Dear Kathryn,
I assume that MWDError is the error variance associated with MWD. If MWD is
a standardized variable (i.e., with a variance of 1) then 59% of its
variance is unaccounted for.
I hope this helps,
John
--------------------------------
John Fox
Senator William McMaster
Professor of Social Statistics
Department of Sociology
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
web: socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox
> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at
r-project.org]
On> Behalf Of Kathryn Barto
> Sent: February-09-10 6:23 AM
> To: r-help at r-project.org
> Subject: [R] interpreting error estimate in SEM
>
> hi,
>
> I'm using the sem package, and I want to make sure I'm interpreting
the
> output correctly. Here is an excerpt of my output. When I report the MWD
> error, should I say that 59% of the variation in MWD is not explained by
the> model, or that 59% of the variation is explained, or something entirely
> different.
>
> Parameter Estimates
> Estimate Std Error z value Pr(>|z|)
> NplantRoots 0.462029 0.120803 3.82466 1.3095e-04 plantRoots
<--> - N
> ...
> CoError 1.000011 0.151850 6.58553 4.5325e-11 Co <--> Co
> carbonateError 1.000009 0.156217 6.40142 1.5394e-10 carbonate
<-->> carbonate
> MWDError 0.589788 0.092128 6.40185 1.5351e-10 MWD
<-->
MWD>
> Thanks
> Kathryn
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.