Rails - Apr 2006 - typo 2.6.0 with vendor/rails

I noticed that the 2.6.0 Typo with vendor/rails has only migration  
scripts numbered 1 to 9, while the tagged branch of 2.6.0 Typo has  
migrations numbered 0 to 24. I haven''t seen any notes about this.  
Anyone know what''s up?

Might have something to do with the switch to BareMigrations that was done
post-2.6.0.  Try asking on the Typo list.

On 4/3/06, Jamie Orchard-Hays <jamie@dang.com>
wrote:
>
> I noticed that the 2.6.0 Typo with vendor/rails has only migration
> scripts numbered 1 to 9, while the tagged branch of 2.6.0 Typo has
> migrations numbered 0 to 24. I haven''t seen any notes about this.
> Anyone know what''s up?
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060404/aa408a9d/attachment.html

Jamie Orchard-Hays <jamie@dang.com> writes:
> I noticed that the 2.6.0 Typo with vendor/rails has only migration
> scripts numbered 1 to 9, while the tagged branch of 2.6.0 Typo has
> migrations numbered 0 to 24. I haven''t seen any notes about this.
> Anyone know what''s up?
The tagged branch is not the distribution. No, I don''t know why.

-- 
Piers Cawley <pdcawley@bofh.org.uk>
http://www.bofh.org.uk/