It does look like Gentleman and Ihaka not only lied to the New York Times, but also to the New Zealand Herald and who knows who else. This is disgusting. The R programming language is the S programming language, and Gentleman and Ihaka are not the ones who designed it. http://thenewyorktimesissloppy.blogspot.com/
markleeds at verizon.net
2009-Jan-20 04:38 UTC
[R] Gentleman and Ihaka's integrity in question
Hi: I think I saw a link where the author clarified the original article and explained more clearly that the design of R had it roots in S/S+. I don't remember where I saw it but it's somewhere. Also, I think it's jumping the gun to claim that anyone lied to anyone before doing the research and knowing that FOR SURE but that's just my opinion and you are entitled to yours. On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Robert Wilkins wrote:> It does look like Gentleman and Ihaka not only lied to the New York > Times, but also to the New Zealand Herald and who knows who else. This > is disgusting. The R programming language is the S programming > language, and Gentleman and Ihaka are not the ones who designed it. > > http://thenewyorktimesissloppy.blogspot.com/ > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Reasonably Related Threads
- Gentleman and Ihaka , 2000 paper question
- Electronic copy of Ihaka and Gentleman (1996)?
- What happened to Ross Ihaka's proposal for a Common Lisp based R successor?
- What happened to Ross Ihaka's proposal for a Common Lisp based R successor?
- What happened to Ross Ihaka's proposal for a Common Lisp based R successor?