Rails - Apr 2006 - Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies

The new gem version dependency system from Rails 1.1.1 needed a few
tweaks to work properly and to stop throwing meaningless warnings.
This tiny release makes up for that. To install:

* gem install rails
* rake rails:update:configs (to get the latest config/boot.rb)

This release also signals our new commitment to do more tiny releases
from the stable branch, which only gets bug fixes. So it will not be
uncommon to see bi-weekly tiny releases in the 1.1.x series while we
continue to add features to the forthcoming 1.2.0.
--
David Heinemeier Hansson
http://www.loudthinking.com -- Broadcasting Brain
http://www.basecamphq.com   -- Online project management
http://www.backpackit.com   -- Personal information manager
http://www.rubyonrails.com  -- Web-application framework

David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:
> The new gem version dependency system from Rails 1.1.1 needed a few
> tweaks to work properly and to stop throwing meaningless warnings.
> This tiny release makes up for that. To install:
> 
> * gem install rails
> * rake rails:update:configs (to get the latest config/boot.rb)
> 
> This release also signals our new commitment to do more tiny releases
> from the stable branch, which only gets bug fixes. So it will not be
> uncommon to see bi-weekly tiny releases in the 1.1.x series while we
> continue to add features to the forthcoming 1.2.0.
Thank you!  Sounds like we''ll be getting the best of both worlds (cool 
new features in 1.2.0 and tiny bugfix releases in 1.1.x).

Looks like it is going to be an amazing year for Rails...

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, I received the following when I tried to perform the following command:

rake rails:update:configs
rake aborted!
No Rakefile found (looking for: rakefile, Rakefile, rakefile.rb, Rakefile.rb)
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:1822:in
`load_rakefile''
(See full trace by running task with --trace)


On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan>
wrote:
> David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:
> > The new gem version dependency system from Rails 1.1.1 needed a few
> > tweaks to work properly and to stop throwing meaningless warnings.
> > This tiny release makes up for that. To install:
> >
> > * gem install rails
> > * rake rails:update:configs (to get the latest config/boot.rb)
> >
> > This release also signals our new commitment to do more tiny releases
> > from the stable branch, which only gets bug fixes. So it will not be
> > uncommon to see bi-weekly tiny releases in the 1.1.x series while we
> > continue to add features to the forthcoming 1.2.0.
>
> Thank you!  Sounds like we''ll be getting the best of both worlds
(cool
> new features in 1.2.0 and tiny bugfix releases in 1.1.x).
>
> Looks like it is going to be an amazing year for Rails...
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>

On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi, I received the following when I tried to perform the following
> command:
>
> rake rails:update:configs
> rake aborted!
> No Rakefile found (looking for: rakefile, Rakefile, rakefile.rb,
> Rakefile.rb)
> /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:1822:in
> `load_rakefile''
> (See full trace by running task with --trace)
>
Hi Conrad.  Make sure you are in the root directory of your relevant rails
applications when you run that second command.

-Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060409/c24d1b31/attachment.html

How many versions of rails can one install at a time?  I''m needing to
use 1.0 because the hosting account is using ths version.  Also, I
would like to experiment with the new features.

Thanks in advance,

-Conrad

On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi, I received the following when I tried to perform the following command:
>
> rake rails:update:configs
> rake aborted!
> No Rakefile found (looking for: rakefile, Rakefile, rakefile.rb,
Rakefile.rb)
> /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:1822:in
`load_rakefile''
> (See full trace by running task with --trace)
>
>
> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote:
> > David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:
> > > The new gem version dependency system from Rails 1.1.1 needed a
few
> > > tweaks to work properly and to stop throwing meaningless
warnings.
> > > This tiny release makes up for that. To install:
> > >
> > > * gem install rails
> > > * rake rails:update:configs (to get the latest config/boot.rb)
> > >
> > > This release also signals our new commitment to do more tiny
releases
> > > from the stable branch, which only gets bug fixes. So it will not
be
> > > uncommon to see bi-weekly tiny releases in the 1.1.x series while
we
> > > continue to add features to the forthcoming 1.2.0.
> >
> > Thank you!  Sounds like we''ll be getting the best of both
worlds (cool
> > new features in 1.2.0 and tiny bugfix releases in 1.1.x).
> >
> > Looks like it is going to be an amazing year for Rails...
> >
> > --
> > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rails mailing list
> > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> >
>

You can use the:

rake rails:freeze:edge TAG=rel_1-0-0

Which will deploy 1.0.0 on that rails app.

-Nb


On 4/9/06 4:58 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
> How many versions of rails can one install at a time?  I''m needing
to
> use 1.0 because the hosting account is using ths version.  Also, I
> would like to experiment with the new features.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> -Conrad
> 
> On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi, I received the following when I tried to perform the following
command:
>> 
>> rake rails:update:configs
>> rake aborted!
>> No Rakefile found (looking for: rakefile, Rakefile, rakefile.rb,
Rakefile.rb)
>> /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:1822:in
>> `load_rakefile''
>> (See full trace by running task with --trace)
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote:
>>> David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:
>>>> The new gem version dependency system from Rails 1.1.1 needed a
few
>>>> tweaks to work properly and to stop throwing meaningless
warnings.
>>>> This tiny release makes up for that. To install:
>>>> 
>>>> * gem install rails
>>>> * rake rails:update:configs (to get the latest config/boot.rb)
>>>> 
>>>> This release also signals our new commitment to do more tiny
releases
>>>> from the stable branch, which only gets bug fixes. So it will
not be
>>>> uncommon to see bi-weekly tiny releases in the 1.1.x series
while we
>>>> continue to add features to the forthcoming 1.2.0.
>>> 
>>> Thank you!  Sounds like we''ll be getting the best of both
worlds (cool
>>> new features in 1.2.0 and tiny bugfix releases in 1.1.x).
>>> 
>>> Looks like it is going to be an amazing year for Rails...
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rails mailing list
>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nathaniel S. H. Brown? ? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?http://nshb.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem cleanup after
installing 1.0''?  Also, is it possible to select a version of rails to
develop with upon rails project creation?

Thanks in advance,

-Conrad

On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com>
wrote:
> You can use the:
>
> rake rails:freeze:edge TAG=rel_1-0-0
>
> Which will deploy 1.0.0 on that rails app.
>
> -Nb
>
>
> On 4/9/06 4:58 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> > How many versions of rails can one install at a time?  I''m
needing to
> > use 1.0 because the hosting account is using ths version.  Also, I
> > would like to experiment with the new features.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > -Conrad
> >
> > On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi, I received the following when I tried to perform the following
command:
> >>
> >> rake rails:update:configs
> >> rake aborted!
> >> No Rakefile found (looking for: rakefile, Rakefile, rakefile.rb,
Rakefile.rb)
> >> /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:1822:in
> >> `load_rakefile''
> >> (See full trace by running task with --trace)
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote:
> >>> David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:
> >>>> The new gem version dependency system from Rails 1.1.1
needed a few
> >>>> tweaks to work properly and to stop throwing meaningless
warnings.
> >>>> This tiny release makes up for that. To install:
> >>>>
> >>>> * gem install rails
> >>>> * rake rails:update:configs (to get the latest
config/boot.rb)
> >>>>
> >>>> This release also signals our new commitment to do more
tiny releases
> >>>> from the stable branch, which only gets bug fixes. So it
will not be
> >>>> uncommon to see bi-weekly tiny releases in the 1.1.x
series while we
> >>>> continue to add features to the forthcoming 1.2.0.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you!  Sounds like we''ll be getting the best of
both worlds (cool
> >>> new features in 1.2.0 and tiny bugfix releases in 1.1.x).
> >>>
> >>> Looks like it is going to be an amazing year for Rails...
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Rails mailing list
> >>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> >>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> >>>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rails mailing list
> > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>

Conrad Taylor wrote:
> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem cleanup after
> installing 1.0''?  Also, is it possible to select a version of
rails to
> develop with upon rails project creation?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> -Conrad
Try this link.

http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search engines made in the
past
decade.

If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into Google and bam! 
You get numerous relevant hits.  Same thing goes for error messages.

Try it out.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use any version of rails on
my remote host?  BTW, the remote host is current running 1.0?

-Conrad

On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan>
wrote:
>
> Conrad Taylor wrote:
> > Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem cleanup after
> > installing 1.0''?  Also, is it possible to select a version of
rails to
> > develop with upon rails project creation?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > -Conrad
>
> Try this link.
>
>
>
http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
>
> I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search engines made in
the past
> decade.
>
> If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into Google and bam!
> You get numerous relevant hits.  Same thing goes for error messages.
>
> Try it out.
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060410/fc83a586/attachment.html

The TAG option for rake rails:freeze:edge came out with 1.1.0, so you will
need to have at least one package installed with it.

You can install into a directory which you don''t even use other than
for
deployment.

For example, on your remote server with 1.0.

Deploy a frozen edge.

rails ./ 
rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+

Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use to deploy
into other directories.

So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would like.

rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0
rails ./

Now, one thing I haven''t tested, would be whether or not an older
version of
Rake will work like this (it should). Only way to know for sure is to try,
so let me know how it goes :)

-Nb 

On 4/9/06 9:20 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use any version of rails on
> my remote host?  BTW, the remote host is current running 1.0?
> 
> -Conrad
> 
> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote:
>> 
>> Conrad Taylor wrote:
>>> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem cleanup
after
>>> installing 1.0''?  Also, is it possible to select a version
of rails to
>>> develop with upon rails project creation?
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> 
>>> -Conrad
>> 
>> Try this link.
>> 
>> 
>>
http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8&
>> oe=utf-8
>> 
>> I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search engines made
in the past
>> decade.
>> 
>> If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into Google and
bam!
>> You get numerous relevant hits.  Same thing goes for error messages.
>> 
>> Try it out.
>> 
>> --
>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rails mailing list
>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nathaniel S. H. Brown? ? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?http://nshb.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A slight modification to this..


On 4/9/06 9:33 PM, "Nathaniel Brown" <nshb@inimit.com> wrote:
> The TAG option for rake rails:freeze:edge came out with 1.1.0, so you will
> need to have at least one package installed with it.
> 
> You can install into a directory which you don''t even use other
than for
> deployment.
> 
> For example, on your remote server with 1.0.
> 
> Deploy a frozen edge.
> 
> rails ./ 
> rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+
> 
> Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use to deploy
> into other directories.
> 
> So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would like.
> 
At this point you would deploy the same version you are using into the
target:

rails /path/to/target/rails --freeze

And now you would downgrade it to 1.0.0

rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0

Would be nice to be able to have a REL tag in the rails command. I just
submitted a enhancement suggestion for this at:

http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4677

-Nb
> 
> Now, one thing I haven''t tested, would be whether or not an older
version of
> Rake will work like this (it should). Only way to know for sure is to try,
> so let me know how it goes :)
> 
> -Nb 
> 
> On 4/9/06 9:20 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 
>> So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use any version of
rails on
>> my remote host?  BTW, the remote host is current running 1.0?
>> 
>> -Conrad
>> 
>> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Conrad Taylor wrote:
>>>> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem
cleanup after
>>>> installing 1.0''?  Also, is it possible to select a
version of rails to
>>>> develop with upon rails project creation?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>> 
>>>> -Conrad
>>> 
>>> Try this link.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8>>>
&
>>> oe=utf-8
>>> 
>>> I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search engines
made in the past
>>> decade.
>>> 
>>> If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into Google and
bam!
>>> You get numerous relevant hits.  Same thing goes for error
messages.
>>> 
>>> Try it out.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rails mailing list
>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rails mailing list
>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Nathaniel S. H. Brown? ? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?http://nshb.net
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nathaniel S. H. Brown? ? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?http://nshb.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hey Nathaniel, thanks for all the information.  After reading about Edge
Rails, this simply what I need to do because my host is at 1.0 and I simply
like to do rails apps that are 1.1+.  Now, I have the following question(s):


1)  After installing the edge rails locally on my system, is there a
different process for installing
     the remaining gems?  At this time, my getting started projects
don''t
use Subversion but it
     seems that I should start.

I''ll setup SVN and follow the require steps to get Edge Rails installed
for
ongoing RoR projects.

Thanks again,

-Conrad

On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com>
wrote:
>
> A slight modification to this..
>
>
> On 4/9/06 9:33 PM, "Nathaniel Brown" < nshb@inimit.com>
wrote:
>
> > The TAG option for rake rails:freeze:edge came out with 1.1.0, so you
> will
> > need to have at least one package installed with it.
> >
> > You can install into a directory which you don''t even use
other than for
>
> > deployment.
> >
> > For example, on your remote server with 1.0.
> >
> > Deploy a frozen edge.
> >
> > rails ./
> > rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+
> >
> > Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use to
> deploy
> > into other directories.
> >
> > So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would
like.
> >
>
> At this point you would deploy the same version you are using into the
> target:
>
> rails /path/to/target/rails --freeze
>
> And now you would downgrade it to 1.0.0
>
> rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0
>
> Would be nice to be able to have a REL tag in the rails command. I just
> submitted a enhancement suggestion for this at:
>
> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4677
>
> -Nb
>
> >
> > Now, one thing I haven''t tested, would be whether or not an
older
> version of
> > Rake will work like this (it should). Only way to know for sure is to
> try,
> > so let me know how it goes :)
> >
> > -Nb
> >
> > On 4/9/06 9:20 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <
conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use any version of
> rails on
> >> my remote host?  BTW, the remote host is current running 1.0?
> >>
> >> -Conrad
> >>
> >> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Conrad Taylor wrote:
> >>>> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem
cleanup after
> >>>> installing 1.0''?  Also, is it possible to select
a version of rails
> to
> >>>> develop with upon rails project creation?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks in advance,
> >>>>
> >>>> -Conrad
> >>>
> >>> Try this link.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8
> >>>
> &
> >>> oe=utf-8
> >>>
> >>> I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search
engines made in the
> past
> >>> decade.
> >>>
> >>> If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into
Google and
> bam!
> >>> You get numerous relevant hits.  Same thing goes for error
messages.
> >>>
> >>> Try it out.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Rails mailing list
> >>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> >>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Rails mailing list
> >> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> >> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> >
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rails mailing list
> > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060410/3d4f4551/attachment-0001.html

Hey Nathaniel, I actually would like to deploy a rails 1.1.2 or later
application to a target (i.e. remote host) that has 1.0 installed.  Next, I
guess the non-development rails application folder should house the SVN
updates that are used with later projects. Now, is there an easy way to when
invoking the rails command to create the application folder to pull in the
stuff from the template application (i.e. vendor directory)?

-Conrad

On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>  Hey Nathaniel, thanks for all the information.  After reading about Edge
> Rails, this simply what I need to do because my host is at 1.0 and I
> simply like to do rails apps that are 1.1+.  Now, I have the following
> question(s):
>
> 1)  After installing the edge rails locally on my system, is there a
> different process for installing
>      the remaining gems?  At this time, my getting started projects
don''t
> use Subversion but it
>      seems that I should start.
>
> I''ll setup SVN and follow the require steps to get Edge Rails
installed
> for ongoing RoR projects.
>
> Thanks again,
>
> -Conrad
>
> On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com> wrote:
> >
> > A slight modification to this..
> >
> >
> > On 4/9/06 9:33 PM, "Nathaniel Brown" <
nshb@inimit.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The TAG option for rake rails:freeze:edge came out with 1.1.0, so
you
> > will
> > > need to have at least one package installed with it.
> > >
> > > You can install into a directory which you don''t even
use other than
> > for
> > > deployment.
> > >
> > > For example, on your remote server with 1.0.
> > >
> > > Deploy a frozen edge.
> > >
> > > rails ./
> > > rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+
> > >
> > > Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use
to
> > deploy
> > > into other directories.
> > >
> > > So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would
> > like.
> > >
> >
> > At this point you would deploy the same version you are using into the
> > target:
> >
> > rails /path/to/target/rails --freeze
> >
> > And now you would downgrade it to 1.0.0
> >
> > rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0
> >
> > Would be nice to be able to have a REL tag in the rails command. I
just
> > submitted a enhancement suggestion for this at:
> >
> > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4677
> >
> > -Nb
> >
> > >
> > > Now, one thing I haven''t tested, would be whether or not
an older
> > version of
> > > Rake will work like this (it should). Only way to know for sure
is to
> > try,
> > > so let me know how it goes :)
> > >
> > > -Nb
> > >
> > > On 4/9/06 9:20 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <
conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use any
version of
> > rails on
> > >> my remote host?  BTW, the remote host is current running 1.0?
> > >>
> > >> -Conrad
> > >>
> > >> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons < pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Conrad Taylor wrote:
> > >>>> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed
''gem cleanup after
> > >>>> installing 1.0''?  Also, is it possible to
select a version of rails
> > to
> > >>>> develop with upon rails project creation?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks in advance,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -Conrad
> > >>>
> > >>> Try this link.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> >
http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8
> > >>>
> > &
> > >>> oe=utf-8
> > >>>
> > >>> I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search
engines made in the
> > past
> > >>> decade.
> > >>>
> > >>> If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into
Google and
> > bam!
> > >>> You get numerous relevant hits.  Same thing goes for
error messages.
> > >>>
> > >>> Try it out.
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/ .
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Rails mailing list
> > >>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> > >>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> > >>>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Rails mailing list
> > >> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> > >> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> > >
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Rails mailing list
> > > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> > > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> >
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rails mailing list
> > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060410/dd221b3b/attachment.html

Using the -f (--freeze) uses the vendor, or current deployment for the rails
update.

So if I am in a rails project (which has vendor/rails frozen to edge):

/rails/edge/# rails /path/to/new/project -f

That directory will also get edge version based on the fact that I deployed
it with the -f/--freeze flag. From what I understand, it will only deploy
the rails directory, but you may want to verify this yourself.

I outlined the steps before how to get up to 1.1.2. Re-read my previous
emails. 

-Nb


On 4/9/06 10:19 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Nathaniel, I actually would like to deploy a rails 1.1.2 or later
> application to a target (i.e. remote host) that has 1.0 installed.  Next, I
> guess the non-development rails application folder should house the SVN
> updates that are used with later projects. Now, is there an easy way to
when
> invoking the rails command to create the application folder to pull in the
> stuff from the template application (i.e. vendor directory)?
> 
> -Conrad
> 
> On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>  Hey Nathaniel, thanks for all the information.  After reading about
Edge
>> Rails, this simply what I need to do because my host is at 1.0 and I
>> simply like to do rails apps that are 1.1+.  Now, I have the following
>> question(s):
>> 
>> 1)  After installing the edge rails locally on my system, is there a
>> different process for installing
>>      the remaining gems?  At this time, my getting started projects
don''t
>> use Subversion but it
>>      seems that I should start.
>> 
>> I''ll setup SVN and follow the require steps to get Edge Rails
installed
>> for ongoing RoR projects.
>> 
>> Thanks again,
>> 
>> -Conrad
>> 
>> On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> A slight modification to this..
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 4/9/06 9:33 PM, "Nathaniel Brown" <
nshb@inimit.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The TAG option for rake rails:freeze:edge came out with 1.1.0,
so you
>>> will
>>>> need to have at least one package installed with it.
>>>> 
>>>> You can install into a directory which you don''t even
use other than
>>> for
>>>> deployment.
>>>> 
>>>> For example, on your remote server with 1.0.
>>>> 
>>>> Deploy a frozen edge.
>>>> 
>>>> rails ./
>>>> rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+
>>>> 
>>>> Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use
to
>>> deploy
>>>> into other directories.
>>>> 
>>>> So you could use this command to get any tagged release you
would
>>> like.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> At this point you would deploy the same version you are using into
the
>>> target:
>>> 
>>> rails /path/to/target/rails --freeze
>>> 
>>> And now you would downgrade it to 1.0.0
>>> 
>>> rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0
>>> 
>>> Would be nice to be able to have a REL tag in the rails command. I
just
>>> submitted a enhancement suggestion for this at:
>>> 
>>> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4677
>>> 
>>> -Nb
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Now, one thing I haven''t tested, would be whether or
not an older
>>> version of
>>>> Rake will work like this (it should). Only way to know for sure
is to
>>> try,
>>>> so let me know how it goes :)
>>>> 
>>>> -Nb
>>>> 
>>>> On 4/9/06 9:20 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <
conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use any
version of
>>> rails on
>>>>> my remote host?  BTW, the remote host is current running
1.0?
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Conrad
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons < pgibbons@initech.lan>
wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Conrad Taylor wrote:
>>>>>>> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed
''gem cleanup after
>>>>>>> installing 1.0''?  Also, is it possible to
select a version of rails
>>> to
>>>>>>> develop with upon rails project creation?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -Conrad
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Try this link.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>> 
>>>
http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8
>>>>>> 
>>> &
>>>>>> oe=utf-8
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think you''ll be amazed at the advances
search engines made in the
>>> past
>>>>>> decade.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it
into Google and
>>> bam!
>>>>>> You get numerous relevant hits.  Same thing goes for
error messages.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Try it out.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/ .
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Rails mailing list
>>>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>>>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Rails mailing list
>>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>>> 
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Rails mailing list
>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>> 
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rails mailing list
>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nathaniel S. H. Brown? ? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?http://nshb.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hi, thanks for the information.  I don''t have access to any command
line on the remote server.  Thus, in you previous e-mail, I cannot
perform the following:

BEGIN PREVIOUS TRANSCRIPT:

For example, on your remote server with 1.0.

Deploy a frozen edge.

rails ./
rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+

Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use to deploy
into other directories.

So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would like.

rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0
rails ./

END PREVIOUS TRANSCRIPT:

-Conrad

On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com>
wrote:
> Using the -f (--freeze) uses the vendor, or current deployment for the
rails
> update.
>
> So if I am in a rails project (which has vendor/rails frozen to edge):
>
> /rails/edge/# rails /path/to/new/project -f
>
> That directory will also get edge version based on the fact that I deployed
> it with the -f/--freeze flag. From what I understand, it will only deploy
> the rails directory, but you may want to verify this yourself.
>
> I outlined the steps before how to get up to 1.1.2. Re-read my previous
> emails.
>
> -Nb
>
>
> On 4/9/06 10:19 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> > Hey Nathaniel, I actually would like to deploy a rails 1.1.2 or later
> > application to a target (i.e. remote host) that has 1.0 installed. 
Next, I
> > guess the non-development rails application folder should house the
SVN
> > updates that are used with later projects. Now, is there an easy way
to when
> > invoking the rails command to create the application folder to pull in
the
> > stuff from the template application (i.e. vendor directory)?
> >
> > -Conrad
> >
> > On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>  Hey Nathaniel, thanks for all the information.  After reading
about Edge
> >> Rails, this simply what I need to do because my host is at 1.0 and
I
> >> simply like to do rails apps that are 1.1+.  Now, I have the
following
> >> question(s):
> >>
> >> 1)  After installing the edge rails locally on my system, is there
a
> >> different process for installing
> >>      the remaining gems?  At this time, my getting started
projects don''t
> >> use Subversion but it
> >>      seems that I should start.
> >>
> >> I''ll setup SVN and follow the require steps to get Edge
Rails installed
> >> for ongoing RoR projects.
> >>
> >> Thanks again,
> >>
> >> -Conrad
> >>
> >> On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> A slight modification to this..
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 4/9/06 9:33 PM, "Nathaniel Brown" <
nshb@inimit.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The TAG option for rake rails:freeze:edge came out with
1.1.0, so you
> >>> will
> >>>> need to have at least one package installed with it.
> >>>>
> >>>> You can install into a directory which you don''t
even use other than
> >>> for
> >>>> deployment.
> >>>>
> >>>> For example, on your remote server with 1.0.
> >>>>
> >>>> Deploy a frozen edge.
> >>>>
> >>>> rails ./
> >>>> rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+
> >>>>
> >>>> Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you
can use to
> >>> deploy
> >>>> into other directories.
> >>>>
> >>>> So you could use this command to get any tagged release
you would
> >>> like.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> At this point you would deploy the same version you are using
into the
> >>> target:
> >>>
> >>> rails /path/to/target/rails --freeze
> >>>
> >>> And now you would downgrade it to 1.0.0
> >>>
> >>> rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0
> >>>
> >>> Would be nice to be able to have a REL tag in the rails
command. I just
> >>> submitted a enhancement suggestion for this at:
> >>>
> >>> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4677
> >>>
> >>> -Nb
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Now, one thing I haven''t tested, would be whether
or not an older
> >>> version of
> >>>> Rake will work like this (it should). Only way to know for
sure is to
> >>> try,
> >>>> so let me know how it goes :)
> >>>>
> >>>> -Nb
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4/9/06 9:20 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <
conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use
any version of
> >>> rails on
> >>>>> my remote host?  BTW, the remote host is current
running 1.0?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Conrad
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons < pgibbons@initech.lan>
wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Conrad Taylor wrote:
> >>>>>>> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed
''gem cleanup after
> >>>>>>> installing 1.0''?  Also, is it
possible to select a version of rails
> >>> to
> >>>>>>> develop with upon rails project creation?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks in advance,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Conrad
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Try this link.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8
> >>>>>>
> >>> &
> >>>>>> oe=utf-8
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think you''ll be amazed at the advances
search engines made in the
> >>> past
> >>>>>> decade.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If you have trouble with a command, simply enter
it into Google and
> >>> bam!
> >>>>>> You get numerous relevant hits.  Same thing goes
for error messages.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Try it out.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/ .
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Rails mailing list
> >>>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> >>>>>>
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Rails mailing list
> >>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> >>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> >>>>
> >>>>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net
> >>>>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Rails mailing list
> >>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> >>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> >>>
> >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net
> >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Rails mailing list
> >>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> >>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rails mailing list
> > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>

Do it locally and upload the files?

Hmmm...


On 4/10/06 12:41 AM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, thanks for the information.  I don''t have access to any
command
> line on the remote server.  Thus, in you previous e-mail, I cannot
> perform the following:
> 
> BEGIN PREVIOUS TRANSCRIPT:
> 
> For example, on your remote server with 1.0.
> 
> Deploy a frozen edge.
> 
> rails ./
> rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+
> 
> Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use to deploy
> into other directories.
> 
> So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would like.
> 
> rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0
> rails ./
> 
> END PREVIOUS TRANSCRIPT:
> 
> -Conrad
> 
> On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com> wrote:
>> Using the -f (--freeze) uses the vendor, or current deployment for the
rails
>> update.
>> 
>> So if I am in a rails project (which has vendor/rails frozen to edge):
>> 
>> /rails/edge/# rails /path/to/new/project -f
>> 
>> That directory will also get edge version based on the fact that I
deployed
>> it with the -f/--freeze flag. From what I understand, it will only
deploy
>> the rails directory, but you may want to verify this yourself.
>> 
>> I outlined the steps before how to get up to 1.1.2. Re-read my previous
>> emails.
>> 
>> -Nb
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/9/06 10:19 PM, "Conrad Taylor"
<conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hey Nathaniel, I actually would like to deploy a rails 1.1.2 or
later
>>> application to a target (i.e. remote host) that has 1.0 installed. 
Next, I
>>> guess the non-development rails application folder should house the
SVN
>>> updates that are used with later projects. Now, is there an easy
way to when
>>> invoking the rails command to create the application folder to pull
in the
>>> stuff from the template application (i.e. vendor directory)?
>>> 
>>> -Conrad
>>> 
>>> On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>  Hey Nathaniel, thanks for all the information.  After reading
about Edge
>>>> Rails, this simply what I need to do because my host is at 1.0
and I
>>>> simply like to do rails apps that are 1.1+.  Now, I have the
following
>>>> question(s):
>>>> 
>>>> 1)  After installing the edge rails locally on my system, is
there a
>>>> different process for installing
>>>>      the remaining gems?  At this time, my getting started
projects don''t
>>>> use Subversion but it
>>>>      seems that I should start.
>>>> 
>>>> I''ll setup SVN and follow the require steps to get
Edge Rails installed
>>>> for ongoing RoR projects.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks again,
>>>> 
>>>> -Conrad
>>>> 
>>>> On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> A slight modification to this..
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 4/9/06 9:33 PM, "Nathaniel Brown" <
nshb@inimit.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> The TAG option for rake rails:freeze:edge came out with
1.1.0, so you
>>>>> will
>>>>>> need to have at least one package installed with it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You can install into a directory which you
don''t even use other than
>>>>> for
>>>>>> deployment.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> For example, on your remote server with 1.0.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Deploy a frozen edge.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> rails ./
>>>>>> rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you
can use to
>>>>> deploy
>>>>>> into other directories.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So you could use this command to get any tagged release
you would
>>>>> like.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> At this point you would deploy the same version you are
using into the
>>>>> target:
>>>>> 
>>>>> rails /path/to/target/rails --freeze
>>>>> 
>>>>> And now you would downgrade it to 1.0.0
>>>>> 
>>>>> rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0
>>>>> 
>>>>> Would be nice to be able to have a REL tag in the rails
command. I just
>>>>> submitted a enhancement suggestion for this at:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4677
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Nb
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Now, one thing I haven''t tested, would be
whether or not an older
>>>>> version of
>>>>>> Rake will work like this (it should). Only way to know
for sure is to
>>>>> try,
>>>>>> so let me know how it goes :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Nb
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 4/9/06 9:20 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <
conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use
any version of
>>>>> rails on
>>>>>>> my remote host?  BTW, the remote host is current
running 1.0?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -Conrad
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <
pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Conrad Taylor wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed
''gem cleanup after
>>>>>>>>> installing 1.0''?  Also, is it
possible to select a version of rails
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> develop with upon rails project creation?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -Conrad
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Try this link.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>
http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf
>>>>> -8
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> &
>>>>>>>> oe=utf-8
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I think you''ll be amazed at the
advances search engines made in the
>>>>> past
>>>>>>>> decade.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If you have trouble with a command, simply
enter it into Google and
>>>>> bam!
>>>>>>>> You get numerous relevant hits.  Same thing
goes for error messages.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Try it out.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/ .
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Rails mailing list
>>>>>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>>>>>>>>
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Rails mailing list
>>>>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net
>>>>>>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Rails mailing list
>>>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>>>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>>>> 
>>>>>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net
>>>>>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Rails mailing list
>>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rails mailing list
>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>> 
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rails mailing list
>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nathaniel S. H. Brown? ? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?http://nshb.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:
> This release also signals our new commitment to do more tiny releases
> from the stable branch, which only gets bug fixes. So it will not be
> uncommon to see bi-weekly tiny releases in the 1.1.x series while we
> continue to add features to the forthcoming 1.2.0.
Good move!

thanks

   Justin