On Apr 8, 2011, at 06:08 , Russ Abbott wrote:
> Haskell is the prototypical lazy evaluation language. One can compute a
> Fibonacci sequence by the Haaskell equivalent of the following R code.
>
>> fibs <- c(0, 1, rep(0, 8))
>> fibs[3:10] <- fibs + fibs[-1]
>
> This works as follows.
>
> fibs = 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
> fibs = 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
>
> When one adds fibs to fibs[-1], one is effectively adding diagonally:
> fibs[3] <- fibs[1] + fibs[2]
> fibs[4] <- fibs[2] + fibs[3]
> fibs[5] <- fibs[3] + fibs[4]
> etc.
>
> In Haskell, the value of fibs[3] used to compute fibs[4] is the value just
> created by adding fibs[1] and fibs[2]. Similarly the value of fibs[4] used
> to compute fibs[5] is the value that was just created in the previous
> addition. In other words:
>
> fibs[3] <- fibs[1] + fibs[2] # 0 + 1 = 1
> fibs[4] <- fibs[2] + fibs[3] # 1 + 1 = 2
> fibs[5] <- fibs[3] + fibs[4] # 1 + 2 = 3
> fibs[6] <- fibs[4] + fibs[5] # 2 + 3 = 5
> etc.
>
>
> But if you actually carry out this calculation in R, this is you get.
>
>> v <- c(0, 1, rep(0, 8))
>
>> v
>
> [1] 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>
>> v[3:10] <- v + v[-1]
>
> Warning messages:
>
> 1: In v + v[-1] :
>
> longer object length is not a multiple of shorter object length
>
> 2: In v[3:10] <- v + v[-1] :
>
> number of items to replace is not a multiple of replacement length
>
>> v
>
> [1] 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
>
>
> Is there any way to make this work?
>
I should hope not.... (it would break call-by-value semantics, for one thing)
The closest you can get is something like
> delayedAssign("fib6", fib5+fib4)
> delayedAssign("fib5", fib4+fib3)
> delayedAssign("fib4", fib3+fib2)
> delayedAssign("fib3", fib2+fib1)
> delayedAssign("fib2", 1)
> delayedAssign("fib1", 0)
> fib6
[1] 5
(you can construct those assignments programmatically in a loop with a little
extra work.)
--
Peter Dalgaard
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com