Well, it finally occured to me - predict.nnet() can't handle missing values.
In that case it's not really clear what's the point of adding na.action
to nnet() if I'm going to run into problems with missing values later
anyway...
P.S. Anybody who finds my postings insulting, please write a mail filter
for my address. Although I can not understand why it may insult
anybody.
P.P.S. Must be related to cultural differences, I guess...
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at
stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
