Dear Randall,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Randall Wrong <randall.wrong at
gmail.com> wrote:> Dear R users,
>
> ?rgamma gives me :
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? rgamma(n, shape, rate = 1, scale = 1/rate)
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? rate: an alternative way to specify the scale.
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? The Gamma distribution with parameters ?shape? = a and
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?scale? = s has density
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? f(x)= 1/(s^a Gamma(a)) x^(a-1) e^-(x/s)
>
> Should I understand that scale=1/rate ? Is it written somewhere ?
You are kidding, right? It is written 8 lines above your question, by
my count. :-)
Perhaps you meant rate = 1/scale.
>
> Then rgamma(n, shape=a, scale = s) should be equivalent to rgamma(n,
> shape=a, rate =1/s).
Yep:
dgamma(2, shape = 3, scale = 4)
dgamma(2, shape = 3, rate = 1/4)
>
> I don't find this very clear.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Randall
>
The point is that some books (and software) parameterize by the
'scale', and a whole other bunch parameterize by the 'rate'.
The
reader (and user) always needs to be careful that the version used is
the one expected. And the help file says that S doesn't have a
'scale'
parameter at all.
Just be careful, and you should be fine. And IMHO, given that the PDF
of the density is shown it is reasonably clear as-is.
Best,
Jay
***************************************************
G. Jay Kerns, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Mathematics & Statistics
Youngstown State University
Youngstown, OH 44555-0002 USA
Office: 1035 Cushwa Hall
Phone: (330) 941-3310 Office (voice mail)
-3302 Department
-3170 FAX
VoIP: gjkerns at ekiga.net
E-mail: gkerns at ysu.edu
http://people.ysu.edu/~gkerns/