I just wanted to make one clarification about my statement: "After some
time, my collegues at the Food and Drug Adminstration have finally
acknowledged R as a powerful statistical computing environment." I did not
intend for this to read that R has been acknowledged as being 21 CFR Part
11 compliant. This is a whole other ball game. What I meant to say is that,
within the Center of Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) the Office of
Biostatistics is willing to look into whether or not reviewers can download
R onto their government issued PC's. And this must all be approved by the
Office of Information and Technology. So admittedly, this is only a small
step, but nonetheless it is a step in the right direction.
I apologize for any confusion. Cheers,
Mat
Disclaimer which I also forgot in the original post: The following views are
those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the FDA.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch
> [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of Duncan Murdoch
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 6:30 AM
> To: Soukup, Mat
> Cc: 'r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch'
> Subject: Re: [R] Potential for R to conflict with other softwares
>
> On 11/3/2005 9:11 AM, Soukup, Mat wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > After some time, my collegues at the Food and Drug
> Adminstration have
> > finally acknowledged R as a powerful statistical computing
> environment.
> > However, in order to comply with the Office of Information
> and Technology
> > standards there are a couple of questions about whether R
> could interfere
> > with other software. As I'm more of a driver of the R
> software and not a
> > mechanic, I was hoping for the insight of the many great
> useRs. Below is a
> > list of 5 proposed questions to which I value any comment.
> >
> > Thank you for your time,
> >
> > -Mat
> >
> >
>
> These answers are about the Windows version only, but from the
> questions, I think that's what you were looking for. They
> apply to all
> versions since 1.6.x at least (though the earlier ones would have put
> fewer entries into the registry, they put them in the same places).
>
> > 1. Does R have high resolution graphics?
>
> Yes, but I don't think I get the point of this question. How
> would that
> interfere with other software?
> >
> > 2. Does R have .dll files, or other executables which are
> not located in the
> > R software directory tree?
>
> No, it installs everything below R_HOME.
> >
> > 3. Does R modify the Windows registry in a non-obvious way,
> i.e. other than
> > defining itself and what extensions to associate with R,
> and what are those
> > extensions?
>
> I think all of its modifications would count as obvious. They are
> mainly below HKLM/Software/R-core or HKCU/Software/R-core (where the
> file locations are recorded); additionally file associations
> are set up
> for .Rdata files (which are called RWorkspace files there), and an
> uninstall entry is made.
> >
> > 4. Does R add macros to any part of MS Office?
>
> No.
> >
> > 5. Can you anticipate any other way in which installing and
> using R could
> > disrupt the operation of another software?
>
> No, not really. Maybe users will become addicted to it? ;-)
>
> Duncan Murdoch
> >
> >
> >
> **************************************************************
> *********
> > Mat Soukup, Ph.D.
> > Food and Drug Administration
> > 10903 New Hampshire Ave.
> > BLDG 22 RM 5329
> > Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
> > Phone: 301.796.1005
> >
> **************************************************************
> *********
> >
> >
> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide!
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide!
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>