search for: sexy

...inal Message----- From: Rolf Turner <rolfturner at posteo.net> Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2024 10:11 PM To: CALUM POLWART <polc1410 at gmail.com> Cc: avi.e.gross at gmail.com; Lennart Kasserra <lennart.kasserra at gmail.com>; r-help at r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] Is there a sexy way ...? On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 10:26:31 +0100 CALUM POLWART <polc1410 at gmail.com> wrote: > Avi > > I fear this was all a huge social experiment. > > Testing if a post titled "sexy way" would increase engagement... <SNIP> I conjecture that this conjecture...

On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 10:26:31 +0100 CALUM POLWART <polc1410 at gmail.com> wrote: > Avi > > I fear this was all a huge social experiment. > > Testing if a post titled "sexy way" would increase engagement... <SNIP> I conjecture that this conjecture was tongue-in-cheek. Be that as it were ??, let me assure everyone that such was not my intention. The usage is just my manner of speaking. cheers, Rolf -- Honorary Research Fellow Department of Statistics...

"Sexy code" may get a job done and demonstrate the code's knowledge of a programming language, but it often does this at the expense of clear, easy to document (i.e. annotate what the code does), easy to read, and easy to understand code. I fear that this is what this thread has developed "...

Avi I fear this was all a huge social experiment. Testing if a post titled "sexy way" would increase engagement... On Sat, 28 Sep 2024, 07:21 , <avi.e.gross at gmail.com> wrote: > I see a book coming: > "666 ways to do the same thing in R ranked by sexiness." > > Kidding aside, if you look under the covers of some of the functions we &...

Rold, We need to be clear on what makes an answer sexy! LOL! I decided it was sexy to do it in a way that nobody (normal) would and had not suggested yet. Here is an original version I will explain in a minute. Or, maybe best a bit before. Hee is the unformatted result whicvh is a tad hard to read but will be made readable soon: x <- list(`1` = c...

...came up with ideas. I have seen others who ask some open-ended question, often using a brand new idea, and do not interact. Some rumors have it that there may be motives ranging from wasting everyone?s time to gathering the best ideas into a book or something. It is amusing that Rolf chose ?sexy? so what would be acceptable? I think it is often fair to ask for a more efficient way, or to ask if there is a package that does it or makes it easier or to ask how to do it in the base language or how to make it handle errors and so on. In some languages, people talk about whether some co...

.... I've tried fiddling about with tapply() and by() but the result is a list whose i-th component consists of the ranks of the scores within the i-th district. I then have trouble figuring out how to put these results into a column of the data frame in the proper order. Is there a slick-quick-sexy way of doing this (without resorting to looping)? Am I missing something obvious? Thanks for any help bestowed. cheers, Rolf Turner rolf at math.unb.ca

...quite vast. -----Original Message----- From: R-help <r-help-bounces at r-project.org> On Behalf Of Lennart Kasserra Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2024 1:59 AM To: Rolf Turner <rolfturner at posteo.net>; r-help at r-project.org; lennart.kasserra at gmail.com Subject: Re: [R] Is there a sexy way ...? Sorry to append, but I just realised that of course ``` x |> pmap(c) |> reduce(c) |> unname() ``` also works and is a general solution in case your list has more than three elements. Here, we map in parallel over all elements of the list, always combining the curre...

...y, a for-loop.? It seems to me, >>> though, that there should be sexier (single command) way of achieving >>> the desired result.? However I cannot devise one. >>> >> >> Don't you find a for loop's naked display of intention to be sexy? >> >> Duncan Murdoch >> > -- > Chris Evans (he/him) > Visiting Professor, UDLA, Quito, Ecuador & Honorary Professor, > University of Roehampton, London, UK. > CORE site: http://www.coresystemtrust.org.uk > Other work w...

On 2024-09-28 13:57, avi.e.gross at gmail.com wrote: > Python users often ask if a solution is ?pythonic?. But I am not aware > of R users having any special name like ?R-thritic? and that may be a > good thing.

Ok, I give up: what's that supposed to look like? I tried to replace makeNstr with paste(rep(..)) but got garbage. (my own fault: I still like 10.3.9, so can't install a new enough version of R to install the Hmisc package) Carl

Norton AntiVirus found a virus in an attachment you (samba) sent to tlydon@feeplan.com. To ensure the recipient(s) are able to use the files you sent, perform a virus scan on your computer, clean any infected files, then resend this attachment. Attachment: target.bat Virus name: W32.Klez.H@mm Action taken: Clean failed : Quarantine succeeded : File status: Infected -------------- next

Sorry to append, but I just realised that of course ``` x |> ? pmap(c) |> ? reduce(c) |> ? unname() ``` also works and is a general solution in case your list has more than three elements. Here, we map in parallel over all elements of the list, always combining the current set of elements into a vector, and then reduce the resulting list into a vector by combining the elements

I have (toy example): x <- list(`1` = c(7, 13, 1, 4, 10), `2` = c(2, 5, 14, 8, 11), `3` = c(6, 9, 15, 12, 3)) and f <- factor(rep(1:3,5)) I want to create a vector v of length 15 such that the entries of v, corresponding to level l of f are the entries of x[[l]]. I.e. I want v to equal c(7, 2, 6, 13, 5, 9, 1, 14, 15, 4, 8, 12, 10, 11, 3) I can create v

Hi Rolf, this topic is probably already saturated, but here is a tidyverse solution: ``` library(purrr) x <- list( ? `1` = c(7, 13, 1, 4, 10), ? `2` = c(2, 5,? 14, 8, 11), ? `3` = c(6, 9, 15, 12, 3) ) x |> ? pmap(~ c(..1, ..2, ..3)) |> ? reduce(c) #> [1]? 7? 2? 6 13? 5? 9? 1 14 15? 4? 8 12 10 11? 3 ``` Here, we map over the elements of the list in parallel (hence pmap),

...ons render partials on this page, probably with rjs. Already done it? Great, these questions are for you then: 1. Browser pre-loading. I am interested in NOT having the user sit around while my software loads and renders 10 results at a time, just like a ''normal'' webpage. Not sexy. Updating and redrawing a part of the page is only the tip of the iceberg... I feel that it is time to be able to make sorting through larger amounts of data much more sexier, as a standard... Here is my answer to this question, perhaps you have comments, or can enlighten me with other answers...

I have begun to use the reference function feature of sexy migrations, and I have noticed that the fixtures are actually not playing nice with this new feature. If I create a model, whose table has this line: t.reference :user the fixure will look like one: user: when it should be user_id, now, it may be possible (I don''t know, to define an...

...t not addressing this leaves us in a crippled position in which we commit to being sidetracked by this issue constantly returning instead of focusing on enhancing the API. I also think that this is a better option than any of the following that also crossed my mind: * revert to dots * figure out a sexy way to intercept all attempts to rewrite method missing and re-inject RSpec''s method missing in its place (perhaps this does sound sexy, but I doth believe that there is a venereal disease hiding in its midst) * leave things as they are and continue to add ugly hacks like NilClass.handle_u...

...The change is reliable, I only want the first field if it ends in a regex that I have, and I only want what that regex matches to be printed. Is it possible to do this in a one liner so I don't need to construct an awk script? I suppose I could pipe it into grep and cut but that's not very sexy :) Any ideas? Thanks! jlc

...n about the same place in the recording. Usually in the beginning of playback. For instance somewhere in the "Comedian mail" part part of the voicemail greeting it will hick-up, it also happens to Meetme and some other agi/php stuff I am using. Someone please help me make Allison sound as sexy as she is supposed to sound! Jordan Novak Communications Technician Logistics Health Inc. 1319 Saint Andrews Street La Crosse WI 54603 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060317/1...