David Heinemeier Hansson
2006-Apr-09 22:16 UTC
[Rails] [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
The new gem version dependency system from Rails 1.1.1 needed a few tweaks to work properly and to stop throwing meaningless warnings. This tiny release makes up for that. To install: * gem install rails * rake rails:update:configs (to get the latest config/boot.rb) This release also signals our new commitment to do more tiny releases from the stable branch, which only gets bug fixes. So it will not be uncommon to see bi-weekly tiny releases in the 1.1.x series while we continue to add features to the forthcoming 1.2.0. -- David Heinemeier Hansson http://www.loudthinking.com -- Broadcasting Brain http://www.basecamphq.com -- Online project management http://www.backpackit.com -- Personal information manager http://www.rubyonrails.com -- Web-application framework
Peter Gibbons
2006-Apr-09 22:59 UTC
[Rails] Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:> The new gem version dependency system from Rails 1.1.1 needed a few > tweaks to work properly and to stop throwing meaningless warnings. > This tiny release makes up for that. To install: > > * gem install rails > * rake rails:update:configs (to get the latest config/boot.rb) > > This release also signals our new commitment to do more tiny releases > from the stable branch, which only gets bug fixes. So it will not be > uncommon to see bi-weekly tiny releases in the 1.1.x series while we > continue to add features to the forthcoming 1.2.0.Thank you! Sounds like we''ll be getting the best of both worlds (cool new features in 1.2.0 and tiny bugfix releases in 1.1.x). Looks like it is going to be an amazing year for Rails... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Conrad Taylor
2006-Apr-09 23:50 UTC
[Rails] Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
Hi, I received the following when I tried to perform the following command: rake rails:update:configs rake aborted! No Rakefile found (looking for: rakefile, Rakefile, rakefile.rb, Rakefile.rb) /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:1822:in `load_rakefile'' (See full trace by running task with --trace) On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote:> David Heinemeier Hansson wrote: > > The new gem version dependency system from Rails 1.1.1 needed a few > > tweaks to work properly and to stop throwing meaningless warnings. > > This tiny release makes up for that. To install: > > > > * gem install rails > > * rake rails:update:configs (to get the latest config/boot.rb) > > > > This release also signals our new commitment to do more tiny releases > > from the stable branch, which only gets bug fixes. So it will not be > > uncommon to see bi-weekly tiny releases in the 1.1.x series while we > > continue to add features to the forthcoming 1.2.0. > > Thank you! Sounds like we''ll be getting the best of both worlds (cool > new features in 1.2.0 and tiny bugfix releases in 1.1.x). > > Looks like it is going to be an amazing year for Rails... > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >
Belorion
2006-Apr-09 23:56 UTC
[Rails] Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:> > Hi, I received the following when I tried to perform the following > command: > > rake rails:update:configs > rake aborted! > No Rakefile found (looking for: rakefile, Rakefile, rakefile.rb, > Rakefile.rb) > /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:1822:in > `load_rakefile'' > (See full trace by running task with --trace) >Hi Conrad. Make sure you are in the root directory of your relevant rails applications when you run that second command. -Matt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060409/c24d1b31/attachment.html
Conrad Taylor
2006-Apr-09 23:58 UTC
[Rails] Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
How many versions of rails can one install at a time? I''m needing to use 1.0 because the hosting account is using ths version. Also, I would like to experiment with the new features. Thanks in advance, -Conrad On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi, I received the following when I tried to perform the following command: > > rake rails:update:configs > rake aborted! > No Rakefile found (looking for: rakefile, Rakefile, rakefile.rb, Rakefile.rb) > /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:1822:in `load_rakefile'' > (See full trace by running task with --trace) > > > On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote: > > David Heinemeier Hansson wrote: > > > The new gem version dependency system from Rails 1.1.1 needed a few > > > tweaks to work properly and to stop throwing meaningless warnings. > > > This tiny release makes up for that. To install: > > > > > > * gem install rails > > > * rake rails:update:configs (to get the latest config/boot.rb) > > > > > > This release also signals our new commitment to do more tiny releases > > > from the stable branch, which only gets bug fixes. So it will not be > > > uncommon to see bi-weekly tiny releases in the 1.1.x series while we > > > continue to add features to the forthcoming 1.2.0. > > > > Thank you! Sounds like we''ll be getting the best of both worlds (cool > > new features in 1.2.0 and tiny bugfix releases in 1.1.x). > > > > Looks like it is going to be an amazing year for Rails... > > > > -- > > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails mailing list > > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > >
Nathaniel Brown
2006-Apr-10 00:36 UTC
[Rails] Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
You can use the: rake rails:freeze:edge TAG=rel_1-0-0 Which will deploy 1.0.0 on that rails app. -Nb On 4/9/06 4:58 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:> How many versions of rails can one install at a time? I''m needing to > use 1.0 because the hosting account is using ths version. Also, I > would like to experiment with the new features. > > Thanks in advance, > > -Conrad > > On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, I received the following when I tried to perform the following command: >> >> rake rails:update:configs >> rake aborted! >> No Rakefile found (looking for: rakefile, Rakefile, rakefile.rb, Rakefile.rb) >> /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:1822:in >> `load_rakefile'' >> (See full trace by running task with --trace) >> >> >> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote: >>> David Heinemeier Hansson wrote: >>>> The new gem version dependency system from Rails 1.1.1 needed a few >>>> tweaks to work properly and to stop throwing meaningless warnings. >>>> This tiny release makes up for that. To install: >>>> >>>> * gem install rails >>>> * rake rails:update:configs (to get the latest config/boot.rb) >>>> >>>> This release also signals our new commitment to do more tiny releases >>>> from the stable branch, which only gets bug fixes. So it will not be >>>> uncommon to see bi-weekly tiny releases in the 1.1.x series while we >>>> continue to add features to the forthcoming 1.2.0. >>> >>> Thank you! Sounds like we''ll be getting the best of both worlds (cool >>> new features in 1.2.0 and tiny bugfix releases in 1.1.x). >>> >>> Looks like it is going to be an amazing year for Rails... >>> >>> -- >>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Rails mailing list >>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nathaniel S. H. Brown? ? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?http://nshb.net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conrad Taylor
2006-Apr-10 01:05 UTC
[Rails] Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem cleanup after installing 1.0''? Also, is it possible to select a version of rails to develop with upon rails project creation? Thanks in advance, -Conrad On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com> wrote:> You can use the: > > rake rails:freeze:edge TAG=rel_1-0-0 > > Which will deploy 1.0.0 on that rails app. > > -Nb > > > On 4/9/06 4:58 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote: > > > How many versions of rails can one install at a time? I''m needing to > > use 1.0 because the hosting account is using ths version. Also, I > > would like to experiment with the new features. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > -Conrad > > > > On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, I received the following when I tried to perform the following command: > >> > >> rake rails:update:configs > >> rake aborted! > >> No Rakefile found (looking for: rakefile, Rakefile, rakefile.rb, Rakefile.rb) > >> /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:1822:in > >> `load_rakefile'' > >> (See full trace by running task with --trace) > >> > >> > >> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote: > >>> David Heinemeier Hansson wrote: > >>>> The new gem version dependency system from Rails 1.1.1 needed a few > >>>> tweaks to work properly and to stop throwing meaningless warnings. > >>>> This tiny release makes up for that. To install: > >>>> > >>>> * gem install rails > >>>> * rake rails:update:configs (to get the latest config/boot.rb) > >>>> > >>>> This release also signals our new commitment to do more tiny releases > >>>> from the stable branch, which only gets bug fixes. So it will not be > >>>> uncommon to see bi-weekly tiny releases in the 1.1.x series while we > >>>> continue to add features to the forthcoming 1.2.0. > >>> > >>> Thank you! Sounds like we''ll be getting the best of both worlds (cool > >>> new features in 1.2.0 and tiny bugfix releases in 1.1.x). > >>> > >>> Looks like it is going to be an amazing year for Rails... > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Rails mailing list > >>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > >>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > >>> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails mailing list > > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >
Peter Gibbons
2006-Apr-10 01:49 UTC
[Rails] Re: Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
Conrad Taylor wrote:> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem cleanup after > installing 1.0''? Also, is it possible to select a version of rails to > develop with upon rails project creation? > > Thanks in advance, > > -ConradTry this link. http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search engines made in the past decade. If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into Google and bam! You get numerous relevant hits. Same thing goes for error messages. Try it out. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Conrad Taylor
2006-Apr-10 04:20 UTC
[Rails] Re: Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use any version of rails on my remote host? BTW, the remote host is current running 1.0? -Conrad On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote:> > Conrad Taylor wrote: > > Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem cleanup after > > installing 1.0''? Also, is it possible to select a version of rails to > > develop with upon rails project creation? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > -Conrad > > Try this link. > > > http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 > > I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search engines made in the past > decade. > > If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into Google and bam! > You get numerous relevant hits. Same thing goes for error messages. > > Try it out. > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060410/fc83a586/attachment.html
Nathaniel Brown
2006-Apr-10 04:33 UTC
[Rails] Re: Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
The TAG option for rake rails:freeze:edge came out with 1.1.0, so you will need to have at least one package installed with it. You can install into a directory which you don''t even use other than for deployment. For example, on your remote server with 1.0. Deploy a frozen edge. rails ./ rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+ Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use to deploy into other directories. So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would like. rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0 rails ./ Now, one thing I haven''t tested, would be whether or not an older version of Rake will work like this (it should). Only way to know for sure is to try, so let me know how it goes :) -Nb On 4/9/06 9:20 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:> So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use any version of rails on > my remote host? BTW, the remote host is current running 1.0? > > -Conrad > > On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote: >> >> Conrad Taylor wrote: >>> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem cleanup after >>> installing 1.0''? Also, is it possible to select a version of rails to >>> develop with upon rails project creation? >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> >>> -Conrad >> >> Try this link. >> >> >> http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8& >> oe=utf-8 >> >> I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search engines made in the past >> decade. >> >> If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into Google and bam! >> You get numerous relevant hits. Same thing goes for error messages. >> >> Try it out. >> >> -- >> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails mailing list >> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >> > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nathaniel S. H. Brown? ? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?http://nshb.net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nathaniel Brown
2006-Apr-10 04:44 UTC
[Rails] Re: Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
A slight modification to this.. On 4/9/06 9:33 PM, "Nathaniel Brown" <nshb@inimit.com> wrote:> The TAG option for rake rails:freeze:edge came out with 1.1.0, so you will > need to have at least one package installed with it. > > You can install into a directory which you don''t even use other than for > deployment. > > For example, on your remote server with 1.0. > > Deploy a frozen edge. > > rails ./ > rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+ > > Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use to deploy > into other directories. > > So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would like. >At this point you would deploy the same version you are using into the target: rails /path/to/target/rails --freeze And now you would downgrade it to 1.0.0 rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0 Would be nice to be able to have a REL tag in the rails command. I just submitted a enhancement suggestion for this at: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4677 -Nb> > Now, one thing I haven''t tested, would be whether or not an older version of > Rake will work like this (it should). Only way to know for sure is to try, > so let me know how it goes :) > > -Nb > > On 4/9/06 9:20 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use any version of rails on >> my remote host? BTW, the remote host is current running 1.0? >> >> -Conrad >> >> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote: >>> >>> Conrad Taylor wrote: >>>> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem cleanup after >>>> installing 1.0''? Also, is it possible to select a version of rails to >>>> develop with upon rails project creation? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance, >>>> >>>> -Conrad >>> >>> Try this link. >>> >>> >>>http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8>>> &>>> oe=utf-8 >>> >>> I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search engines made in the past >>> decade. >>> >>> If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into Google and bam! >>> You get numerous relevant hits. Same thing goes for error messages. >>> >>> Try it out. >>> >>> -- >>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Rails mailing list >>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails mailing list >> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Nathaniel S. H. Brown? ? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?http://nshb.net > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nathaniel S. H. Brown? ? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?http://nshb.net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conrad Taylor
2006-Apr-10 05:13 UTC
[Rails] Re: Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
Hey Nathaniel, thanks for all the information. After reading about Edge Rails, this simply what I need to do because my host is at 1.0 and I simply like to do rails apps that are 1.1+. Now, I have the following question(s): 1) After installing the edge rails locally on my system, is there a different process for installing the remaining gems? At this time, my getting started projects don''t use Subversion but it seems that I should start. I''ll setup SVN and follow the require steps to get Edge Rails installed for ongoing RoR projects. Thanks again, -Conrad On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com> wrote:> > A slight modification to this.. > > > On 4/9/06 9:33 PM, "Nathaniel Brown" < nshb@inimit.com> wrote: > > > The TAG option for rake rails:freeze:edge came out with 1.1.0, so you > will > > need to have at least one package installed with it. > > > > You can install into a directory which you don''t even use other than for > > > deployment. > > > > For example, on your remote server with 1.0. > > > > Deploy a frozen edge. > > > > rails ./ > > rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+ > > > > Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use to > deploy > > into other directories. > > > > So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would like. > > > > At this point you would deploy the same version you are using into the > target: > > rails /path/to/target/rails --freeze > > And now you would downgrade it to 1.0.0 > > rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0 > > Would be nice to be able to have a REL tag in the rails command. I just > submitted a enhancement suggestion for this at: > > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4677 > > -Nb > > > > > Now, one thing I haven''t tested, would be whether or not an older > version of > > Rake will work like this (it should). Only way to know for sure is to > try, > > so let me know how it goes :) > > > > -Nb > > > > On 4/9/06 9:20 PM, "Conrad Taylor" < conradwt@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use any version of > rails on > >> my remote host? BTW, the remote host is current running 1.0? > >> > >> -Conrad > >> > >> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons <pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote: > >>> > >>> Conrad Taylor wrote: > >>>> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem cleanup after > >>>> installing 1.0''? Also, is it possible to select a version of rails > to > >>>> develop with upon rails project creation? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks in advance, > >>>> > >>>> -Conrad > >>> > >>> Try this link. > >>> > >>> > >>> > > http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8 > >>> > & > >>> oe=utf-8 > >>> > >>> I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search engines made in the > past > >>> decade. > >>> > >>> If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into Google and > bam! > >>> You get numerous relevant hits. Same thing goes for error messages. > >>> > >>> Try it out. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Rails mailing list > >>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > >>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Rails mailing list > >> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > >> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails mailing list > > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060410/3d4f4551/attachment-0001.html
Conrad Taylor
2006-Apr-10 05:19 UTC
[Rails] Re: Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
Hey Nathaniel, I actually would like to deploy a rails 1.1.2 or later application to a target (i.e. remote host) that has 1.0 installed. Next, I guess the non-development rails application folder should house the SVN updates that are used with later projects. Now, is there an easy way to when invoking the rails command to create the application folder to pull in the stuff from the template application (i.e. vendor directory)? -Conrad On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:> > Hey Nathaniel, thanks for all the information. After reading about Edge > Rails, this simply what I need to do because my host is at 1.0 and I > simply like to do rails apps that are 1.1+. Now, I have the following > question(s): > > 1) After installing the edge rails locally on my system, is there a > different process for installing > the remaining gems? At this time, my getting started projects don''t > use Subversion but it > seems that I should start. > > I''ll setup SVN and follow the require steps to get Edge Rails installed > for ongoing RoR projects. > > Thanks again, > > -Conrad > > On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com> wrote: > > > > A slight modification to this.. > > > > > > On 4/9/06 9:33 PM, "Nathaniel Brown" < nshb@inimit.com> wrote: > > > > > The TAG option for rake rails:freeze:edge came out with 1.1.0, so you > > will > > > need to have at least one package installed with it. > > > > > > You can install into a directory which you don''t even use other than > > for > > > deployment. > > > > > > For example, on your remote server with 1.0. > > > > > > Deploy a frozen edge. > > > > > > rails ./ > > > rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+ > > > > > > Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use to > > deploy > > > into other directories. > > > > > > So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would > > like. > > > > > > > At this point you would deploy the same version you are using into the > > target: > > > > rails /path/to/target/rails --freeze > > > > And now you would downgrade it to 1.0.0 > > > > rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0 > > > > Would be nice to be able to have a REL tag in the rails command. I just > > submitted a enhancement suggestion for this at: > > > > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4677 > > > > -Nb > > > > > > > > Now, one thing I haven''t tested, would be whether or not an older > > version of > > > Rake will work like this (it should). Only way to know for sure is to > > try, > > > so let me know how it goes :) > > > > > > -Nb > > > > > > On 4/9/06 9:20 PM, "Conrad Taylor" < conradwt@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use any version of > > rails on > > >> my remote host? BTW, the remote host is current running 1.0? > > >> > > >> -Conrad > > >> > > >> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons < pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Conrad Taylor wrote: > > >>>> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem cleanup after > > >>>> installing 1.0''? Also, is it possible to select a version of rails > > to > > >>>> develop with upon rails project creation? > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks in advance, > > >>>> > > >>>> -Conrad > > >>> > > >>> Try this link. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > > http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8 > > >>> > > & > > >>> oe=utf-8 > > >>> > > >>> I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search engines made in the > > past > > >>> decade. > > >>> > > >>> If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into Google and > > bam! > > >>> You get numerous relevant hits. Same thing goes for error messages. > > >>> > > >>> Try it out. > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/ . > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> Rails mailing list > > >>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > > >>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > >>> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Rails mailing list > > >> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > > >> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Rails mailing list > > > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > > > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails mailing list > > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060410/dd221b3b/attachment.html
Nathaniel Brown
2006-Apr-10 05:34 UTC
[Rails] Re: Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
Using the -f (--freeze) uses the vendor, or current deployment for the rails update. So if I am in a rails project (which has vendor/rails frozen to edge): /rails/edge/# rails /path/to/new/project -f That directory will also get edge version based on the fact that I deployed it with the -f/--freeze flag. From what I understand, it will only deploy the rails directory, but you may want to verify this yourself. I outlined the steps before how to get up to 1.1.2. Re-read my previous emails. -Nb On 4/9/06 10:19 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:> Hey Nathaniel, I actually would like to deploy a rails 1.1.2 or later > application to a target (i.e. remote host) that has 1.0 installed. Next, I > guess the non-development rails application folder should house the SVN > updates that are used with later projects. Now, is there an easy way to when > invoking the rails command to create the application folder to pull in the > stuff from the template application (i.e. vendor directory)? > > -Conrad > > On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hey Nathaniel, thanks for all the information. After reading about Edge >> Rails, this simply what I need to do because my host is at 1.0 and I >> simply like to do rails apps that are 1.1+. Now, I have the following >> question(s): >> >> 1) After installing the edge rails locally on my system, is there a >> different process for installing >> the remaining gems? At this time, my getting started projects don''t >> use Subversion but it >> seems that I should start. >> >> I''ll setup SVN and follow the require steps to get Edge Rails installed >> for ongoing RoR projects. >> >> Thanks again, >> >> -Conrad >> >> On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com> wrote: >>> >>> A slight modification to this.. >>> >>> >>> On 4/9/06 9:33 PM, "Nathaniel Brown" < nshb@inimit.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The TAG option for rake rails:freeze:edge came out with 1.1.0, so you >>> will >>>> need to have at least one package installed with it. >>>> >>>> You can install into a directory which you don''t even use other than >>> for >>>> deployment. >>>> >>>> For example, on your remote server with 1.0. >>>> >>>> Deploy a frozen edge. >>>> >>>> rails ./ >>>> rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+ >>>> >>>> Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use to >>> deploy >>>> into other directories. >>>> >>>> So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would >>> like. >>>> >>> >>> At this point you would deploy the same version you are using into the >>> target: >>> >>> rails /path/to/target/rails --freeze >>> >>> And now you would downgrade it to 1.0.0 >>> >>> rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0 >>> >>> Would be nice to be able to have a REL tag in the rails command. I just >>> submitted a enhancement suggestion for this at: >>> >>> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4677 >>> >>> -Nb >>> >>>> >>>> Now, one thing I haven''t tested, would be whether or not an older >>> version of >>>> Rake will work like this (it should). Only way to know for sure is to >>> try, >>>> so let me know how it goes :) >>>> >>>> -Nb >>>> >>>> On 4/9/06 9:20 PM, "Conrad Taylor" < conradwt@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use any version of >>> rails on >>>>> my remote host? BTW, the remote host is current running 1.0? >>>>> >>>>> -Conrad >>>>> >>>>> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons < pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Conrad Taylor wrote: >>>>>>> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem cleanup after >>>>>>> installing 1.0''? Also, is it possible to select a version of rails >>> to >>>>>>> develop with upon rails project creation? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Conrad >>>>>> >>>>>> Try this link. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8 >>>>>> >>> & >>>>>> oe=utf-8 >>>>>> >>>>>> I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search engines made in the >>> past >>>>>> decade. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into Google and >>> bam! >>>>>> You get numerous relevant hits. Same thing goes for error messages. >>>>>> >>>>>> Try it out. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/ . >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Rails mailing list >>>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >>>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Rails mailing list >>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >>>> >>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net >>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Rails mailing list >>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >>> >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Rails mailing list >>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nathaniel S. H. Brown? ? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?http://nshb.net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conrad Taylor
2006-Apr-10 07:41 UTC
[Rails] Re: Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
Hi, thanks for the information. I don''t have access to any command line on the remote server. Thus, in you previous e-mail, I cannot perform the following: BEGIN PREVIOUS TRANSCRIPT: For example, on your remote server with 1.0. Deploy a frozen edge. rails ./ rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+ Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use to deploy into other directories. So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would like. rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0 rails ./ END PREVIOUS TRANSCRIPT: -Conrad On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com> wrote:> Using the -f (--freeze) uses the vendor, or current deployment for the rails > update. > > So if I am in a rails project (which has vendor/rails frozen to edge): > > /rails/edge/# rails /path/to/new/project -f > > That directory will also get edge version based on the fact that I deployed > it with the -f/--freeze flag. From what I understand, it will only deploy > the rails directory, but you may want to verify this yourself. > > I outlined the steps before how to get up to 1.1.2. Re-read my previous > emails. > > -Nb > > > On 4/9/06 10:19 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey Nathaniel, I actually would like to deploy a rails 1.1.2 or later > > application to a target (i.e. remote host) that has 1.0 installed. Next, I > > guess the non-development rails application folder should house the SVN > > updates that are used with later projects. Now, is there an easy way to when > > invoking the rails command to create the application folder to pull in the > > stuff from the template application (i.e. vendor directory)? > > > > -Conrad > > > > On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hey Nathaniel, thanks for all the information. After reading about Edge > >> Rails, this simply what I need to do because my host is at 1.0 and I > >> simply like to do rails apps that are 1.1+. Now, I have the following > >> question(s): > >> > >> 1) After installing the edge rails locally on my system, is there a > >> different process for installing > >> the remaining gems? At this time, my getting started projects don''t > >> use Subversion but it > >> seems that I should start. > >> > >> I''ll setup SVN and follow the require steps to get Edge Rails installed > >> for ongoing RoR projects. > >> > >> Thanks again, > >> > >> -Conrad > >> > >> On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> A slight modification to this.. > >>> > >>> > >>> On 4/9/06 9:33 PM, "Nathaniel Brown" < nshb@inimit.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> The TAG option for rake rails:freeze:edge came out with 1.1.0, so you > >>> will > >>>> need to have at least one package installed with it. > >>>> > >>>> You can install into a directory which you don''t even use other than > >>> for > >>>> deployment. > >>>> > >>>> For example, on your remote server with 1.0. > >>>> > >>>> Deploy a frozen edge. > >>>> > >>>> rails ./ > >>>> rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+ > >>>> > >>>> Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use to > >>> deploy > >>>> into other directories. > >>>> > >>>> So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would > >>> like. > >>>> > >>> > >>> At this point you would deploy the same version you are using into the > >>> target: > >>> > >>> rails /path/to/target/rails --freeze > >>> > >>> And now you would downgrade it to 1.0.0 > >>> > >>> rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0 > >>> > >>> Would be nice to be able to have a REL tag in the rails command. I just > >>> submitted a enhancement suggestion for this at: > >>> > >>> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4677 > >>> > >>> -Nb > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Now, one thing I haven''t tested, would be whether or not an older > >>> version of > >>>> Rake will work like this (it should). Only way to know for sure is to > >>> try, > >>>> so let me know how it goes :) > >>>> > >>>> -Nb > >>>> > >>>> On 4/9/06 9:20 PM, "Conrad Taylor" < conradwt@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use any version of > >>> rails on > >>>>> my remote host? BTW, the remote host is current running 1.0? > >>>>> > >>>>> -Conrad > >>>>> > >>>>> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons < pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Conrad Taylor wrote: > >>>>>>> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem cleanup after > >>>>>>> installing 1.0''? Also, is it possible to select a version of rails > >>> to > >>>>>>> develop with upon rails project creation? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks in advance, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -Conrad > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Try this link. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>> http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf-8 > >>>>>> > >>> & > >>>>>> oe=utf-8 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search engines made in the > >>> past > >>>>>> decade. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into Google and > >>> bam! > >>>>>> You get numerous relevant hits. Same thing goes for error messages. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Try it out. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/ . > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> Rails mailing list > >>>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > >>>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > >>>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Rails mailing list > >>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > >>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > >>>> > >>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >>>> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net > >>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Rails mailing list > >>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > >>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > >>> > >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >>> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net > >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Rails mailing list > >>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > >>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > >>> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails mailing list > > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >
Nathaniel Brown
2006-Apr-10 10:20 UTC
[Rails] Re: Re: [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
Do it locally and upload the files? Hmmm... On 4/10/06 12:41 AM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi, thanks for the information. I don''t have access to any command > line on the remote server. Thus, in you previous e-mail, I cannot > perform the following: > > BEGIN PREVIOUS TRANSCRIPT: > > For example, on your remote server with 1.0. > > Deploy a frozen edge. > > rails ./ > rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+ > > Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use to deploy > into other directories. > > So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would like. > > rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0 > rails ./ > > END PREVIOUS TRANSCRIPT: > > -Conrad > > On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com> wrote: >> Using the -f (--freeze) uses the vendor, or current deployment for the rails >> update. >> >> So if I am in a rails project (which has vendor/rails frozen to edge): >> >> /rails/edge/# rails /path/to/new/project -f >> >> That directory will also get edge version based on the fact that I deployed >> it with the -f/--freeze flag. From what I understand, it will only deploy >> the rails directory, but you may want to verify this yourself. >> >> I outlined the steps before how to get up to 1.1.2. Re-read my previous >> emails. >> >> -Nb >> >> >> On 4/9/06 10:19 PM, "Conrad Taylor" <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey Nathaniel, I actually would like to deploy a rails 1.1.2 or later >>> application to a target (i.e. remote host) that has 1.0 installed. Next, I >>> guess the non-development rails application folder should house the SVN >>> updates that are used with later projects. Now, is there an easy way to when >>> invoking the rails command to create the application folder to pull in the >>> stuff from the template application (i.e. vendor directory)? >>> >>> -Conrad >>> >>> On 4/9/06, Conrad Taylor <conradwt@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey Nathaniel, thanks for all the information. After reading about Edge >>>> Rails, this simply what I need to do because my host is at 1.0 and I >>>> simply like to do rails apps that are 1.1+. Now, I have the following >>>> question(s): >>>> >>>> 1) After installing the edge rails locally on my system, is there a >>>> different process for installing >>>> the remaining gems? At this time, my getting started projects don''t >>>> use Subversion but it >>>> seems that I should start. >>>> >>>> I''ll setup SVN and follow the require steps to get Edge Rails installed >>>> for ongoing RoR projects. >>>> >>>> Thanks again, >>>> >>>> -Conrad >>>> >>>> On 4/9/06, Nathaniel Brown <nshb@inimit.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> A slight modification to this.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 4/9/06 9:33 PM, "Nathaniel Brown" < nshb@inimit.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The TAG option for rake rails:freeze:edge came out with 1.1.0, so you >>>>> will >>>>>> need to have at least one package installed with it. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can install into a directory which you don''t even use other than >>>>> for >>>>>> deployment. >>>>>> >>>>>> For example, on your remote server with 1.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> Deploy a frozen edge. >>>>>> >>>>>> rails ./ >>>>>> rake freeze_edge # This should bring you up to 1.1.0+ >>>>>> >>>>>> Now you will have access to 1.1.0 rake tasks, which you can use to >>>>> deploy >>>>>> into other directories. >>>>>> >>>>>> So you could use this command to get any tagged release you would >>>>> like. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> At this point you would deploy the same version you are using into the >>>>> target: >>>>> >>>>> rails /path/to/target/rails --freeze >>>>> >>>>> And now you would downgrade it to 1.0.0 >>>>> >>>>> rake rails:freeze:edge REL=rel_1-0-0 >>>>> >>>>> Would be nice to be able to have a REL tag in the rails command. I just >>>>> submitted a enhancement suggestion for this at: >>>>> >>>>> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4677 >>>>> >>>>> -Nb >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Now, one thing I haven''t tested, would be whether or not an older >>>>> version of >>>>>> Rake will work like this (it should). Only way to know for sure is to >>>>> try, >>>>>> so let me know how it goes :) >>>>>> >>>>>> -Nb >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4/9/06 9:20 PM, "Conrad Taylor" < conradwt@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> So, switching to edge rails locally allow me to use any version of >>>>> rails on >>>>>>> my remote host? BTW, the remote host is current running 1.0? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Conrad >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/9/06, Peter Gibbons < pgibbons@initech.lan> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Conrad Taylor wrote: >>>>>>>>> Should I reinstall 1.0 because I performed ''gem cleanup after >>>>>>>>> installing 1.0''? Also, is it possible to select a version of rails >>>>> to >>>>>>>>> develop with upon rails project creation? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Conrad >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Try this link. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=freeze_edge+rails:freeze:edge&ie=utf >>>>> -8 >>>>>>>> >>>>> & >>>>>>>> oe=utf-8 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think you''ll be amazed at the advances search engines made in the >>>>> past >>>>>>>> decade. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you have trouble with a command, simply enter it into Google and >>>>> bam! >>>>>>>> You get numerous relevant hits. Same thing goes for error messages. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Try it out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/ . >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Rails mailing list >>>>>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Rails mailing list >>>>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >>>>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >>>>>> >>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>>>> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net >>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Rails mailing list >>>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >>>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >>>>> >>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>>> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net >>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Rails mailing list >>>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >>>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Rails mailing list >>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> Nathaniel S. H. Brown http://nshb.net >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails mailing list >> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >> > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nathaniel S. H. Brown? ? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?http://nshb.net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Justin Forder
2006-Apr-10 23:45 UTC
[Rails] [ANN] Rails 1.1.2: A tiny fix for gem dependencies
David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:> This release also signals our new commitment to do more tiny releases > from the stable branch, which only gets bug fixes. So it will not be > uncommon to see bi-weekly tiny releases in the 1.1.x series while we > continue to add features to the forthcoming 1.2.0.Good move! thanks Justin