hi: maybe it's minimizing the negative of the likeihood rather than
maximizing the likelihood ?
other than that, i don't see that being possible because of what you
said. see what
happens if you estimate an arima(1,1,3) ?
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Stephen Collins wrote:
> All -
> I am evaluating an arima(2,1,3) and arima(3,1,3) and notice the
> log-likelihood of the restricted model is higher than the
> log-likelihood of the unrestricted.
> Since these are nested models, I thought the unrestricted model would
> have a log-likelihood at least as large as that of the restricted
> model. Am I interpreting the "loglik" output incorrectly?
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephen Collins, MPP | Analyst
> Health & Benefits | Aon Consulting
> 200 East Randolph, Suite 900, Chicago, IL
> Tel: 312-381-2578 | Fax: 312-381-0136
> Email: stephen_collins at aon.com
> Aon Consulting selected by the readers of Business Insurance as the
> ???Best Employee Benefit Consulting Firm??? in 2006, 2007, and 2008
> NOTE: The information contained in this transmission, including any
> attachment(s) is only for the use of the intended individual(s) or
> entity, and may contain information that is privileged and
> confidential. If the reader of this message is not an intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution, disclosure, or copying of this information is
> unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please contact the sender immediately by reply
> email and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.