Dear All, I use R to conduct multilevel modeling. However, I have a problem about the interpretation of random effect. Unlike the variables in fixed effects, the variables in random effects have not shown the p-value, so I don't know whether they are significant or not? I want to obtain this figure to make the decision. Thanks a lot! Below is the syntax and output of my program: library(nlme) dataset <- read.csv("d:/dataset.csv") lme11 <- lme(Overall~1, random=~1|School, method="ML", data=dataset) summary(lme11) Linear mixed-effects model fit by maximum likelihood Data: dataset AIC BIC logLik 12637.06 12656.27 -6315.53 Random effects: Formula: ~1 | School (Intercept) Residual StdDev: 0.2912031 0.9894488 (<-- No p-value) Fixed effects: Overall ~ 1 Value Std.Error DF t-value p-value (Intercept) 0.7755495 0.06758038 4444 11.47596 0 (<-- Have p-value) Standardized Within-Group Residuals: Min Q1 Med Q3 Max -3.797466473 -0.661750231 -0.007874993 0.652625939 3.549169733 Number of Observations: 4464 Number of Groups: 20 Best Regards, Tommy Research Assistant of HKIEd [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
You can use intervals to get the Confidence intervals of fixed and random effects. Best 2009/3/17 WONG, Ka Yau <kayau at ied.edu.hk>:> Dear All, > > ? ? ? ? I use R to conduct multilevel modeling. However, I have a problem about the interpretation of random effect. Unlike the variables in fixed effects, the variables in random effects have not shown the p-value, so I don't know whether they are significant or not? I want to obtain this figure to make the decision. ?Thanks a lot! > > Below is the syntax and output of my program: > > library(nlme) > dataset <- read.csv("d:/dataset.csv") > lme11 <- lme(Overall~1, random=~1|School, method="ML", data=dataset) > summary(lme11) > > Linear mixed-effects model fit by maximum likelihood > Data: dataset > ? ? ? AIC ? ? ?BIC ? logLik > ?12637.06 12656.27 -6315.53 > > Random effects: > ?Formula: ~1 | School > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(Intercept) ?Residual > StdDev: ? 0.2912031 0.9894488 ? ? ? ?(<-- No p-value) > > Fixed effects: Overall ~ 1 > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Value ? ? ?Std.Error ? ? ?DF ? ? t-value ? ? p-value > (Intercept) 0.7755495 0.06758038 4444 11.47596 ? ? ? 0 ? ? ? ? ? ?(<-- Have p-value) > > Standardized Within-Group Residuals: > ? ? ? ? ?Min ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Q1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Med ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Q3 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Max > -3.797466473 -0.661750231 -0.007874993 ?0.652625939 ?3.549169733 > > Number of Observations: 4464 > Number of Groups: 20 > > > Best Regards, > Tommy > Research Assistant of HKIEd > > ? ? ? ?[[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >-- HUANG Ronggui, Wincent Tel: (00852) 3442 3832 PhD Candidate Dept of Public and Social Administration City University of Hong Kong Home page: http://asrr.r-forge.r-project.org/rghuang.html A sociologist is someone who, when a beautiful women enters the room and everybody look at her, looks at everybody.
Dear experts, I use R to conduct multilevel modeling. However, I have a problem about the interpretation of random effect. Unlike the variables in fixed effects, the variables in random effects have not shown the standard error (s.e.) and p-value, so I don't know whether they are significant or not? I want to obtain these figures to make the decision. Thank you for your great help! Below is the syntax and output of my program: library(nlme) dataset <- read.csv("d:/dataset.csv") lme11 <- lme(Overall~1, random=~1|School, method="ML", data=dataset) summary(lme11) Linear mixed-effects model fit by maximum likelihood Data: dataset AIC BIC logLik 12637.06 12656.27 -6315.53 Random effects: Formula: ~1 | School (Intercept) Residual StdDev: 0.2912031 0.9894488 (<-- No s.e. & p-value) Fixed effects: Overall ~ 1 Value Std.Error DF t-value p-value (Intercept) 0.7755495 0.06758038 4444 11.47596 0 (<-- Have s.e. & p-value) Standardized Within-Group Residuals: Min Q1 Med Q3 Max -3.797466473 -0.661750231 -0.007874993 0.652625939 3.549169733 Number of Observations: 4464 Number of Groups: 20 Best Regards, Tommy Research Assistant of HKIEd [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Maybe Matching Threads
- NLME - multilevel model using binary outcome - logistic regression
- Multilevel GEE (2 nested clusters)
- Multilevel model with lme(): Weird degrees of freedom (group level df > # of groups)
- Multilevel Modeling using glmmPQL
- bootstrapping: multilevel and multiple mediation