search for: sexier

...ector v of length 15 such that the entries of v, corresponding to level l of f are the entries of x[[l]]. I.e. I want v to equal c(7, 2, 6, 13, 5, 9, 1, 14, 15, 4, 8, 12, 10, 11, 3) I can create v "easily enough", using say, a for-loop. It seems to me, though, that there should be sexier (single command) way of achieving the desired result. However I cannot devise one. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks. cheers, Rolf Turner -- Honorary Research Fellow Department of Statistics University of Auckland Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone: +64-9-373-759...

...f course''. The cflag just gets treated as another predictor and because it is of the wrong length an error is generated. The best I could come up with was lm(as.formula(paste("y ~ x -",cflag))) Which is kludgy. It (of course!) also be done using an if statement. Is there a sexier way? cheers, Rolf Turner

...can do this very concisely one might argue that it is superfluous to bring in an extra library for this. I think Bert's solution ( `c(do.call(rbind, x))`) is great if `f` has no substantive meaning, and Deepayan's solution (`unsplit(x, f)`) is perfect in case it does - does not get much sexier than that, I am afraid. Best, Lennart Am 27.09.24 um 05:55 schrieb Rolf Turner: > I have (toy example): > > x <- list(`1` = c(7, 13, 1, 4, 10), > `2` = c(2, 5, 14, 8, 11), > `3` = c(6, 9, 15, 12, 3)) > and > > f <- factor(rep(1:3,5)) > &gt...

...present in the factor. But if ``Scholarship'' is absent (as if often is) then I get an error. I can do a workaround such as fff <- factor(c("U","A","S")[fff],levels=c("U","A","S")) but this seems kludgy to me. Is there a sexier way? cheers, Rolf Turner ###################################################################### Attention:\ This e-mail message is privileged and confidenti...{{dropped}}

For reasons best known only to myself ( :-) ) I wish to create a data frame with 0 rows and 9 columns. The best I've been able to come up with is: junk <- as.data.frame(matrix(0,nrow=0,ncol=9)) Is there a sexier way? cheers, Rolf ###################################################################### Attention:\ This e-mail message is privileged and confid...{{dropped:9}}

...) plot(1:10) legend("bottomright",pch=1:5,legend=parse(text=leg)) Note that the use of "parse" (pace Thomas Lumley! :-) ) is required --- "legend=leg" does NOT work. Getting here required an enormous amount of trial and error. And it seems pretty kludgy. Is there a sexier way? R. T.

...y one might argue > that it is superfluous to bring in an extra library for this. I think > Bert's solution ( > `c(do.call(rbind, x))`) is great if `f` has no substantive meaning, > and Deepayan's solution (`unsplit(x, f)`) is perfect in case it does - > does not get much sexier than that, I am afraid. > > Best, > > Lennart > > > Am 27.09.24 um 05:55 schrieb Rolf Turner: >> I have (toy example): >> >> x <- list(`1` = c(7, 13, 1, 4, 10), >> ?????????? `2` = c(2, 5,? 14, 8, 11), >> ?????????? `3` = c(6, 9, 15, 12, 3)) &gt...

...y one might argue > that it is superfluous to bring in an extra library for this. I think > Bert's solution ( > `c(do.call(rbind, x))`) is great if `f` has no substantive meaning, > and Deepayan's solution (`unsplit(x, f)`) is perfect in case it does - > does not get much sexier than that, I am afraid. > > Best, > > Lennart > > > Am 27.09.24 um 05:55 schrieb Rolf Turner: >> I have (toy example): >> >> x <- list(`1` = c(7, 13, 1, 4, 10), >> `2` = c(2, 5, 14, 8, 11), >> `3` = c(6, 9, 15, 12, 3)) &gt...

...; > that it is superfluous to bring in an extra library for this. I think > > Bert's solution ( > > `c(do.call(rbind, x))`) is great if `f` has no substantive meaning, > > and Deepayan's solution (`unsplit(x, f)`) is perfect in case it does - > > does not get much sexier than that, I am afraid. > > > > Best, > > > > Lennart > > > > > > Am 27.09.24 um 05:55 schrieb Rolf Turner: > >> I have (toy example): > >> > >> x <- list(`1` = c(7, 13, 1, 4, 10), > >> `2` = c(2, 5, 14, 8,...

...ave 4 methods, and the database will always have the same number of fields. I will probably create the database through create_table or a direct SQL command. My question is this - is there a method that I can call to create the model and controllers? Would it be easier/simpler/cleaner/better/sexier to have the current (main) model create dynamic methods? If so, how can I do that? Domo arigato in advance. Lisa -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...he way I am thinking of proceeding is along the xlines of: ymiss <- is.na(y) rslt <- .Fortran( "foo", NAOK=TRUE, as.double(y), as.logical(ymiss), etc, etc ) and inside ``foo'' have a logical branch based on the value of xmiss(i). Questions: (1) Is there a sexier way to proceed? E.g. is it possible within (g77) fortran to detect the fact that y(i) is/was an NA (or not) and make the nature of y(i) the basis of an if-statement? (2) Are there any lurking pitfalls in the use of the NAOK=TRUE argument? (3) Is there an entirely different and better way t...

Admit it, Rolf. Haven't you wondered if S, in a more private way, is sexier than R? OK, kidding aside, we have talked this to death. Just FYI, the conversation was stimulating for some of us and I have continued on my own and located functions I see as useful in the stringi and stringr packages to make my silly version ever less silly! LOL! -----Original Message----- F...

...are of course several work-arounds. (E.g. calculate my b_i- hats and their standard errors from the information obtained from the usual model structure. Or set up my own dummy variable to regress upon. Easy enough, and I could do that.) I just wanted to know for sure that there wasn't a sexier way, using some aspect of the formula machinery with which I am not yet familiar. Thanks for any insights. cheers, Rolf Turner ###################################################################### Attention:\ This e-mail message is privileged and confid...{{dropped:9}}

...].? I.e. I want >>> v to equal >>> >>> ???? c(7, 2, 6, 13, 5, 9, 1, 14, 15, 4, 8, 12, 10, 11, 3) >>> >>> I can create v "easily enough", using say, a for-loop.? It seems to me, >>> though, that there should be sexier (single command) way of achieving >>> the desired result.? However I cannot devise one. >>> >> >> Don't you find a for loop's naked display of intention to be sexy? >> >> Duncan Murdoch >> > -- >...

...ess call. But I will say that, given minimal testing, the output quality doesn't seem to suffer at all. And the lack of the very loud keyboard pops and squeals is a real improvement. I guess I don't understand your resistance to squelch, it's a very well-tested idiom. Sure, there are sexier algorithms out there, but there's still room for squelch in a modern application. Andy

...y one might argue > that it is superfluous to bring in an extra library for this. I think > Bert's solution ( > `c(do.call(rbind, x))`) is great if `f` has no substantive meaning, > and Deepayan's solution (`unsplit(x, f)`) is perfect in case it does - > does not get much sexier than that, I am afraid. > > Best, > > Lennart > > > Am 27.09.24 um 05:55 schrieb Rolf Turner: >> I have (toy example): >> >> x <- list(`1` = c(7, 13, 1, 4, 10), >> `2` = c(2, 5, 14, 8, 11), >> `3` = c(6, 9, 15, 12, 3)) &gt...

...about also varying the SNR from 0 dB to 30 dB. Still perfect performance across the range? If so, please submit to http://www.ieee.org/organizations/society/sp/infotsa.html ... > I guess I don't understand your resistance to squelch, it's a very > well-tested idiom. Sure, there are sexier algorithms out there, but > there's still room for squelch in a modern application. As I mentioned before, if you find a good algorithm that'll work across any (or a good range of) input level and SNR, I'll be quite happy to consider it. Jean-Marc

On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 10:26:31 +0100 CALUM POLWART <polc1410 at gmail.com> wrote: > Avi > > I fear this was all a huge social experiment. > > Testing if a post titled "sexy way" would increase engagement... <SNIP> I conjecture that this conjecture was tongue-in-cheek. Be that as it were ??, let me assure everyone that such was not my intention. The usage

...on a category in the left box, it goes to the right box an vice-versa. When the user clicks a save button, the categories in the right side box are saved. I can re-implement my js code on my Rails site, but I was hoping to find something that integrated w/Rails better and maybe even a bit more sexier. Any suggestions? - jason -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...; start,n,Hangup() > Thanks for your answer. > However what I would like to achieve is a little bit more complicated. > It involves the manager to originate a call and put a participant in the > conference. I made a workaround with an agi script but I would > definitely prefer a sexier method to do it (like I said with an option > to the application). > > Thanks for your hint anyway. I'm not sure how that restricts you from using a dialplan trick, since the originate you're doing from your AMI interface is still going to execute dialplan (or could). Additi...