Assuming script 'common.q' contains code that needed
different processing depending on interpreter
(either S-PLUS or R), what should the condition be?
if (<condition>) {
# Do S-PLUS code
} else {
# Do R code
}
Looking for something akin to the C preprocessor directive
USING_R, but for S.
----------------------------------------------------------
SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped)
On 12/6/2006 5:02 PM, Paul Roebuck wrote:> Assuming script 'common.q' contains code that needed > different processing depending on interpreter > (either S-PLUS or R), what should the condition be? > > if (<condition>) { > # Do S-PLUS code > } else { > # Do R code > } > > Looking for something akin to the C preprocessor directive > USING_R, but for S.See ?is.R. This function is defined in both R and current versions of S-PLUS; there are instructions for how to put together a test that works in older S-PLUS versions too. Duncan Murdoch
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Paul Roebuck wrote:> Assuming script 'common.q' contains code that needed > different processing depending on interpreter > (either S-PLUS or R), what should the condition be? >I believe exists("is.R") && is.R() is a reliable condition. -thomas