Hi, Am I right in thinking that cloning an ActiveRecord does not close its associations? If so, any particluar reason for this? Jeroen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 10, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Jeroen Houben wrote:> Am I right in thinking that cloning an ActiveRecord does not close > its associations? If so, any particluar reason for this?Because how deep you go in the object graph is application-specific. jeremy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDc7XSAQHALep9HFYRApnBAJwNP7C1rsbS+LZ7SV2TCgsNz3c+eQCgjtk/ bV5tQhZrm9GW7g//HfllpNI=9w0M -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Jeremy Kemper wrote:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Nov 10, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Jeroen Houben wrote: > >> Am I right in thinking that cloning an ActiveRecord does not close >> its associations? If so, any particluar reason for this? > > > Because how deep you go in the object graph is application-specific.Okay. Makes sense. Perhaps this can be added to the API docs. Thanks for your help! Jeroen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 10, 2005, at 1:22 PM, Jeroen Houben wrote:> Jeremy Kemper wrote: >> On Nov 10, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Jeroen Houben wrote: >>> Am I right in thinking that cloning an ActiveRecord does not >>> close its associations? If so, any particluar reason for this? >> >> Because how deep you go in the object graph is application-specific. > > Okay. Makes sense. Perhaps this can be added to the API docs.Sure: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/2975 jeremy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDc76OAQHALep9HFYRAnLUAKCImfKrN48GHV8qb3oBPo6d4MgJ+QCeNFKp /Ar7DUAkGf5R2QF+WyHW7MA=eReL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----