As an extreme example of this sort of thing, consider
fit <- lme(y ~ 1, random = ~ 1 | group)
where there is exactly one observation per group, so that it is not possible to
get separate estimates of group and residual variances. Despite this, lme
often (always?) provides a solution consistent with the data. Because of the
singularity, the plot of residuals against fitted values for this solution
shows a straight line. This is easily recognized as an aberration, but I can
imagine configurations of data (e.g. with most groups having just one
observation and a few with two or more) where the residual vs fitted value plot
might show an apparent trend.
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 03:43:12PM -0400, Rick Bilonick
wrote:> I'm fitting a mixed effects model:
>
> fit.1 <- lme(y~x,random=~1|id,data=df)
>
> There are two different observations for each id for both x and y. When
> I use plot(fit.1), there is a strong increasing linear trend in the
> residuals versus the fitted values (with no outliers). This also happens
> if I use random=~x|id. Am I specifying something incorrectly?
>
> Rick B.
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
--
************************************************
* I.White *
* University of Edinburgh *
* Ashworth Laboratories, West Mains Road *
* Edinburgh EH9 3JT *
* Fax: 0131 650 6564 Tel: 0131 650 5490 *
* E-mail: i.m.s.white at ed.ac.uk *