wesman2k1 at aim.com
2010-Apr-21 18:26 UTC
[R] Degrees of Freedom Not Allocated to Residuals in Reduced Model
##I am trying to test for fixed factor main effects in an unbalanced mixed effects model but when I fit the reduced model for "mic" factor effects, the extra degrees of freedom are being allocated to a nested term rather than the residuals. The model has inc, mic and spp are independent variables and vial nested within spp. inc and spp are already coded as factors since they were entered as text in the dataframe "t". ##Full Model> fit<-lm(cmm~inc+factor(mic)+spp/factor(vial),t) > anova(fit)Analysis of Variance Table Response: cmm Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) inc 1 2099.3 2099.3 387.6854 < 2.2e-16 *** factor(mic) 2 502.3 251.2 46.3823 < 2.2e-16 *** spp 2 7947.1 3973.5 733.8008 < 2.2e-16 *** spp:factor(vial) 94 3746.9 39.9 7.3612 < 2.2e-16 *** Residuals 1112 6021.5 5.4 ## Reduced Model> fitredmic<-lm(cmm~inc+spp/factor(vial),t) > anova(fitredmic)Analysis of Variance Table Response: cmm Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) inc 1 2099.3 2099.3 387.6854 < 2.2e-16 *** spp 2 8149.7 4074.9 752.5124 < 2.2e-16 *** spp:factor(vial) 96 4046.6 42.2 7.7843 < 2.2e-16 *** Residuals 1112 6021.5 5.4 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 ##So the degrees of freedom for the comparison are 0:> anova(fit,fitredmic)Analysis of Variance Table Model 1: cmm ~ inc + factor(mic) + spp/factor(vial) Model 2: cmm ~ inc + spp/factor(vial) Res.Df RSS Df Sum of Sq F Pr(>F) 1 1112 6021.5 2 1112 6021.5 0 -9.0949e-13 Is this meaningful? How can I fix this? Thank you! Wes [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
wesman2k1 at aim.com
2010-Apr-21 19:50 UTC
[R] Degrees of Freedom Not Allocated to Residuals in Reduced Model
I am trying to test for fixed factor main effects in an unbalanced mixed effects model but when I fit the reduced model for "mic" factor effects, the extra degrees of freedom are being allocated to a nested term rather than the residuals. The model has inc, mic and spp are independent variables and vial nested within spp. inc and spp are already coded as factors since they were entered as text in the dataframe "t". ##Full Model> fit<-lm(cmm~inc+factor(mic)+spp/factor(vial),t) > anova(fit)Analysis of Variance Table Response: cmm Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) inc 1 2099.3 2099.3 387.6854 < 2.2e-16 *** factor(mic) 2 502.3 251.2 46.3823 < 2.2e-16 *** spp 2 7947.1 3973.5 733.8008 < 2.2e-16 *** spp:factor(vial) 94 3746.9 39.9 7.3612 < 2.2e-16 *** Residuals 1112 6021.5 5.4 ## Reduced Model> fitredmic<-lm(cmm~inc+spp/factor(vial),t) > anova(fitredmic)Analysis of Variance Table Response: cmm Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) inc 1 2099.3 2099.3 387.6854 < 2.2e-16 *** spp 2 8149.7 4074.9 752.5124 < 2.2e-16 *** spp:factor(vial) 96 4046.6 42.2 7.7843 < 2.2e-16 *** Residuals 1112 6021.5 5.4 ##So the degrees of freedom for the comparison are 0:> anova(fit,fitredmic)Analysis of Variance Table Model 1: cmm ~ inc + factor(mic) + spp/factor(vial) Model 2: cmm ~ inc + spp/factor(vial) Res.Df RSS Df Sum of Sq F Pr(>F) 1 1112 6021.5 2 1112 6021.5 0 -9.0949e-13 Is this meaningful? How can I fix this? Thank you! Wes
Maybe Matching Threads
- vector("integer", length) : vector size specified is too large
- assign()ing within apply
- Can I index a dataframe with a reference from/to a second dataframe?
- Warning messages in Splancs package :: no non-missing arguments to min; returning Inf
- "/" operator in model formula