Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
--
-- Tom Mornini
On Jan 25, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Steve Lloyd wrote:
> I''ve got a number of fixtures which populate
''authority'' tables in an
> app (eg tables which are used to construct the values of selects or
> valid ''constants''). These will be updated infrequently
and are
> ''configuration'' data, so I''m not sure its worth
constructing an
> interface to do this in the deployed app.
> Seeing as migrations can execute arbitrary code, I had thought of
> adding
> one to populate these authority tables-any thoughts on this approach?
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails