search for: sexi

Admit it, Rolf. Haven't you wondered if S, in a more private way, is sexier than R? OK, kidding aside, we have talked this to death. Just FYI, the conversation was stimulating for some of us and I have continued on my own and located functions I see as useful in the stringi and stringr packages to make my silly version ever less silly! LOL! -----Original Message-----...

On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 10:26:31 +0100 CALUM POLWART <polc1410 at gmail.com> wrote: > Avi > > I fear this was all a huge social experiment. > > Testing if a post titled "sexy way" would increase engagement... <SNIP> I conjecture that this conjecture was tongue-in-cheek. Be that as it were ??, let me assure everyone that such was not my intention. The usage

...ector v of length 15 such that the entries of v, corresponding to level l of f are the entries of x[[l]]. I.e. I want v to equal c(7, 2, 6, 13, 5, 9, 1, 14, 15, 4, 8, 12, 10, 11, 3) I can create v "easily enough", using say, a for-loop. It seems to me, though, that there should be sexier (single command) way of achieving the desired result. However I cannot devise one. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks. cheers, Rolf Turner -- Honorary Research Fellow Department of Statistics University of Auckland Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone: +64-9-373-75...

Avi I fear this was all a huge social experiment. Testing if a post titled "sexy way" would increase engagement... On Sat, 28 Sep 2024, 07:21 , <avi.e.gross at gmail.com> wrote: > I see a book coming: > "666 ways to do the same thing in R ranked by sexiness." > > Kidding aside, if you look under the covers of some of the functions we > are using, we may find we are taking steps back as some of them use others > and perhaps more functionality than we need. > > But for a new reader , looking at many approaches may open up othe...

...ector v of length 15 such that the entries of v, corresponding to level l of f are the entries of x[[l]]. I.e. I want v to equal c(7, 2, 6, 13, 5, 9, 1, 14, 15, 4, 8, 12, 10, 11, 3) I can create v "easily enough", using say, a for-loop. It seems to me, though, that there should be sexier (single command) way of achieving the desired result. However I cannot devise one. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks. cheers, Rolf Turner -- Honorary Research Fellow Department of Statistics University of Auckland Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone: +64-9-373-7...

...ll a huge social experiment. Testing if a post titled "sexy way" would increase engagement... On Sat, 28 Sep 2024, 07:21 , <avi.e.gross at gmail.com <mailto:avi.e.gross at gmail.com> > wrote: I see a book coming: "666 ways to do the same thing in R ranked by sexiness." Kidding aside, if you look under the covers of some of the functions we are using, we may find we are taking steps back as some of them use others and perhaps more functionality than we need. But for a new reader , looking at many approaches may open up other ways and ideas and see the...

Suppose I have a data frame with two columns ``district'' and ``score'' --- score is numeric; district may be considered categorical. I wish to append to this data frame a third column whose entries are the ranks of ``score'' ***within*** district. I've tried fiddling about with tapply() and by() but the result is a list whose i-th component consists of the ranks of

I see a book coming: "666 ways to do the same thing in R ranked by sexiness." Kidding aside, if you look under the covers of some of the functions we are using, we may find we are taking steps back as some of them use others and perhaps more functionality than we need. But for a new reader , looking at many approaches may open up other ways and ideas and see the...

...].? I.e. I want >>> v to equal >>> >>> ???? c(7, 2, 6, 13, 5, 9, 1, 14, 15, 4, 8, 12, 10, 11, 3) >>> >>> I can create v "easily enough", using say, a for-loop.? It seems to me, >>> though, that there should be sexier (single command) way of achieving >>> the desired result.? However I cannot devise one. >>> >> >> Don't you find a for loop's naked display of intention to be sexy? >> >> Duncan Murdoch >> > -- &gt...

On 2024-09-28 13:57, avi.e.gross at gmail.com wrote: > Python users often ask if a solution is ?pythonic?. But I am not aware > of R users having any special name like ?R-thritic? and that may be a > good thing.

Ok, I give up: what's that supposed to look like? I tried to replace makeNstr with paste(rep(..)) but got garbage. (my own fault: I still like 10.3.9, so can't install a new enough version of R to install the Hmisc package) Carl

Norton AntiVirus found a virus in an attachment you (samba) sent to tlydon@feeplan.com. To ensure the recipient(s) are able to use the files you sent, perform a virus scan on your computer, clean any infected files, then resend this attachment. Attachment: target.bat Virus name: W32.Klez.H@mm Action taken: Clean failed : Quarantine succeeded : File status: Infected -------------- next

...y one might argue > that it is superfluous to bring in an extra library for this. I think > Bert's solution ( > `c(do.call(rbind, x))`) is great if `f` has no substantive meaning, > and Deepayan's solution (`unsplit(x, f)`) is perfect in case it does - > does not get much sexier than that, I am afraid. > > Best, > > Lennart > > > Am 27.09.24 um 05:55 schrieb Rolf Turner: >> I have (toy example): >> >> x <- list(`1` = c(7, 13, 1, 4, 10), >> ?????????? `2` = c(2, 5,? 14, 8, 11), >> ?????????? `3` = c(6, 9, 15, 12, 3)) &...

...ector v of length 15 such that the entries of v, corresponding to level l of f are the entries of x[[l]]. I.e. I want v to equal c(7, 2, 6, 13, 5, 9, 1, 14, 15, 4, 8, 12, 10, 11, 3) I can create v "easily enough", using say, a for-loop. It seems to me, though, that there should be sexier (single command) way of achieving the desired result. However I cannot devise one. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks. cheers, Rolf Turner -- Honorary Research Fellow Department of Statistics University of Auckland Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone: +64-9-373-7...

...can do this very concisely one might argue that it is superfluous to bring in an extra library for this. I think Bert's solution ( `c(do.call(rbind, x))`) is great if `f` has no substantive meaning, and Deepayan's solution (`unsplit(x, f)`) is perfect in case it does - does not get much sexier than that, I am afraid. Best, Lennart Am 27.09.24 um 05:55 schrieb Rolf Turner: > I have (toy example): > > x <- list(`1` = c(7, 13, 1, 4, 10), > `2` = c(2, 5, 14, 8, 11), > `3` = c(6, 9, 15, 12, 3)) > and > > f <- factor(rep(1:3,5)) > &...

...r sit around while my software loads and renders 10 results at a time, just like a ''normal'' webpage. Not sexy. Updating and redrawing a part of the page is only the tip of the iceberg... I feel that it is time to be able to make sorting through larger amounts of data much more sexier, as a standard... Here is my answer to this question, perhaps you have comments, or can enlighten me with other answers. --- A Client-side pre-loading framework...Aka, on the page load we load 100 results into the browser, hide 90 of them in "display:none" divs, then when we click...

I have begun to use the reference function feature of sexy migrations, and I have noticed that the fixtures are actually not playing nice with this new feature. If I create a model, whose table has this line: t.reference :user the fixure will look like one: user: when it should be user_id, now, it may be possible (I don''t know, to define an object in the fixtures now, but when I run

I sent this earlier under with the subject "artificial sugar causes cancer" and I think some spam filters ate it. Here it is again: ====================================== All, If you look at http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=6760&group_id=797&atid=3149 you''ll see that Chad (the submitter) found the source of the bug. Unfortunately, the source

Hey guys, Looking through my book and the web and I am not having any success returning data from a search. I need to have awk search for a string and print the first field which is no problem but now its returning two options as the input data has changed. The change is reliable, I only want the first field if it ends in a regex that I have, and I only want what that regex matches to be printed.

I have installed asterisk on numerous servers. Every install was done on Fedora and (White box Linux). I now have zap channels in one of the boxes (T-1). No matter what type of channel I call on (sip or zap) I get some really strange artifacts in the sound, almost like a skip in the playback. It seems to always be in about the same place in the recording. Usually in the beginning of playback. For