On 13 Dec 2013, at 08:03 , ???? <1248283536 at qq.com> wrote:
> in http://www.ascii-code.com/, you can see the the hex value of ? is 8C,
>
(Looks like Brian got his version mangled in transmission.)
Anything above 7F is not ASCII.
Various "8-bit extensions" put various non-ASCII characters at various
places in the range 80-FF. Your reference shows the Latin-1 encoding which
covers the Western European languages. That was useful for a while [*], until
the West and the East began talking to eachother and found that the other
party's documents were putting different characters in the same places of
different encodings.
UTF-8 uses multibyte sequences like c5 92 to represent extra characters, which
allows you to have more than 128 of them.
http://www.utf8-chartable.de/unicode-utf8-table.pl?start=256
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/Unicode.html
-pd
[*] A short while, actually, because it was preceded by another encoding mess
known as IBM Code Pages. Famously, in this country, IBM computers (and many 3rd
party printers!) shipped with a code page missing the O-slash Danish character
which got printed as "cent"/"Yen"!
>
>
>
>
>
> why in my R console ?
> charToRaw("?")
> [1] c5 92
> is not 8C ?
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
--
Peter Dalgaard, Professor,
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com