Fellow R users,
I'm trying to upgrade from 2.11 to 3.0.1. I have a legacy S3 class
defining method "DAILY" within one of our "in-house"
packages using
R.oo. This method does not seem to get 'resolved' under 3.0.1,
specifically the following does not work:
----CODE WITHIN PACKAGE (e.g. MyPackage)-----
setConstructorS3("MyTestClass", function(name = NULL, ...) {
this <- extend(RObject(), "MyTestClass", .units = NULL,
.numUnits NULL, .name = name) #RObject extends Object and adds couple of
simple
methods
return(this)
})
setMethodS3("DAILY", "MyTestClass", function(this, ...) {
print("In DAILY.MyTestClass")
})
setMethodS3("DAILY2", "MyTestClass", function(this, ...) {
print("In DAILY2.MyTestClass")
})
setMethodS3("Daily", "MyTestClass", function(this, ...) {
print("In Daily.MyTestClass")
})
----CONSOLE---------------------------> library(MyPackage)
> MyTestClass$DAILY()
Error in MyTestClass$DAILY() : could not find function
"DAILY"> DAILY.MyTestClass()
[1] "In DAILY.MyTestClass"> MyTestClass$DAILY2()
[1] "In DAILY2.MyTestClass"> MyTestClass$Daily()
[1] "In Daily.MyTestClass"
--------------------------------------------
Any ideas as to why MyTestClass$DAILY() fails under 3.0.1 and what is
the best way to fix this?? I can always change the method name, yet I
wouldn't know what other methods might have similar issues.. This all
worked fine in 2.11.
Also - if I "source" this code it works fine.
Many thanks,
Alex
=============================================================================================================
This material has been prepared by individual sales and/or trading personnel and
does not
constitute investment research. Please follow the attached hyperlink to an
important disclaimer:
http://www.credit-suisse.com/americas/legal/salestrading
=============================================================================================================
===============================================================================
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important el...{{dropped:4}}
Hi All: I am getting some warnings trying to run the following code and I am not sure what they mean.> set.seed(111) > k<-63 > n<-60 > x<-NULL > p<-rbeta(k,3,3)# so that the mean nausea rate is alpha/(alpha+beta) > #min<-10 > #max<-60 > #n<-as.integer(runif(k,min,max)) > for(i in 1:k)+ x<-cbind(x,rbinom(300,n,p[i]))> x<-t(x) > rate<-t(t(x)/n) > se_rate<-sqrt(rate*(1-rate)/n) > > > > # Exact Confidence Interval > > l_cl_exact<-qbeta(.025,x,n-x+1)There were 50 or more warnings (use warnings() to see the first 50)> u_cl_exact<-qbeta(.975,x+1,n-x) > > for (i in 1:63){+ + for (j in 1:300) + { + + if (x[i,j]==0) + { + l_cl_exact[i,j]<-0 + u_cl_exact[i,j]<-u_cl_exact[i,j] + } + else if (x[i,j]==n[i]) + { + l_cl_exact[i,j]<-l_cl_exact[i,j] + u_cl_exact[i,j]<-1 + } + else + l_cl_exact[i,j]<-l_cl_exact[i,j] + u_cl_exact[i,j]<-u_cl_exact[i,j] + + #print(c(i,j)) + + } + } Error in if (x[i, j] == n[i]) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed> > > > > > > rate_t<-t(rate) > > l_cl_exact_t<-t(l_cl_exact) > u_cl_exact_t<-t(u_cl_exact) > > coverage<-matrix(data=0,nrow=300,ncol=63) > int_width<-matrix(data=0,nrow=300,ncol=63) > sqr_err<-matrix(data=0,nrow=300,ncol=63) > abs_bias<-matrix(data=0,nrow=300,ncol=63) > > for (i in 1:300){+ + for (j in 1:63) + { + + + if ((p[j]>l_cl_exact_t[i,j]) & (p[j]<u_cl_exact_t[i,j])) + { + coverage[i,j]<-1 + } + else{ + coverage[i,j]<-0 + + } + + int_width[i,j]<-u_cl_exact_t[i,j]-l_cl_exact_t[i,j] + + sqr_err[i,j]<-((rate_t[i,j]-p[j])^2)/0.5 + + abs_bias[i,j]<-abs(rate_t[i,j]-p[j]) + + #print(c(i,j)) + + } + }> avg_cov<-apply(coverage,1,mean) > cov_prob<-mean(avg_cov) > 1-cov_prob# Non-Coverage Probability[1] 0.03433862> > avg_int<-apply(int_width,1,mean) > mean(avg_int)# Average Interval width[1] 0.2408541> > avg_sqr_err<-apply(sqr_err,1,mean) > mean(avg_sqr_err)# Average Squared Error Loss[1] 0.007104948> > avg_abs_bias<-apply(abs_bias,1,mean) > mean(abs_bias)[1] 0.04738646> warnings()Warning messages: 1: In qbeta(0.025, x, n - x + 1) : pbeta_raw() -> bratio() gave error code 6 2: In qbeta(0.025, x, n - x + 1) : pbeta_raw() -> bratio() gave error code 6 3: In qbeta(0.025, x, n - x + 1) : pbeta_raw() -> bratio() gave error code 6 4: In qbeta(0.025, x, n - x + 1) : pbeta_raw() -> bratio() gave error code 6 5: In qbeta(0.025, x, n - x + 1) : pbeta_raw() -> bratio() gave error code 6 Thanks Anamika [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Hi, R.oo author here: This looks like a possible namespace issues, which might have gone under the radar if you have only used R v2.11.x until now. Could you forward me your MyPackage test package so I can troubleshoot/reproduce (I think the answer is in your DESCRIPTION/NAMESPACE file). /Henrik On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Grach, Alexander <alexander.grach at credit-suisse.com> wrote:> Fellow R users, > > I'm trying to upgrade from 2.11 to 3.0.1. I have a legacy S3 class > defining method "DAILY" within one of our "in-house" packages using > R.oo. This method does not seem to get 'resolved' under 3.0.1, > specifically the following does not work: > > ----CODE WITHIN PACKAGE (e.g. MyPackage)----- > setConstructorS3("MyTestClass", function(name = NULL, ...) { > this <- extend(RObject(), "MyTestClass", .units = NULL, .numUnits > NULL, .name = name) #RObject extends Object and adds couple of simple > methods > return(this) > }) > > setMethodS3("DAILY", "MyTestClass", function(this, ...) { > print("In DAILY.MyTestClass") > }) > > setMethodS3("DAILY2", "MyTestClass", function(this, ...) { > print("In DAILY2.MyTestClass") > }) > > setMethodS3("Daily", "MyTestClass", function(this, ...) { > print("In Daily.MyTestClass") > }) > > ----CONSOLE--------------------------- >> library(MyPackage) >> MyTestClass$DAILY() > Error in MyTestClass$DAILY() : could not find function "DAILY" >> DAILY.MyTestClass() > [1] "In DAILY.MyTestClass" >> MyTestClass$DAILY2() > [1] "In DAILY2.MyTestClass" >> MyTestClass$Daily() > [1] "In Daily.MyTestClass" > -------------------------------------------- > > Any ideas as to why MyTestClass$DAILY() fails under 3.0.1 and what is > the best way to fix this?? I can always change the method name, yet I > wouldn't know what other methods might have similar issues.. This all > worked fine in 2.11. > Also - if I "source" this code it works fine. > > Many thanks, > Alex > > > > ============================================================================================================> This material has been prepared by individual sales and/or trading personnel and does not > constitute investment research. Please follow the attached hyperlink to an important disclaimer: > http://www.credit-suisse.com/americas/legal/salestrading > ============================================================================================================> > > ==============================================================================> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important el...{{dropped:4}} > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.