Admit it, Rolf. Haven't you wondered if S, in a more private way, is sexier
than R?
OK, kidding aside, we have talked this to death.
Just FYI, the conversation was stimulating for some of us and I have continued
on my own and located functions I see as useful in the stringi and stringr
packages to make my silly version ever less silly! LOL!
-----Original Message-----
From: Rolf Turner <rolfturner at posteo.net>
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2024 10:11 PM
To: CALUM POLWART <polc1410 at gmail.com>
Cc: avi.e.gross at gmail.com; Lennart Kasserra <lennart.kasserra at
gmail.com>; r-help at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Is there a sexy way ...?
On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 10:26:31 +0100
CALUM POLWART <polc1410 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Avi
>
> I fear this was all a huge social experiment.
>
> Testing if a post titled "sexy way" would increase engagement...
<SNIP>
I conjecture that this conjecture was tongue-in-cheek. Be that as it
were ??, let me assure everyone that such was not my intention. The
usage is just my manner of speaking.
cheers,
Rolf
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone:
+64-9-373-7599 ext. 89622
Home phone: +64-9-480-4619