>>>>> "William" == William Asquith <wasquith at
austin.rr.com>
>>>>> on Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:14:50 -0600 writes:
William> I have question (curiosity) regarding returned values of R's
qcauchy
William> () function,
William> for nonexceedance probability (F). It seems the ideal returned
range
William> of cauchy distribution should be [-Inf,Inf].
William> For F=0
>> qcauchy(0)
William> [1] -Inf
William> but for F=1
>> qcauchy(1)
William> [1] 8.16562e+15
William> It seems to me that the proper return value should be Inf???
yes, but istn't 8 * 10^15 a good approximation to +Inf ? :-) :-)
William> For default (location=0,scale=1) quantile function of cauchy
William> x(F) = tan(pi * (F - 0.5))
William> For F = 0
>> tan(pi*(-0.5))
William> [1] -1.633124e+16
William> For F = 1
>> tan(pi*(0.5))
William> [1] 1.633124e+16
William> So I conclude that qcauchy(0) properly handles the -Inf result
and
William> the qcauchy(1) returns a very large number,
William> curiously not equal to tan (0.5*pi), but certainly not Inf.
The reason for the current behavior is the following part of
qcauchy.c :
return location + (lower_tail ? -scale : scale) / tan(M_PI * p);
/* -1/tan(pi * p) = -cot(pi * p) = tan(pi * (p - 1/2)) */
(note the comment!)
I'll fix this, since I had wanted to do it in the past (and
then thought it wasn't important enough to warrant an extra if()
in the code).
Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
William> As double check,
>> tan(pi*(0.99999-0.5))
William> [1] 31830.99
>> qcauchy(0.99999)
William> [1] 31830.99