Barth B. Riley
2010-Oct-07 18:21 UTC
[R] Computing a Mantel-Haenszel chi-square using a continuous variable as the matching criterion
Dear list I would like to compute a Mantel-Haenszel chi-square in which the matching variable is a continuous variable. The MH chi-square is used to assess the relationship between two categorical variables at each level or strata defined by a third variable. Specifically I would like to know if there is a straightforward way to divide the matching variable into levels, in which each level has a minimum of 20 cases. Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance Barth ________________________________ PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION This transmittal and any attachments may contain PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL information and is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the designated recipient, or an employee or agent authorized to deliver such transmittals to the designated recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or publication of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender and delete this copy from your system. You may also call us at (309) 827-6026 for assistance. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
David Winsemius
2010-Oct-07 18:24 UTC
[R] Computing a Mantel-Haenszel chi-square using a continuous variable as the matching criterion
On Oct 7, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Barth B. Riley wrote:> Dear list > > I would like to compute a Mantel-Haenszel chi-square in which the > matching variable is a continuous variable. The MH chi-square is > used to assess the relationship between two categorical variables at > each level or strata defined by a third variable. Specifically I > would like to know if there is a straightforward way to divide the > matching variable into levels, in which each level has a minimum of > 20 cases. Any information would be greatly appreciated.Why? What makes you think matching would be valuable? (...or even valid, for that matter.)> > Thanks in advance > > Barth-- David Winsemius, MD West Hartford, CT