I have a problem integrating the 'standard map' ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_map http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_map ) with deSolve: By using the modulo-operator '%%' with 2*pi in the ODEs (standardmap1), the resulting values of P and Theta, should not be greater than 2pi. Because this was not the case, i was thinking that the function 'ode' has some internal problems with the '%%' or integrating periodical ODEs, so I wrote a modulo-function by myself (modulo and standardmap2). But still I get values much higher than 2pi and I cannot find the error... Any guess? Thanks Full code: ---------------------------------------------------------------- library(deSolve) iterations <- 100 Parameter <- c(k = 0.6) State <- c(Theta = 1 , P = 1) Time <- 0:iterations/10 standardmap1 <- function(Time, State, Parameter){ with(as.list(c(State, Parameter)), { dP <- (P + k * sin(Theta)) %% (2 * pi) dTheta <- (P + Theta) %% (2 * pi) return(list(c(dP, dTheta))) }) } #solve ode using standardmap1 out1 <- as.data.frame(ode(func = standardmap1, y = State,parms = Parameter, times = Time)) # x mod y, end: maximal iterations modulo <- function(x,y,end=1000){ for (n in 0:end) if (x > (n-1)*y) z = x - (n-1)*y if (z > 0) return(z) else break } standardmap2 <- function(Time, State, Parameter){ with(as.list(c(State, Parameter)), { dTheta <- modulo((P + Theta),(2*pi)) dP <- modulo(P + k *sin(Theta),(2*pi)) return(list(c(dP, dTheta))) }) } #solve ode using standardmap2 out2 <- as.data.frame(ode(func = standardmap2, y = State,parms = Parameter, times = Time)) #plot the results matplot(out1[2],out1[3], type = "p", pch = ".") matplot(out2[2],out2[3], type = "p", pch = ".") -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/deSolve-Problem-solving-ODE-including-modulo-operator-tp3236396p3236396.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thomas Petzoldt
2011-Jan-30 17:54 UTC
[R] deSolve: Problem solving ODE including modulo-operator
Dear Albert2002, there is no problem with deSolve and, of course, no problem with R's modulo operator, but there are at least two errors in your model formulation: 1.) The order of the returned derivatives must be exactly the same as specified in the state variables. This is documented in the help files and mentioned in section "Troubleshooting" (11.2) in the deSolve vignette. You use: State <- c(Theta = 1 , P = 1) return(list(c(dP, dTheta))) but you should use: State <- c(P = 1, Theta = 1) return(list(c(dP, dTheta))) 2.) Your model is **not a differential equation** but a difference equation. It is (1) discrete (not continuous) and returns the new state (not the derivative). As the name of deSolve suggests, this package is primarily for differential equations. Nevertheless, it can be useful for difference equations too, if one respects the distinction. Solution A: ========== Use the new development version of deSolve from http://deSolve.r-forge.r-project.org that has a solver method "iteration" for this type of models: out1 <- ode(func = standardmap1, y = State,parms = Parameter, times = Time, method = "iteration") plot(out1) Solution B: ========== Rewrite your model so that it returns the 'derivative' and not the new state and use method="euler". This works already with recent versions of deSolve. iterations <- 100 Parameter <- c(k = 0.6) State <- c(P=1, Theta = 1 ) Time <- 0:iterations standardmap2 <- function(Time, State, Parameter){ with(as.list(c(State, Parameter)), { P1 <- (P + k * sin(Theta)) %% (2 * pi) Theta1 <- (P + Theta) %% (2 * pi) return(list(c(P1-P, Theta1-Theta))) }) } out2 <- ode(func = standardmap2, y = State, parms = Parameter, times = Time, method = "euler") plot(out2) ##------------------------------------------------------------ You may also consider to rewrite your problem in matrix form to get the full map easily and without using loops. If you have further questions, consider to subscribe to the "dynamic models in R" mailing list: R-sig-dynamic-models at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-dynamic-models Hope it helps Thomas Petzoldt
Reasonably Related Threads
- deSolve, extracting variable values from inside ode function
- External signal in ODE written in C (using deSolve and approx1?)
- vectors of equations in ode / desolve
- ode() tries to allocate an absurd amount of memory
- Wrapper function for multivariate arrays for ode