Can anyone tell me why I would get different average nearest neighbor values for the same set of coordinates between ArcGIS 10 and R? Sometimes the difference in distance is over 1.3 km. Alexis -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/nndist-R-vs-ArcGIS-tp3442375p3442375.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Alexis wrote:> Can anyone tell me why I would get different average nearest neighborvalues> for the same set of coordinates between ArcGIS 10 and R? Sometimes the > difference in distance is over 1.3 km.spatstat::nndist calculates Euclidean distances rather than distances along the earth's surface, which is probably what you're getting from AG. A very short example illustrating the problem would be helpful in determining if I'm at all right; on the other hand I'm glad you're testing your results. You might peek at the current thread "Geographic distance between lat-long points in R" for more information. cur -- Curt Seeliger, Data Ranger Raytheon Information Services - Contractor to ORD seeliger.curt@epa.gov 541/754-4638 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:49 PM, smoluka <smoluka at geo.oregonstate.edu> wrote:> Can anyone tell me why I would get different average nearest neighbor values > for the same set of coordinates between ArcGIS 10 and R? Sometimes the > difference in distance is over 1.3 km.Edge correction? In a spatial point pattern, points near the boundary of your window are less likely to have a near neighbour because only some of the surrounding space can possibly have points. I think functions in spatstat will correct for this. Make a simple test example and tell us what functions you are using. And also try the r-sig-geo mailing list for this sort of thing. Barry
On 12/04/11 07:32, Barry Rowlingson wrote:> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:49 PM, smoluka<smoluka at geo.oregonstate.edu> wrote: >> Can anyone tell me why I would get different average nearest neighbor values >> for the same set of coordinates between ArcGIS 10 and R? Sometimes the >> difference in distance is over 1.3 km. > Edge correction? In a spatial point pattern, points near the boundary > of your window are less likely to have a near neighbour because only > some of the surrounding space can possibly have points. I think > functions in spatstat will correct for this.No. Not as far as I am aware or can discern. The function nndist() does ***not*** invoke any edge correction. It simply calculates the distances as they are, for the points that appear in the window, and takes the appropriate minima. cheers, Rolf Turner> Make a simple test example and tell us what functions you are using. > > And also try the r-sig-geo mailing list for this sort of thing. > > Barry
The problem was on the ArcGIS 10 end. The program corrupted my layers. I re-created the layer and now I get the same answer. Thank you all for your insight. Alexis PS, the scale is in terms of owl territories and therefore 1.3 km is really huge. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/nndist-R-vs-ArcGIS-tp3442375p3444701.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Maybe Matching Threads
- Reading an ArcGIS raster file
- Mysterious issues with reading text files from R in ArcGIS and Excel
- R(D)-COM stat conenctor for ArcGIS
- why variations in accuracy between R to ARCGIS for the same point reprojection?
- Speeding up simulation of mean nearest neighbor distances