song song
2010-Jul-05 00:20 UTC
[R] if using ginv function, does it mean there is no need to use solve function any more?
since ginv can deal with both singular and non-singular conditions, is there any other difference between them? if I use ginv only, will be any problem? thanks [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Bill.Venables at csiro.au
2010-Jul-05 00:49 UTC
[R] if using ginv function, does it mean there is no need to use solve function any more?
ginv() is slower than solve(). This is the price you pay for more generality. -----Original Message----- From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of song song Sent: Monday, 5 July 2010 10:21 AM To: r-help at r-project.org Subject: [R] if using ginv function, does it mean there is no need to use solve function any more? since ginv can deal with both singular and non-singular conditions, is there any other difference between them? if I use ginv only, will be any problem? thanks [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.