Dear list, I have a question related to the correct interpretation of the relative convergence criterion used by 'optim'. In the help of the function is it written that: "reltol:Relative convergence tolerance. The algorithm stops if it is unable to reduce the value by a factor of reltol * (abs(val) + reltol) at a step." and I was wondering if the previous criterion is equivalent to: abs( val [iter] - val[iter-1] ) / val [iter-1] <= reltol * ( abs( val [iter] ) + reltol ) OR abs( val [iter] / val [iter-1] ) <= reltol * ( abs( val [iter] ) + reltol ) OR abs( val [iter] - val [iter-1] ) <= reltol * ( abs( val [iter] ) + reltol ) Thanks in advance for any help, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini -- ====================================Water Resources Unit Institute for Environment and Sustainability Joint Research Centre, European Commission webinfo : http://floods.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ ====================================DISCLAIMER:\ "The views expressed are purely those of th...{{dropped:13}}
2012/11/5 Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini <hzambran.newsgroups at gmail.com>:> Dear list, > > I have a question related to the correct interpretation of the > relative convergence criterion used by 'optim'. > > > In the help of the function is it written that: > > "reltol:Relative convergence tolerance. The algorithm stops if it is > unable to reduce the value by a factor of reltol * (abs(val) + reltol) > at a step." > > and I was wondering if the previous criterion is equivalent to: > > > abs( val [iter] - val[iter-1] ) / val [iter-1] <= reltol * ( abs( val > [iter] ) + reltol ) > > OR > > abs( val [iter] / val [iter-1] ) <= reltol * ( abs( val [iter] ) + reltol ) > > OR > > abs( val [iter] - val [iter-1] ) <= reltol * ( abs( val [iter] ) + reltol )Just in case it be useful for somebody else.>From the C code on http://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/appl/optim.c :... enough = (f > abstol) && fabs(f - *Fmin) > reltol * (fabs(*Fmin) + reltol); /* stop if value if small or if relative change is low */ if (!enough) { count = n; *Fmin = f; } ... which I would write in R as: reltol <- abs( f - f.best ) <= reltol * ( abs(f.best) + reltol ) Cheers, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini -- ====================================Water Resources Unit Institute for Environment and Sustainability Joint Research Centre, European Commission webinfo : http://floods.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ ====================================DISCLAIMER:\ "The views expressed are purely those of th...{{dropped:11}}