Law, Jacqueline {Regu~Pleasanton}
2003-Sep-24 19:13 UTC
[R] probit analysis for correlated binary data
Dear all, I have a question on the dose-response estimation with clustered/ correlated binary data. I would like to estimate the hit rate for a certain test at various concentration levels. The test is used on 5 subjects, and each subject is tested 20 times. If we assume that the 100 samples are independent, the hit rate estimate is unbiased, but the variance is under-estimated. The other estimate of interest is the concentration that will give a 95% sensitivity of the test. I suppose the same problem would occur if a probit model is fitted to the data and assume all the samples are independent. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to analyze this kind of data? Thanks a lot in advance. - Jacqueline
White, Charles E WRAIR-Wash DC
2003-Sep-25 12:05 UTC
[R] probit analysis for correlated binary data
I can't tell you how to solve your problem but I can suggest where to look. Alan Agresti released a second edition to his book on categorical data analysis early this year. One of the big updates to that book is a chapter on Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM). The good news is that random effects for Probit models are explicitly referenced in the index. The bad news is that the section referenced is a mathematical exercise for the reader. Charles E. White, Biostatistician Walter Reed Army Institute of Research 503 Robert Grant Ave., Room 1w102 Silver Spring, MD 20910-1557 301 319-9781 WRAIR Home Page: http://wrair-www.army.mil/ [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Law, Jacqueline {Regu~Pleasanton} wrote:> Dear all, > > I have a question on the dose-response estimation with clustered/ > correlated binary data. I would like to estimate the hit rate for a > certain test at various concentration levels. The test is used on 5 > subjects, and each subject is tested 20 times. If we assume that the 100 > samples are independent, the hit rate estimate is unbiased, but the > variance is under-estimated. The other estimate of interest is the > concentration that will give a 95% sensitivity of the test. I suppose > the same problem would occur if a probit model is fitted to the data and > assume all the samples are independent. Does anyone have any suggestions > on how to analyze this kind of data? >I think you want a GEE, see the `gee' and `geepack' packages. -thomas
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Extracting Vectors from Lists of Lists Produced by Functions
- lme4_0.995-2/Matrix_0.995-4 upgrade introduces error messages (change management)
- Probit Analysis
- Compiling errors for Matrix_0.995-5.tar.gz under XP
- WinXP "developer" asks: Tcl/Tk (Rcmdr) under OS X?