bavorak at klobouk.fsv.cvut.cz wrote:> Hello,
> I could not yet create combined graph in R. To avoid misunderstands,
> three examples (originally created in Quattro pro) have been attached.
Only one graph seems to have made it through to the mailing list. You
should avoid posting things with attachments.
My initial response is "Why?". This graph is horrible. Most of the
information is obscured by the overlapping graphics. You can't see the
red line for about 90% of the plot, although it occasionally peeks out
between the green and yellow. The spikes seem to be clipped at the top
of the plot (do the values go higher or is there a hard limit on what
they can go up to?) and the sharpness of the spikes makes it hard to
tell what's going on.
The X-axis numbering is in increments of 11. Do you have an extra
finger? And which of the numerous tick marks corresponds to the
number?>
> Can you send me an algorithm to plot this in this form?
>
We could probably do better, but the data didn't make it through
either. The important thing with any plot is to design it to help tell
the viewer what you want to say. All this plot says to me is 'the green
and yellow are correlated (when not obscured by blue)', 'blue and red
spikes seem correlated (when red not obscured)', and 'blue and red are
more spiky than green and yellow'.
Look at the documentation for 'matplot', which draws multiple lines
from a matrix of data. I'd plot the data as simple lines, not coloured
areas, so there's less obscuring, and probably transform the Y-values to
smooth it out a bit. R will automatically make the X-axis values in
multiples of 5 or 10, and give you a decent number of tick marks. You
can even have the X-axis labeled with the calendar date.
This is a classic example of bad spreadsheet graphics!
Barry