shirley zhang
2007-Jun-05 15:29 UTC
[R] Can I treat subject as fixed effect in linear model
Hi, There are 20 subjects grouped by Gender, each subject has 2 tissues (normal vs. cancer). In fact, it is a 2-way anova (factors: Gender and tissue) with tissue nested in subject. I've tried the following: Model 1: lme(response ~ tissue*Gender, random = ~1|subject) Model 2: response ~ tissue*Gender + subject Model 3: response ~ tissue*Gender It seems like Model 1 is the correct one since my experiment design is nested design. However, can anybody tell me whether Model2 is completely illegal? Thanks
Spencer Graves
2007-Jun-07 04:16 UTC
[R] Can I treat subject as fixed effect in linear model
The short answer is that you could fit that fixed-effect model
using 'lm', for example. That would make sense if you wanted to make
inference only about that particular group of 20 subjects AND you
thought it was inappropriate to consider that their contribution to a
model would follow a normal distribution.
If you want to make inference beyond that group of 20 subjects,
then the fixed effect analysis is not appropriate. If you thought it
was inappropriate to think that individual adjustments for each subject
were normally distributed, then the question is how far from normal
might they be.
I don't think Model2 is "illegal" in the sense that you are
not
likely to be sent to prison for using it. However, I wouldn't do it.
I'd make use your Model 1 and make all the plots that seem consistent
with that model, as described in Pinheiro and Bates (2000) Mixed-Effects
Models in S and S-Plus (Springer). If the plots (or something else)
suggested that some of my assumptions were inappropriate, then I'd
consider other alternative models. However, that could be a lot of
work, and I wouldn't undertake such an effort without some pretty strong
justification.
Hope this helps.
Spencer
shirley zhang wrote:> Hi,
>
> There are 20 subjects grouped by Gender, each subject has 2 tissues
> (normal vs. cancer).
>
> In fact, it is a 2-way anova (factors: Gender and tissue) with tissue
> nested in subject. I've tried the following:
>
> Model 1: lme(response ~ tissue*Gender, random = ~1|subject)
> Model 2: response ~ tissue*Gender + subject
> Model 3: response ~ tissue*Gender
>
>
> It seems like Model 1 is the correct one since my experiment design is
> nested design. However, can anybody tell me whether Model2 is
> completely illegal?
>
> Thanks
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>