Someone mentioned that Rmagick doesn''t work properly on this setup (Ruby 1.8.4, Rails 1.1) Is this true? -- seth at subimage interactive http://www.subimage.com/sublog/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060411/432e8113/attachment.html
It does not on windows. The binary is compiled against rails 1.8.2 and will cause a ton of rails problems. I''m not sure if it works on linux/unix. On 4/11/06, subimage interactive <subimage@gmail.com> wrote:> > Someone mentioned that Rmagick doesn''t work properly on this setup (Ruby > 1.8.4, Rails 1.1) > > Is this true? > > -- > seth at subimage interactive > http://www.subimage.com/sublog/ > > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060411/3d267c0a/attachment-0001.html
subimage interactive wrote:> Someone mentioned that Rmagick doesn''t work properly on this setup (Ruby > 1.8.4, Rails 1.1) > > Is this true?That''s been my experience. Running RMagick in Rails with Ruby 1.8.4 caused errors when tab characters are used in an RHTML view. It''s something to do with a method that''s overloaded by both RMagick and the ERb interpreter, or something like that. I downgraded to Ruby 1.8.2 and things have been working fine. Jeff Coleman -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
I''m happily running Ruby 1.8.4, Rails 1.1.2, and RMagick 1.10.1 on OS X and FreeBSD without any problems. Pete Yandell http://9cays.com On 12/04/2006, at 6:08 AM, Shane Sherman wrote:> It does not on windows. The binary is compiled against rails 1.8.2 > and will cause a ton of rails problems. I''m not sure if it works on > linux/unix. > > On 4/11/06, subimage interactive <subimage@gmail.com> wrote: > Someone mentioned that Rmagick doesn''t work properly on this setup > (Ruby 1.8.4, Rails 1.1) > > Is this true? > > -- > seth at subimage interactive > http://www.subimage.com/sublog/ > > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
How about running Rails 1.1.2 with Ruby 1.8.2? -- seth at subimage interactive http://www.subimage.com/sublog/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060411/682e326e/attachment.html
subimage interactive wrote:> How about running Rails 1.1.2 with Ruby 1.8.2?I''m running Rails 1.1.2 with Ruby 1.8.2 and haven''t experienced any problems so far. The 1.8.4/RMagick issues are Windows-only. Jeff -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Hi Jeff ~> That''s been my experience. Running RMagick in Rails with Ruby 1.8.4 > caused errors when tab characters are used in an RHTML view. It''s > something to do with a method that''s overloaded by both RMagick and the > ERb interpreter, or something like that.The tab character errors have nothing to do with RMagick from what I understand. I just did a quick run through my site cleaning up the tabs (which Linux had no issue with) and voila... It really is a better practice to use spaces in place of tabs. I have EditPlus on Windows set up to do two spaces when I hit tab instead of the tab character. ~ Ben On 4/11/06, Jeff Coleman <progressions@gmail.com> wrote:> subimage interactive wrote: > > How about running Rails 1.1.2 with Ruby 1.8.2? > > I''m running Rails 1.1.2 with Ruby 1.8.2 and haven''t experienced any > problems so far. > > The 1.8.4/RMagick issues are Windows-only. > > Jeff > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-- Ben Reubenstein http://www.benr75.com
Forget Rmagick, it''s a pain in the ass to compile all dependencies for (on Mac OS X) and it''s very hungry on memory when handling images. I find Minimagick much ''leaner'', it''s a nice wrapper for the commandline versions. This way, you don''t have to worry about the compile hell that is RMagick, en bypass any memory/garbage collection issue. http://journal.gleepglop.com/articles/2005/12/04/imagemagick-the-ruby-way Just my practical, humble opinion (a.k.a. two cents) Ben Reubenstein wrote:> Hi Jeff ~ > >> That''s been my experience. Running RMagick in Rails with Ruby 1.8.4 >> caused errors when tab characters are used in an RHTML view. It''s >> something to do with a method that''s overloaded by both RMagick and the >> ERb interpreter, or something like that. > > The tab character errors have nothing to do with RMagick from what I > understand. I just did a quick run through my site cleaning up the > tabs (which Linux had no issue with) and voila... It really is a > better practice to use spaces in place of tabs. I have EditPlus on > Windows set up to do two spaces when I hit tab instead of the tab > character. > > ~ Ben > > On 4/11/06, Jeff Coleman <progressions@gmail.com> wrote: >> -- >> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails mailing list >> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >> > > > -- > Ben Reubenstein > http://www.benr75.com-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
subimage interactive
2006-Apr-12 21:17 UTC
[Rails] Re: Re: Ruby 1.8.4, Rails 1.1 and Rmagick?
Yes but does Minimagick run on XP and Unix? I routinely develop across XP and OSX and deploy on UNIX. Rmagick is the only thing I know that works (semi-ok) on all 3. On 4/12/06, Nicky Peeters <nicky.peeters@pandora.be> wrote:> > Forget Rmagick, it''s a pain in the ass to compile all dependencies for > (on Mac OS X) and it''s very hungry on memory when handling images. I > find Minimagick much ''leaner'', it''s a nice wrapper for the commandline > versions. This way, you don''t have to worry about the compile hell that > is RMagick, en bypass any memory/garbage collection issue. > > http://journal.gleepglop.com/articles/2005/12/04/imagemagick-the-ruby-way > > Just my practical, humble opinion (a.k.a. two cents) > > Ben Reubenstein wrote: > > Hi Jeff ~ > > > >> That''s been my experience. Running RMagick in Rails with Ruby 1.8.4 > >> caused errors when tab characters are used in an RHTML view. It''s > >> something to do with a method that''s overloaded by both RMagick and the > >> ERb interpreter, or something like that. > > > > The tab character errors have nothing to do with RMagick from what I > > understand. I just did a quick run through my site cleaning up the > > tabs (which Linux had no issue with) and voila... It really is a > > better practice to use spaces in place of tabs. I have EditPlus on > > Windows set up to do two spaces when I hit tab instead of the tab > > character. > > > > ~ Ben > > > > On 4/11/06, Jeff Coleman <progressions@gmail.com> wrote: > >> -- > >> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Rails mailing list > >> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > >> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > >> > > > > > > -- > > Ben Reubenstein > > http://www.benr75.com > > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-- seth at subimage interactive http://www.subimage.com/sublog/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060412/4b8b6e7a/attachment.html