wikis. It is > all out there, just not in one tight little package. Takes a little > detective work, but thats part of the fun. > > If you need it all handed to you on a silver platter, that costs > money, so just sit on the sidelines for another year or two and I > promise there will be another 20 books out there awaiting your > purchase. But by then everyone and their mother will be able to write > Rails apps. > > I am anxiously awaiting the Rails Deployment book though, (hint > hint Ezra!)Hehe... Working on it. Deployment has changed *a lot* in the last few months and I have been updating and writing new stuff to keep up. Hang in there just a little bit longer ;) -Ezra> > And now I need to get back to work and stop procrastinating on > mailing lists. :) > > -- > Scott Becker > Electro Interactive, Inc. > Office: 813-333-5508 > http://www.ElectroInteractive.com > > > On 7/31/06, Jose Pepe <jsnit@jsnit.com> wrote: >> Something that I was expecting from RADRails is the possibility of >> using >> the eclipse visual editor to build rhtml pages for ruby. Without a >> drag >> and drop option to create rhtml forms, I do not see how the RADRails >> pulgin uses the power of eclipse. >> >> I will try to create a documentation based on mac os x. >> >> thanks >> >> >> >> >> Mark Blair wrote: >> > Mat Schaffer wrote: >> >> On Jul 31, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Kaori D''Alessio wrote: >> >>> i found this to be very frustrating as well. as a newbie on >> rails, >> >>> it''s >> >>> very hard to find enough information on the best ways to get your >> >>> environment configured. i ended up using InstantRails - which >> is an >> >>> already configured Rails environment that you unzip to a >> directory on >> >>> your machine and then you''re up and running. >> >> >> >> Yeah, I''ll second that. I think a big part of the issue is over- >> >> confidence in the wiki. Which DHH has cited as a regret about the >> >> course of the project. >> >> >> >> It seems that the public at large just doesn''t have a lot of >> talent >> >> for document writing. >> >> >> >> You can look at the silver lining though and realize that limited >> >> documentation means you''re close to the cutting edge of >> development :) >> >> -Mat >> > >> > that''s so funny you say that because i''ve run into a lot of >> > organizations who want to jump aboard the rails movement, BUT >> they cite >> > the lack of support documentation for dev. tools as a reason not >> to move >> > to rails, and thus stay in asp.net or j2ee land. >> > >> > ruby on rails documentation is ok, so i''ve just decided to >> command line >> > everything and write html in notepad++ and let that be it. i >> can be >> > very productive this way until the tools/documentation are more >> mature. >> > >> > after spending a couple of days troubleshooting eclipse w/ rails, i >> > switched to instantrails as well, and i''ve been able to move ahead. >> >> >> -- >> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails mailing list >> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >> > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
This thread is interesting to me. While the documentation may not be what some are familiar with, I find that there is a lot of information on Rails via the mailing list, blogs and google. To be certain, I had zero linux/open source/ruby/rails experience at all one year ago. We were trying to start a business and wanted to use open source software primarily because we were on a budget and secondarily because we didn''t want to get into licensing issues as we grew our business. I experimented with a few packages written in PHP and got frustrated. I started looking for an alternative and found Rails. I can''t say that I never questioned our decision to go open source because I definitely stepped out of my comfort zone at a time when I probably should have stayed in it. However, I wouldn''t change a thing now! I have 10 years of professional development experience in products such as VB, C#, BizTalk, Siebel, FileNet, etc... so by no means am I a novice programmer. However, the open source world was completely new to me and very humbling. I had not even heard of Subversion! I didn''t (don''t) know anywhere nearly as much as the people that contribute to these forums know. BUT... I made my way through it even before rails was officially released. I use RadRails as a development environment. I found the setup to be quite easy (for the whole stack). I have subsequently setup rails on a few other machines via InstantRails which is even easier. And yes, you can make RadRails work very easily with InstantRails installs. The value in rails far outweighs the lack of documentation. I got started with two books - Programming Ruby and Agile Web Development with Rails (AWDR) and this mailing list. Without either of the three above I probably would have had a much harder time. It took me less than 30 days to build a completely functional web-based "mini-crm" system for our business from scratch. This isn''t because I''m good, it''s because Rails is good. To me, this is amazing. I COULD NOT have done it in that timeframe without Rails. Our system imports emails, sends custom email quotes, tracks leads, converts them to orders, tracks the orders, generates PDF documents for customers and vendors and all kinds of other stuff. I''m very happy with Rails. I see a great future for Rails and hope I can capitalize on the semi-ground floor opportunities that it presents. Anyone working with Rails now should realize they have not only a great product and a great set of tools, but also a lot of opportunity if they have the desire. I do consider myself an early adopter but by no means a hacker. If I can get through it then anyone can. I limited myself way too long to Microsoft only development and am quite pleased after stepping out of it. BTW... our phone system uses Asterisk (open source PBX) and hasn''t been touched in almost a year (not even rebooted). We use Thunderbird for email, OpenOffice for spreadsheets, word processing, etc... Sadly, desktops are still Microsoft but that is because I can only get away with so much culture shock at a time! I know one day soon it will all be Linux! Thank you Rails. If you are new to Rails then stick with it, use the forum and buy a book or two - you won''t be disappointed. Best of luck, Michael -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Michael, Cool, I actually have a very similar story & background! And I don''t think we''re unique. Your "mini-crm" sounds great, I''ve built a similar system for our business (though not quite as extensive as yours sounds yet). I''d go into it more but I really need to go to bed! I second the recommendation of the PickAxe and AWDR, as well as Rails Recipes and Ruby For Rails. -- Scott Becker Electro Interactive, Inc. Office: 813-333-5508 http://www.ElectroInteractive.com On 8/1/06, Michael Modica <codeslush@yahoo.com> wrote:> This thread is interesting to me. While the documentation may not be > what some are familiar with, I find that there is a lot of information > on Rails via the mailing list, blogs and google. > > To be certain, I had zero linux/open source/ruby/rails experience at all > one year ago. We were trying to start a business and wanted to use open > source software primarily because we were on a budget and secondarily > because we didn''t want to get into licensing issues as we grew our > business. I experimented with a few packages written in PHP and got > frustrated. I started looking for an alternative and found Rails. I > can''t say that I never questioned our decision to go open source because > I definitely stepped out of my comfort zone at a time when I probably > should have stayed in it. However, I wouldn''t change a thing now! > > I have 10 years of professional development experience in products such > as VB, C#, BizTalk, Siebel, FileNet, etc... so by no means am I a novice > programmer. However, the open source world was completely new to me and > very humbling. I had not even heard of Subversion! I didn''t (don''t) > know anywhere nearly as much as the people that contribute to these > forums know. BUT... I made my way through it even before rails was > officially released. > > I use RadRails as a development environment. I found the setup to be > quite easy (for the whole stack). I have subsequently setup rails on a > few other machines via InstantRails which is even easier. And yes, you > can make RadRails work very easily with InstantRails installs. > > The value in rails far outweighs the lack of documentation. I got > started with two books - Programming Ruby and Agile Web Development with > Rails (AWDR) and this mailing list. Without either of the three above I > probably would have had a much harder time. It took me less than 30 > days to build a completely functional web-based "mini-crm" system for > our business from scratch. This isn''t because I''m good, it''s because > Rails is good. To me, this is amazing. I COULD NOT have done it in > that timeframe without Rails. Our system imports emails, sends custom > email quotes, tracks leads, converts them to orders, tracks the orders, > generates PDF documents for customers and vendors and all kinds of other > stuff. I''m very happy with Rails. > > I see a great future for Rails and hope I can capitalize on the > semi-ground floor opportunities that it presents. Anyone working with > Rails now should realize they have not only a great product and a great > set of tools, but also a lot of opportunity if they have the desire. I > do consider myself an early adopter but by no means a hacker. If I can > get through it then anyone can. I limited myself way too long to > Microsoft only development and am quite pleased after stepping out of > it. > > BTW... our phone system uses Asterisk (open source PBX) and hasn''t been > touched in almost a year (not even rebooted). We use Thunderbird for > email, OpenOffice for spreadsheets, word processing, etc... Sadly, > desktops are still Microsoft but that is because I can only get away > with so much culture shock at a time! I know one day soon it will all > be Linux! > > Thank you Rails. If you are new to Rails then stick with it, use the > forum and buy a book or two - you won''t be disappointed. > > Best of luck, > > Michael > > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-- Scott Becker Electro Interactive, Inc. Office: 813-333-5508 http://www.ElectroInteractive.com
Michael, I am also an IT professional, using most of the time the .Net platform. And something that I like in the .Net and Eclipse environment is the IDE tools that allows to create very easily forms and reports just dragging and dropping controls. Also the code behind allows to code in VB or C# separating the HTML code form the programming code. I hope this functionality will be integrated in Eclipse/RadRails in one of the future releases. Because you decided to use RADRails, I would like to know if you can share any link where we can find useful information to create Rails projects. Thanks Scott Becker wrote:> Michael, > > Cool, I actually have a very similar story & background! And I don''t > think we''re unique. Your "mini-crm" sounds great, I''ve built a similar > system for our business (though not quite as extensive as yours sounds > yet). I''d go into it more but I really need to go to bed! > > I second the recommendation of the PickAxe and AWDR, as well as Rails > Recipes and Ruby For Rails. > > -- > Scott Becker > Electro Interactive, Inc. > Office: 813-333-5508 > http://www.ElectroInteractive.com > > On 8/1/06, Michael Modica <codeslush@yahoo.com> wrote: >> can''t say that I never questioned our decision to go open source because >> >> our business from scratch. This isn''t because I''m good, it''s because >> do consider myself an early adopter but by no means a hacker. If I can >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails mailing list >> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >> > > > -- > Scott Becker > Electro Interactive, Inc. > Office: 813-333-5508 > http://www.ElectroInteractive.com-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Jose Pepe wrote: When I said:> I like in the .Net and Eclipse environment is the IDE > tools that allows to create very easily forms and reports just dragging > and dropping controls. Also the code behind allows to code in VB or C# > separating the HTML code form the programming code. I hope this > functionality will be integrated in Eclipse/RadRails in one of the > future releases.I mean that I would like to see in RadRails the dragging> and dropping controlls functionalities-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Jose, Your comments: ... I mean that I would like to see in RadRails the dragging and dropping controlls functionalities... ... Also the code behind allows to code in VB or C# separating the HTML code form the programming code... My Reply: Visual Studio .NET is an awesome development tool. The code-behind feature was one of just many significant improvements over the earlier versions of Visual Studio. While RadRails isn''t there yet, I think you may find as you write your projects that you can do away with that functionality. Drag-Drop placement of controls/layout would be cool, but the code-behind is not at all necessary in my opinion. Regardless, I have found that I''m pretty efficient in RadRails even without the .NET type of functionality. I miss the debug facilities of .NET tremendously as well as code completion (ctrl space), but I can also say that I haven''t explored in depth those features for Ruby/Rails. Funny thing is...I don''t have to debug as much because most of this stuff just "works." Seriously - connecting to and reading from the db, paginating, sorting, searching, etc...you aren''t building custom controls to handle this stuff - it just works with the framework. As for useful links - I strongly urge you to purchase the two books that I mentioned in an earlier post. I also find the Wiki at Ruby On Rails useful when I KNOW what I''m looking for. There is a "getting started" guide somewhere for rails and I think it is titled "Rolling with Rails." The following links are on my favorites and may be beneficial: http://www.agilewebdevelopment.com/ http://blog.nanorails.com/pages/rails_1.1_cheat_sheet http://www.rubyinside.com/19-rails-tricks-most-rails-coders-dont-know-131.html http://www.rubyinside.com/16-rjs-resources-and-tutorials-for-rails-programmers-5.html and of course: http://www.ruby-forum.com/forum/3 The Search feature is down, so you can use google to search it or find all of these posts at this URL: http://www.nabble.com/RubyOnRails-Users-f13831.html I have subsequently purchased an ebook on RJS templates called "RJS Templates for Rails" (if you are going to use AJAX or have rails generate your javascript then it is a huge plus). You can find a link to it from the 16-rjs-resources... url above. I try to make a daily habit of reading these forums. Some stuff doesn''t interest me, but most of it does. You can absorb a lot of information just by reading the replies to questions. Much of it won''t matter until you actually start a project. If you are going to stay on Windows then you may as well use InstantRails for your initial setup. Once you have done that, search this forum to figure out how to get RadRails fully functional with the InstantRails install. Also, give http://softiesonrails.com/ a look - it is geared for those of us with Microsoft backgrounds. Dive in! I have historically found the best way to learn anything is by getting thrown in the fire. The fire isn''t as hot if you at least purchase the AWDR book and give it a quick read. You can read the entire book in a day. Don''t worry about memorizing everything - just read it fast, grasp the concepts then go back and re-read or reference as necessary. I''m confident it will give you enough of the "big picture" so that you can get up and running quickly. Let me know if I can provide any other info... Regards, Michael -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Michael, my man, you think your company is willing to license your mini-crm tool? I need something similar to what you''ve built and was going to build in RoR, but if you have something that meets my needs, if the price is right, I''d buy a version of it. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Kaori D''Alessio wrote:> Michael, my man, you think your company is willing to license your > mini-crm tool? I need something similar to what you''ve built and was > going to build in RoR, but if you have something that meets my needs, if > the price is right, I''d buy a version of it.Kaori, I actually want to open source our tool - but haven''t had the time to get around to making it "generic" enough for other industries and would like to do that before I set it into the wild for people to scrutinize! :-) It would be very easy to modify and I definitely would like to talk to you in further detail. I can send some screenshots for you too. Someday soon I''ll put a demo version of it online - maybe in the next week. Until then I can let you see what it is about a different way. Please email me at mmodica at cox dot net or codeslush at yahoo dot com and we can figure out how to chat off this mailing list. Thanks, Michael -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Michael thank you for all the information you shared here. Modica wrote:> Kaori D''Alessio wrote: >> Michael, my man, you think your company is willing to license your >> mini-crm tool? I need something similar to what you''ve built and was >> going to build in RoR, but if you have something that meets my needs, if >> the price is right, I''d buy a version of it. > > Kaori, > > I actually want to open source our tool - but haven''t had the time to > get around to making it "generic" enough for other industries and would > like to do that before I set it into the wild for people to scrutinize! > :-) It would be very easy to modify and I definitely would like to talk > to you in further detail. I can send some screenshots for you too. > Someday soon I''ll put a demo version of it online - maybe in the next > week. Until then I can let you see what it is about a different way. > > Please email me at mmodica at cox dot net or codeslush at yahoo dot com > and we can figure out how to chat off this mailing list. > > Thanks, > > Michael-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
I think RadRails is awesome!! Perhaps they are lacking documentation but I have followed them since version 0.3 and I must say they are working really hard to make this thing properly. The whole community should be the ones commenting and increasing the documentation. However, if there are some new features, the community will not know unless they tell us :) I have been trying to setup the new Rake tasks view but it appears not to be working. I can''t see any of tasks. Is that supposed to happen? Is it a bug? Can anyone help me here Cheers -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Rath, I ad the blog o the RadRails web site and it looks like their are preparing somehting good. But they can not comment it by them moment!!! --- wrote:> I think RadRails is awesome!! > > Perhaps they are lacking documentation but I have followed them since > version 0.3 and I must say they are working really hard to make this > thing properly. The whole community should be the ones commenting and > increasing the documentation. However, if there are some new features, > the community will not know unless they tell us :) > > I have been trying to setup the new Rake tasks view but it appears not > to be working. I can''t see any of tasks. Is that supposed to happen? Is > it a bug? Can anyone help me here > > Cheers-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.